ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: A fracture classification system should provide a reliable and reproducible means of communication between different parties. It should be logical and understandable, with few categories to memorize. The aim of this study was to determine the intra- and interobserver reliability of the Schatzker and Mayo classification systems for the assessment of proximal ulna fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intra- and interobserver reliability studies were conducted on 39 X-rays of injured elbows drawn randomly from 74 cases previously used in a series on predictors of ulnohumeral osteoarthritis in proximal ulna fractures. Ten observers independently reviewed these X-rays on 2 separate occasions 3 months apart. The fracture type was assessed according to the Schatzker and Mayo classification systems during each reading session. Cohen's and Fleiss' kappa were used to measure the intra- and interobserver reliability. RESULTS: The Schatzker classification had a fair interobserver reliability for the first (Schatzker R1, Fleiss' κ: 0.394) and second (Schatzker R2, Fleiss' κ: 0.351) readings. The mean intraobserver reliability value between the 10 reviewers for the Schatzker classification was rated as substantial (0.61). The Mayo classification had a fair interobserver reliability for the first (Mayo R1, Fleiss' κ: 0.278) and second (Mayo R2, Fleiss' κ: 0.292) readings. The mean intraobserver reliability value between the 10 reviewers for the Mayo classification was rated as fair (0.52). DISCUSSION: The classification systems for proximal ulna fractures showed poor reproducibility between the different observers since they had low interobserver agreement values. Nevertheless, their use remained reliable since the measured intraobserver agreement value was deemed substantial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Traumatic injuries to the distal quarter of the leg present a significant risk of skin necrosis and exposure of the underlying fracture site or the osteosynthesis material that often result in bone and joint infection. In the case of small or medium-sized bone exposure, local muscles may be one of the best options for lower extremity coverage. We describe our experience using the extensor digitorum brevis muscle flap in a context of posttraumatic bone and joint infection in fourteen patients. Our main objective was to assess the outcomes and the donor-site morbidity of the extensor digitorum brevis muscle flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study in a French reference center for bone and joint infection from 2014 to 2018 reviewed cases of traumatic injuries with skin complications and bone and joint infection that required an extensor digitorum brevis muscle flap coverage. Fourteen patients were evaluated for early and late complications, 11 men and three women with a mean age of 51.4±17.72 (19-71) years. Seven of these were open fractures and nine cases were pilon fractures. Donor-site morbidity was assessed in nine patients. RESULTS: Early flap complications included two cases (14.2%) of hematoma, one case (7.1%) of partial necrosis and four cases (28.5%) of donor-site dehiscence. Late complications caused by persistent infection were found in two patients (14.2%), with one case (7.1%) of chronic osteoarthritis and one case (7.1%) of septic pseudarthrosis. From a functional and cosmetic point of view, eight patients (89%) were satisfied, to very satisfied. CONCLUSION: Experience and a multidisciplinary approach are keys in providing an optimal treatment strategy for complex cases of bone and joint infection. The extensor digitorum brevis muscle is a reliable flap for small defects with underlying infection. Being made up of muscle tissue, this flap offers good resistance to infection and enables satisfactory distribution of antibiotics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
