Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Infect Control ; 37(6): 478-83, 2009 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19216003

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditional laundry decontamination relies on thermal disinfection that degrades textiles. We investigated the ability of a novel copper-based biocidal compound, CuWB50, to assist in the decontamination of swatches purposely contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter during "real-life" low-temperature machine washing with and without 2 commercial detergents. METHODS: Contaminated and noncontaminated swatches were attached to ballast sheets and washed in cold water for 15 minutes in an industrial Electrolux machine. We assessed colony-forming units (cfu) on the swatches and in the postwash water. RESULTS: Low-temperature machine washing produced only partial reductions in viable methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus baumannii counts on swatches and resulted in cross contamination of other swatches in the same wash. Washing with CuWB50 alone at high concentration (100 mg/L), however, resulted in superior decontamination compared with water alone, whereas washing with a combination of detergent and CuWB50 at low concentration (5 mg/L) yielded synergistic and complete decontamination of swatches and postwash water. CONCLUSION: Our results show highly effective laundry decontamination using CuWB50 with detergent at low temperature and are timely both in terms of rising energy costs and textile degradation issues.


Subject(s)
Acinetobacter calcoaceticus/drug effects , Copper/pharmacology , Decontamination/methods , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Temperature , Textiles/microbiology , Acinetobacter calcoaceticus/isolation & purification , Colony Count, Microbial , Humans , Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification
2.
Am J Infect Control ; 37(4): 322-6, 2009 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19118920

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hand cleanliness is important in hospital infection control, but skin irritation from frequent alcohol-based hand rub use reduces compliance. We have compared a new copper biocide/Aloe vera-based biocidal hand rub (Xgel) with 7 commercially available hand rubs. METHODS: Hand rubs were cultured with human skin cells for 24 hours after which cytotoxicity was assessed using the sulforhodamine B assay. The EN 12054 bacterial suspension test protocol was used to assess biocidal activity of 2 of the least cytotoxic hand rubs (Xgel and Purell). RESULTS: Hand rubs had 50% cytotoxic concentrations ranging from >10% to <0.1% vol/vol. In the EN12054 assay, Xgel reduced colony forming units (CFU) by >10(8) with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Acinetobacter in 1 minute, whereas Purell only reduced CFU by 10(4) and 10(5), respectively. Purell was ineffective against C difficile spores, whereas Xgel produced a 3 x 10(3) reduction in CFU. CONCLUSION: The hand rubs had a wide range of cytotoxicity values for human skin cells, with Xgel being the least cytotoxic to human skin cells. In the EN 12054 bacterial suspension test, Xgel was more effective than Purell against all organisms tested. It should be noted that these in vitro results may not translate into clinical differences.


Subject(s)
Alcohols/pharmacology , Anti-Infective Agents, Local/pharmacology , Bacteria/drug effects , Copper/toxicity , Hand Disinfection/methods , Skin/drug effects , Administration, Cutaneous , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Line/drug effects , Colony Count, Microbial , Copper/chemistry , Disinfection/methods , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , Humans , Skin/cytology , Skin Irritancy Tests
3.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 60(2): 294-9, 2007 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17567632

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We investigated three novel highly charged copper-based inorganic biocidal formulations for their activity against organisms highly relevant to healthcare-associated infection. METHODS: The three copper-based formulations were tested: (i) against clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Legionella pneumophila, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus/baumannii (ACCB), glycopeptide-resistant Enterococcus and spores of Clostridium difficile in time-kill assays; (ii) for their ability to decontaminate ultramicrofibre (UMF) cloths; and (iii) for their cytotoxicity to human skin and intestinal epithelial cells. RESULTS: All three copper-based formulations were potently biocidal down to concentrations of 1 ppm for both stationary- and log-phase organisms, and they were all active against C. difficile spores. At 150 ppm, they achieved a complete (>6 log10) kill of MRSA and ACCB mostly within 1 h. This biocidal activity was not achieved by copper sulphate or the inorganic binders used in the formulations. All three copper-based formulations completely decontaminated UMF cloths containing MRSA, ACCB or C. difficile spores, suggesting that any of these copper-based formulations would be highly beneficial in the healthcare environment. All three copper-based formulations and copper sulphate were not cytotoxic to human epithelial cells up to concentrations of 100-200 ppm. CONCLUSIONS: All three of the novel copper-based biocidal formulations, but not their components (copper sulphate and inorganic binders), have potent activity against organisms highly relevant to healthcare-associated infections.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/drug effects , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Copper/chemistry , Copper/toxicity , Disinfectants/chemistry , Disinfectants/toxicity , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Survival/drug effects , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Colony Count, Microbial , Copper/adverse effects , Copper Sulfate/pharmacology , Disinfectants/adverse effects , Disinfectants/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Epithelial Cells/drug effects , HT29 Cells , Humans , Methicillin Resistance , Skin/cytology , Skin/drug effects , Spores, Bacterial/drug effects
4.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 56(6): 1000-18, 2005 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16293678

ABSTRACT

These evidence-based guidelines have been produced after a literature review of the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We have considered the detection of MRSA in screening samples and the detection of reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in S. aureus. Recommendations are given for the identification of S. aureus and for suitable methods of susceptibility testing and screening for MRSA and for S. aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides. These guidelines indicate what tests should be used but not when the tests are applicable, as aspects of this are dealt with in guidelines on control of MRSA. There are currently several developments in screening media and molecular methods. It is likely that some of our recommendations will require modification as the new methods become available.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Methicillin Resistance , Microbial Sensitivity Tests/methods , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureus/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Glycopeptides/pharmacology , Humans , Staphylococcus aureus/isolation & purification , United Kingdom
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...