Electrocardiogram Belt guidance for left ventricular lead placement and biventricular pacing optimization.

BACKGROUND: Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, non-left bundle branch block, or QRS duration <150 ms have a lower response rate to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) than did other indicated patients. The ECG Belt system (EBS) is a novel surface mapping system designed to measure electrical dyssynchrony via the standard deviation of the activation times of the left ventricle. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of the EBS in patients less likely to respond to CRT and to determine whether EBS use in lead placement guidance and device programming was superior to standard CRT care. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized trial of patients with heart failure and EBS-guided CRT implantation and programming vs standard CRT care. The primary end point was relative change in left ventricular end-systolic volume from baseline to 6 months postimplantation. RESULTS: A total of 408 patients from centers in Europe and North America were randomized. Although both patients with EBS and control patients had a mean improvement in left ventricular end-systolic volume, there was no significant difference in relative change from baseline (P = .26). While patients with a higher baseline standard deviation of the activation times derived greater left ventricular reverse remodeling, improvement in electrical dyssynchrony did not correlate with the extent of reverse remodeling. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study do not support EBS-guided therapy for CRT management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Novel Extravascular Defibrillation Configuration With a Coil in the Substernal Space: The ASD Clinical Study.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the defibrillation efficacy of the substernal-lateral electrode configuration. BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are regarded as alternatives to transvenous ICDs in certain subjects. However, substantially higher shock energy of up to 80 J may be required. Proposed is a new defibrillation method of placing the shock coil into the substernal space. METHODS: This prospective, nonrandomized, feasibility study was conducted in subjects scheduled for midline sternotomy or implant of ICD. A blunted end tunneling tool was used to insert a defibrillation lead behind the sternum using a percutaneous subxiphoid approach. A skin patch electrode was placed on the left mid-axillary line at the fourth to fifth intercostal space. After ventricular fibrillation induction, a single 35-J shock was delivered between the lead and skin patch. RESULTS: Sixteen subjects (12 males, 4 females; mean age: 61.6 ± 11.8 years) were enrolled. The mean lead placement time was 11.1 ± 6.6 min. Of the 14 subjects with successfully induced ventricular fibrillation episodes, 13 subjects (92.9%) had successful defibrillation. The 1 failure was associated with high and lateral shock coil placement. Mean ventricular fibrillation duration was 18.4 ± 5.6 s with a shock impedance of 98.1 ± 19.3 ohms. Of the 11 subjects with coil-patch electrograms, the average R-wave amplitude during sinus rhythm was 3.0 ± 1.4 mV. CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data demonstrate that substernal defibrillation is feasible and successful defibrillation can be achieved with the shock energy available in current transvenous ICDs. This may open new alternatives to extravascular ICD therapy.

Increase of ventricular interval during atrial fibrillation by atrioventricular node vagal stimulation: chronic clinical atrioventricular-nodal stimulation download study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with a high ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation (AF) are at increased risk of receiving inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. The objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of high frequency atrioventricular-nodal stimulation (AVNS) to reduce the ventricular rate during AF to prevent inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with a new atrial lead placement as part of a cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator implant and a history of paroxysmal or persistent AF were eligible. If proper atrial lead position was confirmed, AVNS software was uploaded to the cardiac resynchronization therapy device, tested, and optimized. AVNS was delivered via a right atrial pacing lead positioned in the posterior right atrium. Software allowed initiation of high frequency bursts triggered on rapidly conducted AF. Importantly, the efficacy was evaluated during spontaneous AF episodes between 1 and 6 months after implant. Forty-four patients were enrolled in 4 centers. Successful atrial lead placement occurred in 74%. Median implant time of the AVNS lead was 37 minutes. In 26 (81%) patients, manual AVNS tests increased the ventricular interval by >25%. Between 1 and 6 months, automatic AVNS activations occurred in 4 patients with rapidly conducted AF, and in 3 patients, AVNS slowed the ventricular rate out of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock zone. No adverse events were associated with the AVNS software. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated the feasibility of implementation of AVNS in a cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator system. AVNS increased ventricular interval >25% in 81% of patients. AVNS did not influence the safety profile of the cardiac resynchronization therapy and defibrillator system. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01095952.