Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 36(9): 2037-8, 1992 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1329640

ABSTRACT

Penciclovir (PCV) and acyclovir are acyclic guanine analogs which inhibit herpes simplex virus (HSV) DNA polymerase. Their 50% infective doses were 0.5 to 0.8 microgram/ml for clinical isolates of HSV-1 and 1.3 to 2.2 micrograms/ml for HSV-2. Furthermore, HSV-infected cultures receiving 2-h pulses of PCV had 2- to 50-fold less HSV than acyclovir-treated cultures, consistent with the prolonged intracellular half-life of PCV triphosphate.


Subject(s)
Acyclovir/analogs & derivatives , Acyclovir/pharmacology , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase/metabolism , Simplexvirus/drug effects , Guanine , Half-Life , Humans
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 14(4): 287-91, 1991.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1653677

ABSTRACT

An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) that detects IgM antibody to a peptide component of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) nuclear antigen (EBNA-1) was compared with a conventional rapid heterophil antibody method for the rapid diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis. Discrepancies between the two methods were further analyzed using an indirect immunofluorescence assay to detect antibodies to EBV antigens. We evaluated 298 cases of suspected infectious mononucleosis. The ELISA was very sensitive (98.7%) and able to detect some cases (seven (9%) of 75 confirmed positives) that were negative by the rapid heterophil antibody test, but confirmed by immunofluorescence. However, approximately 17% of all positive tests could not be confirmed by EBV-specific immunofluorescence; thus, the overall positive predictive value was 83%; negative predictive value was 99.5%; and specificity was 93%. The high rate of false-positive tests makes this rapid ELISA unsuitable for the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antigens, Viral/immunology , Herpesvirus 4, Human/immunology , Immunoglobulin M/analysis , Infectious Mononucleosis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Antibodies, Heterophile/analysis , Antigens, Viral/chemistry , Base Sequence , Cell Nucleus/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Immunoglobulin G/analysis , Middle Aged , Molecular Sequence Data , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results
3.
J Clin Microbiol ; 28(6): 1395-7, 1990 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2199500

ABSTRACT

We compared the new Abbott TestPack (TP) respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) with cell culture and two commercial RSV EIAs (from Abbott Diagnostics and Kallestad Laboratories) by using split samples of fresh nasal washings from children with suspected RSV disease. Two tubes of HEp-2 cells were inoculated and observed for cytopathic effect for 14 days, and isolates were confirmed by immunofluorescence. The TP EIA was performed by following the manufacturer's instructions. Specimens positive by TP EIA but negative by culture were examined in a competitive inhibition (blocking) assay using the TP EIA, and rabbit anti-RSV serum. Of 218 specimens, 93 were positive by culture, 105 were positive by TP EIA, 80 were positive by the Abbott Diagnostics EIA, and 87 were positive by the Kallestad Laboratories EIA. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the TP EIA were 92, 86, 81, and 93%, respectively. Of 20 apparently false-positive TP EIAs, 10 of 14 that were positive when retested were neutralized in the blocking assay, indicating that they were truly positive. The recalculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the TP EIA were 92, 91, 90, and 93%, respectively. We conclude that the TP EIA is easy to perform, rapid (less than 0.5 h), and accurate.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Viral/analysis , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/immunology , Respirovirus Infections/diagnosis , Animals , Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Binding, Competitive , Child , Culture Techniques , Humans , Infant , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Rabbits , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 8(2): 101-5, 1987 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3322655

ABSTRACT

Respiratory secretions for viral diagnosis are often collected with nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs, although many laboratories recommend NP aspirates or washings. We compared results using NP washings and NP swabs in three diagnostic RSV tests, a rapid RSV EIA antigen test (Abbott Laboratories), an indirect fluorescent antibody test (FAT) with rabbit antiserum, and virus culture (HEp-2 cells). Paired samples were collected from 121 children with suspected RSV bronchiolitis or pneumonia. A minitip swap was passed into the nasopharynx for 10 sec, rotated and withdrawn. The opposite nares was irrigated with approximately 1 ml of saline and aspirated using a syringe and plastic feeding tube. Fifty-one children (42%) grew RSV in culture, 49 from NP washings versus 27 from NP swabs (p less than 0.001). Fifty-three (44%) were positive by FAT, 52 from NP washings versus 12 from NP swabs (p less than 0.001). Fifty-eight children (48%) had positive RSV EIA tests, 57 from NP washings versus 35 from NP swabs (p less than 0.001). Detection by EIA was more sensitive than culture regardless of the method of specimen collection. We conclude that NP washings are superior to NP swabs for RSV culture and rapid diagnosis by EIA or FAT.


Subject(s)
Nasopharynx/microbiology , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/isolation & purification , Respirovirus Infections/diagnosis , Child , Cytopathogenic Effect, Viral , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Immunosorbent Techniques , Therapeutic Irrigation
5.
J Clin Microbiol ; 22(5): 782-5, 1985 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3902879

ABSTRACT

A new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) respiratory syncytial virus antigen detection kit (Ortho Diagnostics, Inc., Raritan, N.J.) was compared with virus culture and with the indirect fluorescent antibody test (FAT) by using fresh nasal washings from children with suspected respiratory syncytial virus infection. Both uncentrifuged nasal washings and pellets from centrifuged split specimens were examined by ELISA. The ELISA was considered positive when the optical density was greater than the mean background optical density plus 0.15. Specimens positive by ELISA but negative by culture and FAT were reexamined in an ELISA blocking assay. Of 337 uncentrifuged specimens, 124 (37%) were positive by culture, 107 (32%) were positive by FAT, and 166 (49%) were positive by ELISA. Blocking assays showed that 21 of 30 (70%) of the seemingly false-positive ELISA tests were, in fact, true-positives and that the cultures and FATs were falsely negative. A patient specimen was considered positive when it was positive by virus culture, FAT, or blocking assay. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the ELISA test were 88, 94, and 95%, respectively. Centrifugation of nasal washings raised the sensitivity from 88 to 92% but reduced the specificity from 94 to 81%. We conclude that the Ortho ELISA test of uncentrifuged nasal washings is more sensitive than virus culture or indirect FAT and is highly specific.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Diseases/microbiology , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/analysis , Antigens, Viral/analysis , Child , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay/methods , Fluorescent Antibody Technique , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Nasopharyngeal Diseases/diagnosis , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Respiratory Syncytial Viruses/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...