ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Examination of a blood film is the second most common hematology test, after the complete blood count. Interpretation of a peripheral blood film by trained laboratory professionals provides valuable diagnostic information. The Institute for Quality Management in Healthcare (IQMH) Hematology Scientific Committee developed a questionnaire to gather information regarding current practices for manual blood film review and reporting from laboratories participating in IQMH Morphology proficiency testing (PT) surveys. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to 174 laboratories, 97% submitted results. RESULTS: Of the respondents, the majority (82%) indicated affiliation with small- or medium-sized hospitals (<500 beds). 80% of respondents had core laboratory technologists performing manual blood film reviews, while only 2% utilized dedicated hematology technologists with morphology expertise. All respondents had a policy for manual blood film review by a technologist, 70% did not have blood films reviewed by a senior/charge technologist prior to review by a physician. The majority (88%) of participants included morphological findings in their critical result list; of these, 98% include malaria and 88% include the first-time finding of blasts as critical results. 59% of participants indicated that they have a procedure in place to ensure that interpretation and confirmation of first-time potentially significant morphological findings are available from a physician at all times. CONCLUSION: This survey identified significant variation in blood film review and reporting practices across participating laboratories. The IQMH Hematology Scientific Committee will develop best practice recommendations to guide and standardize practice.
Subject(s)
Hematologic Tests/standards , Hematology/methods , Hematology/standards , Laboratories/standards , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Quality of Health CareABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Octaplex®, a six factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC), has recently been approved for use in Canada. The optimal dose of Octaplex has yet to be established and our study was designed to monitor the efficacy of a low standard dose. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients on warfarin treatment in need of urgent reversal for bleeding, invasive procedures or surgery were given a standard dose of 40 ml (1000 IU FIX, 14 IU/kg). We conducted a retrospective chart review of 231 patients. RESULTS: Patients given concurrent frozen plasma (FP) for reversal were eliminated from the study. Overall, 150 patients were reviewed and divided into three groups: (1) non-CNS bleeders, (2) CNS bleeders, and (3) non-bleeders. Correction of INR to 1.5 or less was achieved to the same extent in each group. Patients with active bleeding had the least successful bleeding cessation and patients with intracranial bleeding had the most dismal outcome compared to non-intracranial bleeders. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that Octaplex, when given as a low standard dose is effective at INR reversal with 76% of our patients correcting to an INR of 1.5 or less. It appears that this dose is sufficient for non-bleeding patients. Bleeding patients may benefit most from a dose increase to achieve more complete reversal and patients with intracranial bleeding should achieve more complete reversal within 2h of presentation.
