ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Many patients with urolithiasis are seen acutely in the emergency department for initial treatment. In an effort to improve cost and quality of care increasing focus has been placed on shifting management of low acuity conditions from emergency departments to outpatient settings. One barrier to such initiatives is timely access to outpatient services. We established a telephone stone line to provide access to outpatient urological care of kidney stones and we report our initial experience. METHODS: A 24-hour dedicated telephone stone line was created with calls answered by dedicated staff. A computer program was created to track stone line calls and post-call care. We retrospectively analyzed all stone line calls received in a 4-year period with the focus on utilization and cost. An e-mail survey was performed to assess patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Between January 2009 and July 2013 the mean call volume was 2,107 per year. A significant distribution of calls was seen across all days and hours. Duration was less than 15 minutes in 7,761 calls (82%). Patients or family members placed 77% of calls and physicians placed 16%. As a result of a stone line call, 4,173 patients (76%) were seen by a urologist within 48 hours. Of the patients 88% reported satisfaction with the stone line. The mean annual cost of providing the telephone stone line was $51,873. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience demonstrates sustained utilization of and satisfaction with the telephone stone line. Further, stone line use results in timely outpatient evaluation in the majority of patients. Further analysis to assess for a cost benefit is ongoing.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Trunk reposition error (TRE) is a component of trunk control, yet has not been reported in acute stroke. The purpose of this study was to quantify TRE in acute stroke and report this with related rehabilitation outcomes. METHODS: Sixty subjects, 30 with acute stroke and 30 healthy controls, completed this study. Subjects with acute stroke were measured before and after an in-patient acute rehabilitation stay. MEASURES: TRE using an electromagnetic tracking device, Berg Balance Scale, Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke, and Functional Independence Measures. Pre-post measures were analyzed with paired t-tests. Between-group measures were analyzed with independent w-tests. RESULTS: There were significant between group differences (acute stroke vs. controls) for all functional outcome measures (P < 0.001) and for three-dimensional TRE (P = 0.001). There were significant improvements in all functional outcome measures following an in-patient rehabilitation stay (P < 0.001). All measures of TRE reduced but did not achieve significance. CONCLUSION: TRE was not as severely impaired as anticipated and was variable based on plane of measure. Time in a rehabilitation setting produced significant improvements in functional outcomes but TRE improvements were not as robust. These results indicate a need for further investigation of the strength of the interrelationship between TRE and function.
