Surgical outcome and treatment trends in 1289 infants with micrognathia: a multicenter cohort.

BACKGROUND: Studies of infants with micrognathia, especially Robin Sequence (RS), are limited by its rarity and both phenotypic and diagnostic variability. Most knowledge of this condition is sourced from small, single-institution samples. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study including infants with micrognathia admitted to 38 Children's Hospital Neonatal Consortium centers from 2010-2020. Predictor variables included demographic data, birth characteristics, cleft and syndrome status. Outcome variables included length of stay (LOS), death, feeding or respiratory support, and secondary airway operations. RESULTS: 1289 infants with micrognathia had a surgery to correct upper airway obstruction. Mean age and weight at operation were 34.8±1.8 weeks and 3515.4±42 grams, respectively. A syndromic diagnosis was made in 150 (11.6%) patients, with Stickler (5.4%) and Treacher Collins Syndromes (2.2%) most common. Operations included: mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), 66.3%; tracheostomy, 25.4%; and tongue-lip adhesion (TLA), 8.3%. Tracheostomy patients had a lower birth weight, head circumference, gestational age, and APGAR scores. MDO patients were less likely to need a second airway operation compared to TLA patients (3.5%vs17.8%,p<0.001). The proportion of infants feeding exclusively orally at hospital discharge differed significantly, from most to least: MDO, TLA, tracheostomy. Hospital LOS was not statistically different for patients that had MDO and TLA, but was longer for those with primary tracheostomy. Mortality was low for all operations (0.5%). CONCLUSION: In this 1289 surgical patient cohort, MDO was associated with shorter hospital stay, improved oral feeding, and lower rates of secondary airway operations. Prospective multi-center studies are necessary to support these conclusions.

Dorsal Augmentation: A Review of Current Graft Options.

Background: Dorsal augmentation is one of the more complication-prone procedures in rhinoplasty, demanding ample skill and experience to produce an aesthetic and functional result. Numerous autologous grafts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplastic materials have been attempted for augmentation with varying success. Each graft material has its own unique properties that require varying surgical intricacies. The relative risks and benefits of these strategies and materials are also variable and must be weighed. Alloplastic implants are commonly used in eastern countries, but, due to different patient populations and complication profiles, have found less acceptance among western surgeons. Methods: A PubMed search was done using the terms "dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty," "liquid rhinoplasty," and "grafts used for rhinoplasty." Publication dates ranging from 1957-2022 were included. Abstracts were screened for relevance, and references from each article were reviewed to identify further articles. Chapters on dorsal augmentation from two key rhinoplasty textbooks were also reviewed. Results: A total of 79 articles and 2 textbooks were formally screened; of these, 65 resources were included. Findings were grouped under the headings "facial analysis," "ethnic factors in graft selection," "graft characteristics," "septal cartilage," "auricular cartilage," "costal cartilage," "diced cartilage grafts," "bone grafts," "soft tissue grafts," "nonsurgical/liquid rhinoplasty," and "alloplastic implants." Conclusions: Current dorsal augmentation literature focuses on retrospective studies and expert experiences. There are limited quantitative and prospective studies present to delineate an ideal graft. With consistently advancing technology and knowledge of facial aesthetics, a surgeon must maintain a thorough understanding of the current graft and implant options to offer a specialized treatment plan for each deformity and patient.

Cleft Palate Fistula: A Review.

Background: The development of postoperative oronasal fistulae (ONF) is a complication that plagues all cleft surgeons to varying degrees. There is extensive literature discussing the incidence, functional impact, and treatment of ONF. The goal of this article is to provide an extensive review of the literature discussing the incidence, causative factors, functional impact, classification systems, and treatment of ONF. Methods: A literature review was performed using PubMed using the Medical Subject Heading terms "cleft palate" AND "fistula" OR "palatal fistula" OR "oronasal fistula". After review, a total of 356 articles were deemed relevant for this study. Results: Information regarding ONF care, prevention, and management in patients with cleft palate was collected from the articles included in this review. Treatment of ONF remains a challenging problem as there is not a consensus in the available literature on the best palatoplasty techniques for their prevention and treatment. A myriad of reconstructive options and adjunctive therapies exist, and their use is guided by the size and location of the fistula. Conclusions: Fistula treatment should be tailored to the specific needs of the patient, and consideration must be given to not only the ONF itself but also the patient's stage of growth and development. Large-scale, multicenter studies are needed in which ONF are described using standardized nomenclature, and improved outcomes reporting is necessary to better define an algorithm for a truly holistic approach to palate surgery and reduce the incidence of palatal fistula.

Design and Validation of a 3D Printed Cranio-Facial Simulator: A Novel Tool for Surgical Education.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of current 3D printing technology to generate a craniofacial bony and soft tissue anatomical model for use in simulating the performance of a fronto-orbital advancement (FOA) osteotomy and then to further assess the value of the model as an educational tool. DESIGN: Anatomic models were designed with a process of serial anatomic segmentation/design, 3D printing, dissection, and device refinement. A validation study was conducted with 5 junior and 5 senior plastic surgery residents. The validation study incorporated a multiple-choice Knowledge Assessment test (KA), an Objective Structured Assessment of Technical skills (OSATs), a Global Rating Scale (GRS) and a Michigan Standard Simulation Experience Scale (MiSSES). We compared the scores of both the junior and senior residents and compared junior resident scores, before and after viewing a lecture/demonstration. RESULTS: MiSSES showed high face validity with a score of 85.1/90, signifying high satisfaction with the simulator learning experience. Simulation and the lecture/demonstration improved the junior resident average KA score from 5.6/10 to 9.6/10 (P = .02), OSATs score from 32.4/66 to 64.4/66 (P < .001) and GRS score from 13.9/35 to 27.5/35 (P < .001). The senior residents OSATs score of 56.3/66 was higher than the pre-lecture juniors (32.4/66) (P < .001), but lower than the post-lecture juniors (64.4/66) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: We have successfully fabricated a 3D printed craniofacial simulator capable of being used as an educational tool alongside traditional surgical training. Next steps would be improving soft tissue realism, inclusion of patient and disease specific anatomy and creation of models for other surgical specialties.