Retrospective analysis of treatment, including access to breast reconstructions, of breast cancer patients - war refugees from Ukraine in Poland - the experience of a single tertiary care institution.

<b>Introduction:</b> Following the Russian invasion, more than 3600000 refugees have fled Ukraine and settled down in Poland; this group includes a growing number of breast cancer patients whose treatment had been started in Ukraine and hence required urgent therapy in Poland.</br></br> <b>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to analyze the treatment of breast cancer patients from Ukraine, who entered Poland as war refugees - the experience of a single tertiary care institution.</br></br> <b>Material and methods:</b> The treatment of 25 consecutive breast cancer patients, war refugees from Ukraine was reviewed retrospectively.</br></br> <b>Results:</b> Patients were treated according to subtype and staging, e.g. surgery, endocrine, anti-HER2 therapy, chemotherapy, radiotherapy. 7 patients received an immediate implant, mesh-based breast reconstruction. In 2 cases, the patients refused breast reconstruction.</br></br> <b>Conclusions:</b> Nearly 5.5 million refugees across Europe who have fled the combat zones in Ukraine; of these, the vast majority sought shelter in Poland, and many of whom are women. It is expected that breast cancer mortality rates may rise and progress in oncology may slow as the war in Ukraine disrupts routine patient care, clinical trials and research. Hence, support from neighboring countries is mandatory.

The PD-1 single-nucleotide polymorphism rs11568821 and rs2227981 as a novel prognosis model in a triple-negative breast cancer patient.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study is to determine the relationship between polymorphisms rs11568821 C/T and at rs2227981 G/A in the programmed cell death 1 gene (PDCD1) and the clinicopathologic characteristics of triple negative breast cancer patient (TNBC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 30 TNBC patients and 30 healthy controls. Genotyping was performed with allelic discrimination using PCR with TaqMan SNP Genotyping Assays. RESULTS: The presence of CC/CT in rs11568821and GG/AG in rs2227981 were not associated with the risk of progression of TNBC. The correlation between rs11568821 minor allele distribution and risk of TNBC has borderline significance (p = 0.0619). The rs2227981 polymorphism has a significant association with grade G (G3, p = 0.0229). There was a trend toward significance (p = 0.063448) in the minor allele presentation and Ki67 > 20% for rs2227981. Other clinical features (e.g. age, TNM stage) did not significantly correlate with the rs11568821 or the rs2227981 polymorphism. CONCLUSION: rs2227981 is associated with grading; hence PDCD1 can be used as a prognostic marker in TNBC.

A Retrospective Study Assessing the Outcomes of Immediate Prepectoral and Subpectoral Implant and Mesh-Based Breast Reconstruction.

(1) Introduction: In response to patient concerns about breast cancer recurrence, increased use of breast magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing, and advancements in breast reconstruction techniques, mastectomy rates have been observed to rise over the last decade. The aim of the study is to compare the outcomes of prepectoral and subpectoral implants and long-term, dual-stage resorbable mesh-based breast reconstructions in mutation carriers (prophylactic surgery) and breast cancer patients. (2) Patients and methods: This retrospective, two-center study included 170 consecutive patients after 232 procedures: Prepectoral surgery was performed in 156 cases and subpectoral was performed in 76. (3) Results: Preoperative chemotherapy was associated with more frequent minor late complications (p < 0.001), but not major ones (p = 0.101), while postoperative chemotherapy was related to more frequent serious (p = 0.005) postoperative complications. Postoperative radiotherapy was associated with a higher rate of minor complications (31.03%) than no-radiotherapy (12.21%; p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression found complications to be significantly associated with an expander (OR = 4.43), skin-reducing mastectomy (OR = 9.97), therapeutic mastectomy vs. risk-reducing mastectomy (OR = 4.08), and postoperative chemotherapy (OR = 12.89). Patients in whom prepectoral surgeries were performed demonstrated significantly shorter median hospitalization time (p < 0.001) and lower minor complication rates (5.77% vs. 26.32% p < 0.001), but similar major late complication rates (p = 0.915). (4) Conclusions: Implant-based breast reconstruction with the use of long-term, dual-stage resorbable, synthetic mesh is a safe and effective method of breast restoration, associated with low morbidity and good cosmesis. Nevertheless, prospective, multicenter, and long-term outcome data studies are needed to further evaluate the benefits of such treatments.

Assessment of the use of the Magseed marker in the localization of non-palpable lesions in the mammary gland.

Introduction Currently, more and more cases of breast cancer are detected in the early stages of advancement. Removal of the minimum required tissue volume ensures that the proper shape of the breast is maintained. On the other hand, it is important to get negative tissue margins. Objective To present your own experience with the use of preoperative breast tumor determination using the Magseed marker. Material and methods On the eve of the procedure, a Magtrace magnetic marker was administered to determine the lymph nodes and, under ultrasound control, a Magseed magnetic marker to the tumor, and the site of the lesion was marked with a skin marker as the operated site. Before the skin incision, the lesion was located using intraoperative ultrasound and the Sentimag probe. After the tumor was excision, the presence of the marker was confirmed in the preparation using the magnetic method and the compatibility of the ultrasound image before and after the procedure. The results of the research group were 23 patients. Radicality of the procedure was achieved in 20 patients (87%). To assess the size of the preparation and tumor, a formula from the work of Angarita et al. on the volume of the ellipsoid was used. It was assessed what part of the excised preparation was a tumor marked using the Magseed marker. Cohorts of 11 patients at the beginning and end of the evaluated group were compared, showing a significant increase in this parameter. Together with the learning curve, you can identify the tumor much more precisely and save healthy breast tissues by improving the aesthetic effect in the breast range. Conclusions The method of localization of non-pallpatory lesions in the mammary gland using the Magseed marker is simple to use, and the high detection rate directly translates into a reduction in the percentage of non-radical treatments in the case of sparing treatment.