Impact of Dietary Protein on Osteoporosis Development.

Osteoporosis is a frequent yet unsolved health problem among older people. The influence of dietary protein still raises many questions regarding its quality and quantity in the context of bone health. The aim of this manuscript is to review the latest evidence on plant and animal protein influences on bone health in various groups of patients. The review is based on original studies, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective cohort studies published in PubMed and Cochrane databases during the last five years. Combining plant and animal protein with physical activity has the best effect on bones (muscle strengthening and reducing the risk of falls), while high protein intake can have adverse effects during bed rest. Despite the content of isoflavones, plant protein is not more beneficial than animal protein (dairy products) and can increase bone resorption markers. Hypoestrogenism due to menopause or eating disorders leads to low bone density and an increased risk of osteoporosis. A well-balanced diet with sufficient energy supply and protein intake (both of plant and animal origins) and adequate physical activity are crucial to ensure bone health. Dietary interventions should consider the quantity and quality of protein in patients with other comorbidities, particularly in an aging society.

Safety of brand name to generic substitution of lacosamide in patients with epilepsy - A prospective single-center observational study.

PURPOSE: Lacosamide is a widely used third-generation antiseizure medication. However, there is a lack of evidence regarding the safety of substituting brand-name lacosamide with its generic version. This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes associated with switching from the brand-name to the generic form of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: This prospective observational study involved patients undergoing treatment with LCM at the university epilepsy clinic. In 2018, the price of the brand-name LCM in Poland increased up to 110-fold compared to generic products. Anticipating that most patients would opt to switch to the generic formulations due to financial constraints, we chose to follow up them prospectively to assess the safety of transitioning from the brand-name to the generic form of LCM. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients, aged 18-62 years, diagnosed with focal epilepsy and undergoing LCM treatment at our institution, decided to switch from the brand-name (Vimpat) to generic variations (Lacosamide TEVA, Lacosamide Glenmark, and Lacosamide Accord). Following the switch, no significant difference was observed in terms of seizure frequency before and after (p = 0.55, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Subsequently, adverse events were recorded in four patients (4.9%) during the initial follow-up visit post-switch, including somnolence (2 patients) and dizziness (2 patients). Notably, all adverse events resolved by the second follow-up visit without necessitating treatment modification. Importantly, no patient switched back to brand-name medication CONCLUSION: The generic substitution of lacosamide was found to be generally safe in our study. Nonetheless, to confirm our findings, larger prospective studies are required.

High prevalence of electroencephalographic frontal intermittent rhythmic delta activity in patients with moderately severe COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of our study was to analyse EEG findings in patients with COVID-19 not requiring respiratory support. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed EEGs performed in patients with COVID-19 between April 2020 and May 2021 at the University Hospital in Kraków, Poland. Demographic and clinical data, including comorbid conditions, discharge disposition, survival, neuroimaging findings, laboratory results, and treatment was collected. RESULTS: The study included 44 EEGs performed in 35 patients (51.4% females), aged 65.5 ± 13.9 years. Almost all patients had at least one comorbidity, and one-third had one or more preexisting neurological conditions. Three quarters of EEGs were abnormal. The most frequent EEG finding was background slowing (16 patients; 45.7%). Frontal findings included frontally predominant rhythmic delta (FIRDA) in 10 (28.6%) patients and focal slowing in the left frontal lobe. Patients with abnormal EEG significantly more often required oxygen supplementation (p = 0.003) and were less likely to recover (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Patients with COVID-19 infection may frequently manifest with an abnormal EEG. FIRDA seems to be a frequent EEG pattern in less severe cases of COVID-19 infection. Future studies are needed to establish whether COVID-19 infection increases the risk for FIRDA, and to investigate its pathogenesis.