The assessment of bladder cancer resectability with bimanual palpation: A prospective study in laparoscopy and open cystectomy patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the value of examination under anesthesia (EUA) in the assessment of bladder resectability during cystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included consecutive patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer at a single center between June 2017 and October 2020. EUA was conducted before cystectomy by two urologists who assessed the bladder for limited mobility. One examiner was blinded to the imaging results. Soft tissue surgical margin status in the pathological evaluation of a cystectomy specimen served as a measure of resectability. We used multivariable logistic regression models to assess whether EUA performed by blinded or non-blinded examiners is associated with soft tissue positive surgical margins (PSMs) and to calculate the fraction of new information added by such an examination in addition to selected clinical variables. RESULTS: Among the 134 patients analyzed, limited bladder mobility was indicated by the blinded and non-blinded examiners in 23 (17.2%) and 21 (15.7%) cases, respectively. PSMs were identified in 22 (16.4%) patients, more often in patients with limited bladder mobility as assessed by the blinded (odds ratio [OR] 6.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-24.2) and non-blinded examiners (OR 12.9; 95% CI, 2.9-57.5). The fraction of new information added by the blinded and non-blinded examiners was 48.6% and 57.7%, respectively. The enrichment of patients who underwent pure laparoscopic cystectomy (n = 102; 76%) and the inclusion of patients for emergent surgery may limit the generalizability of our findings. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of limited bladder mobility during preoperative EUA yielded prognostic information on surgical margin status. Our findings suggest that EUA has the potential to provide valuable insights in the assessment of bladder resectability. However, further research in a larger cohort of patients is warranted to validate and expand on these findings.

Is right coronary artery chronic total vessel occlusion impacting the surgical revascularization results of patients with multivessel disease? A retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is common in the presence of other significantly narrowed coronary arteries. The impact of total occlusion and its association with completeness of revascularization on patients with multivessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) remains largely unknown. AIM: The aim of our study was to compare CABG operation characteristics, as well as 30-day mortality, incidence of post-operative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) between patients with and without CTO in right coronary artery (RCA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 156 consecutive patients were included in the analysis. CTO of RCA or right posterior descending artery (RPD) was diagnosed in 57 patients (CTO-RCA group). Coronary stenosis without CTO in RCA was diagnosed in 99 patients (nonCTO-RCA group). Baseline characteristics were comparable in both groups. RESULTS: The majority of patients had class II (49.1% vs. 46%, p = 0.86) or class III (42.1% vs. 43%, p = 1.0) Canadian Cardiovascular Society grading system symptoms. Patients in the CTO-RCA group had in average 2.2 grafts implanted, as opposed to 2.4 grafts in patients in the nonCTO-RCA group (p = 0.003). Graft to the RCA was performed in 40.3% patients in the CTO-RCA group and in 81% patients in the nonCTO-RCA group (p = 0.001). The 30-day mortality from any cause or cardiac cause did not differ between groups (7% vs. 2%, p = 0.14 and 3.5% vs. 2%, p = 0.57 respectively). In a multivariate analysis CTO in RCA or RPD and peripheral artery disease were independent predictors of post-operative MACCE (7.9 (1.434-43.045) p = 0.02; 18.8 (3.451-101.833) p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Chronic total occlusion of RCA was found to be associated with smaller number of grafts performed during the CABG procedure. Although mortality between patients in the CTO-RCA and nonCTO-RCA groups did not differ, patients in the CTO-RCA group had higher incidence of post-operative MACCE.

Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass as a safe method of surgical revascularization. The step towards hybrid procedures.

INTRODUCTION: Coronary artery disease is nowadays responsible for approximately 15% of hospitalizations in Poland. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) represents an attractive alternative to a sternotomy, and at the same time provides better life quality and facilitates quick rehabilitation. AIM: To evaluate whether MIDCAB can be performed with similar early and mid-term results as off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) and therefore can be considered as a safe stage in hybrid revascularization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 73 consecutive patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending artery) between 2013 and 2016 in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Transplantology, John Paul II Hospital, Krakow. Thirty-eight (52.1%) MIDCAB and 35 (47.9%) OPCAB patients were enrolled. RESULTS: Short-term results did not significantly differ between groups and similar 30-day mortality was observed (MIDCAB 2.6% vs. OPCAB 2.9%, p = 1). The median follow-up period was 21 months. There were no statistical differences in terms of overall survival or cardiac mortality between groups (94.7% vs. 88.6%, p = 0.42; 2.6% vs. 2.9%, p = 1, respectively). The rate of hospitalization due to cardiac causes was similar in both groups (7.9% vs. 5.1%, p = 1) and there were no differences in current exacerbation of angina or heart failure, with median NYHA class I and CCS class I in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher technical difficulty, MIDCAB procedures can be performed with similar safety results as OPCAB procedures. No differences in terms of mortality, repeat revascularization or recurrent angina are observed.