Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Sensors (Basel) ; 22(5)2022 Feb 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35270971

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate use of CIED-generated Heart Failure Risk Score (HFRS) alerts in an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach to HF management. Methods: We undertook a prospective, single centre outcome study of patients implanted with an HFRS-enabled Medtronic CIED, generating a "high risk" alert between November 2018 and November 2020. All patients generating a "high risk" HFRS alert were managed within an integrated HF pathway. Alerts were shared with local HF teams, prompting patient contact and appropriate intervention. Outcome data on health care utilisation (HCU) and mortality were collected. A validated questionnaire was completed by the HF teams to obtain feedback. Results: 367 "High risk" alerts were noted in 188 patients. The mean patient age was 70 and 49% had a Charlson Comorbidity Score of >6. Mean number of alerts per patients was 1.95 and 44 (23%) of patients had >3 "high risk" alerts in the follow up period. Overall, 75 (39%) patients were hospitalised in the 4−6-week period of the alert; 53 (28%) were unplanned of which 24 (13%) were for decompensated HF. A total of 33 (18%) patients died in the study period. Having three or more alerts significantly increased the risk of hospitalisation for heart failure (HR 2.5, CI 1.1−5.6 p = 0.03). The feedback on the pathway was positive. Conclusions: Patients with "high risk" alerts are co-morbid and have significant HCU. An integrated approach can facilitate timely risk stratification and intervention. Intervention in these patients is not limited to HF alone and provides the opportunity for holistic management of this complex cohort.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Humans , Cohort Studies , Heart Failure/therapy , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors
2.
Am J Med ; 134(4): 482-489, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33010226

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We evaluated whether the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-COV-2) pandemic was associated with changes in the pattern of acute cardiovascular admissions across European centers. METHODS: We set-up a multicenter, multinational, pan-European observational registry in 15 centers from 12 countries. All consecutive acute admissions to emergency departments and cardiology departments throughout a 1-month period during the COVID-19 outbreak were compared with an equivalent 1-month period in 2019. The acute admissions to cardiology departments were classified into 5 major categories: acute coronary syndrome, acute heart failure, arrhythmia, pulmonary embolism, and other. RESULTS: Data from 54,331 patients were collected and analyzed. Nine centers provided data on acute admissions to emergency departments comprising 50,384 patients: 20,226 in 2020 compared with 30,158 in 2019 (incidence rate ratio [IRR] with 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.66 [0.58-0.76]). The risk of death at the emergency departments was higher in 2020 compared to 2019 (odds ratio [OR] with 95% CI: 4.1 [3.0-5.8], P < 0.0001). All 15 centers provided data on acute cardiology departments admissions: 3007 patients in 2020 and 4452 in 2019; IRR (95% CI): 0.68 (0.64-0.71). In 2020, there were fewer admissions with IRR (95% CI): acute coronary syndrome: 0.68 (0.63-0.73); acute heart failure: 0.65 (0.58-0.74); arrhythmia: 0.66 (0.60-0.72); and other: 0.68(0.62-0.76). We found a relatively higher percentage of pulmonary embolism admissions in 2020: odds ratio (95% CI): 1.5 (1.1-2.1), P = 0.02. Among patients with acute coronary syndrome, there were fewer admissions with unstable angina: 0.79 (0.66-0.94); non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: 0.56 (0.50-0.64); and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 0.78 (0.68-0.89). CONCLUSION: In the European centers during the COVID-19 outbreak, there were fewer acute cardiovascular admissions. Also, fewer patients were admitted to the emergency departments with 4 times higher death risk at the emergency departments.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiology Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Myocardial Ischemia , Patient Admission , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Europe/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Ischemia/epidemiology , Myocardial Ischemia/therapy , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Admission/trends , Registries/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2
3.
J Med Econ ; 21(3): 294-300, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29171319

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Infection is a major complication of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) therapy that usually requires device extraction and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The TYRX Antibacterial Envelope is a polypropylene mesh that stabilizes the CIED and elutes minocycline and rifampin to reduce the risk of post-operative infection. METHODS: A decision tree was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of TYRX vs standard of care (SOC) following implantation of four CIED device types. The model was parameterized for a UK National Health Service perspective. Probabilities were derived from the literature. Resource use included drug acquisition and administration, hospitalization, adverse events, device extraction, and replacement. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated from costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: Over a 12-month time horizon, TYRX was less costly and more effective than SOC when utilized in patients with an ICD or CRT-D. TYRX was associated with ICERs of £46,548 and £21,768 per QALY gained in patients with an IPG or CRT-P, respectively. TYRX was cost-effective at a £30,000 threshold at baseline probabilities of infection exceeding 1.65% (CRT-D), 1.95% (CRT-P), 1.87% (IPG), and 1.38% (ICD). LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Device-specific infection rates for high-risk patients were not available in the literature and not used in this analysis, potentially under-estimating the impact of TYRX in certain devices. Nevertheless, TYRX is associated with a reduction in post-operative infection risk relative to SOC, resulting in reduced healthcare resource utilization at an initial cost. The ICERs are below the accepted willingness-to-pay thresholds used by UK decision-makers. TYRX, therefore, represents a cost-effective prevention option for CIED patients at high-risk of post-operative infection.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Heart Failure/surgery , Infection Control/methods , Prostheses and Implants/microbiology , Surgical Mesh/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Mortality/trends , Quality of Life , United Kingdom
4.
Eur Heart J ; 38(30): 2352-2360, 2017 Aug 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28575235

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Remote management of heart failure using implantable electronic devices (REM-HF) aimed to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of remote monitoring (RM) of heart failure in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 29 September 2011 and 31 March 2014, we randomly assigned 1650 patients with heart failure and a CIED to active RM or usual care (UC). The active RM pathway included formalized remote follow-up protocols, and UC was standard practice in nine recruiting centres in England. The primary endpoint in the time to event analysis was the 1st event of death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons. Secondary endpoints included death from any cause, death from cardiovascular reasons, death from cardiovascular reasons and unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization, unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization, and unplanned hospitalization. REM-HF is registered with ISRCTN (96536028). The mean age of the population was 70 years (range 23-98); 86% were male. Patients were followed for a median of 2.8 years (range 0-4.3 years) completing on 31 January 2016. Patient adherence was high with a drop out of 4.3% over the course of the study. The incidence of the primary endpoint did not differ significantly between active RM and UC groups, which occurred in 42.4 and 40.8% of patients, respectively [hazard ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.18; P = 0.87]. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to any of the secondary endpoints or the time to the primary endpoint components. CONCLUSION: Among patients with heart failure and a CIED, RM using weekly downloads and a formalized follow up approach does not improve outcomes.


Subject(s)
Defibrillators, Implantable , Heart Failure/therapy , Remote Consultation , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/methods , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Ambulatory , Patient Compliance
5.
J Med Econ ; 20(7): 732-739, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28418265

ABSTRACT

AIM: To estimate health resource utilization (HRU) associated with the management of pacemaker complications in various healthcare systems. METHODS: Electrophysiologists (EPs) from four geographical regions (Western Europe, Australia, Japan, and North America) were invited to participate. Survey questions focused on HRU in the management of three chronic pacemaker complications (i.e. pacemaker infections requiring extraction, lead fractures/insulation breaches requiring replacement, and upper extremity deep venous thrombosis [DVT]). Panelists completed a maximum of two web-based surveys (iterative rounds). Mean, median values, and interquartile ranges were calculated and used to establish consensus. RESULTS: Overall, 32 and 29 panelists participated in the first and second rounds of the Delphi panel, respectively. Consensus was reached on treatment and HRU associated with a typical pacemaker implantation and complications. HRU was similar across regions, except for Japan, where panelists reported the longest duration of hospital stay in all scenarios. Infections were the most resource-intensive complications and were characterized by intravenous antibiotics days of 9.6?13.5 days and 21.3?29.2 days for pocket and lead infections respectively; laboratory and diagnostic tests, and system extraction and replacement procedures. DVT, on the other hand, was the least resource intensive complication. LIMITATIONS: The results of the panel represent the views of the respondents who participated and may not be generalizable outside of this panel. The surveys were limited in scope and, therefore, did not include questions on management of acute complications (e.g. hematoma, pneumothorax). CONCLUSIONS: The Delphi technique provided a reliable and efficient approach to estimating resource utilization associated with chronic pacemaker complications. Estimates from the Delphi panel can be used to generate costs of pacemaker complications in various regions.


Subject(s)
Global Health , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Pacemaker, Artificial/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/economics , Delphi Technique , Equipment Failure , Humans , Prosthesis-Related Infections/economics , Prosthesis-Related Infections/epidemiology , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Venous Thrombosis/economics , Venous Thrombosis/epidemiology
6.
Europace ; 19(10): 1624-1629, 2017 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28340242

ABSTRACT

Minor surgical procedures are increasingly being performed as outpatient procedures in settings outside hospital operating rooms (ORs). In electrophysiology, the recent miniaturization of insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) has enabled the routine insertion of the device as a minimally invasive procedure without the need of a catheter OR. However, a shift to office-based environments for minor surgical procedures is associated with some concerns, particularly with respect to patient- and procedure-related safety in the new setting. In the present document, the authors provide practical advice on facilities, practices, and adaptations necessary when performing ICM insertions in office settings, based on available recommendations as well as their own experience with the use of the novel Reveal LINQ ICM. The main differences from in-hospital implant settings are simplified requirements of room, equipment, and insertion procedures, while ensuring and maintaining an adequate, sterile environment. Patient selection is important: certain groups of patients are recommended to be treated in the catheter OR (e.g. those at increased risk for bleeding or very frail elderly individuals). Insertion in alternative positions, as is sometimes performed for cosmetic reasons, should be referred to dedicated hospitals. Quality assurance and internal quality control are critical in the new procedural landscape, and it is important not to trivialize minor surgical procedures. Operators' sharing of experiences and lessons learned, e.g. in the form of registries, should be encouraged.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular/instrumentation , Telemetry/instrumentation , Transducers , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Ambulatory Care/standards , Ambulatory Surgical Procedures/standards , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Cardiac Surgical Procedures/standards , Clinical Decision-Making , Clinical Protocols , Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular/standards , Equipment Design , Humans , Miniaturization , Patient Safety , Predictive Value of Tests , Quality Control , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Risk Factors , Telemetry/standards , Transducers/standards
7.
Am Heart J ; 150(5): 983, 2005 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16290976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of patients with mild-moderate chronic heart failure (CHF) over a long-term follow-up period is more difficult to predict than for patients with more severe CHF in the short term. This study assessed the prognostic value of various indicators of cardiac pump function to gain insight into how different aspects of organ function impact upon prognosis. METHODS: Unselected, consecutive patients with CHF (n = 219, 166 men, mean [+/-SD] age 56 +/- 13 years) who underwent symptom limited cardiopulmonary treadmill exercise testing with noninvasive estimation of cardiac output using carbon dioxide rebreathing techniques were followed up for a median period of 8.6 +/- 1.0 years in survivors. Cardiac power output (CPO) was calculated from the product of cardiac output and mean arterial pressure and cardiac reserve was estimated by subtracting resting from peak exercise CPO or cardiac output (CO). RESULTS: All-cause mortality was 36% (78 deaths). Survivors had a significantly greater cardiac pumping reserve with the greatest difference seen in CPO reserve (+57%) and CO reserve (+49%) (both P < .001). Although various direct and indirect indicators of cardiac function were predictive of outcome on univariate analyses, multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model identified CO reserve to be the independent variable predictive of all-cause mortality, with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.682 (0.612-0.757, P < .001) for each L/min increase in cardiac output reserve. Survival at 10 years in patients with tertiles of good, moderate, or poor cardiac output reserve was 89%, 63%, and 36.1%, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this long-term follow-up study involving a cohort of unselected ambulatory patients with mild-moderate CHF, cardiac pumping reserve measured noninvasively by cardiopulmonary exercise testing was found to be the strongest independent predictor of prognosis.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/physiopathology , Chronic Disease , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...