ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Steady Health's novel virtual care model incorporates continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and a multidisciplinary approach to timely person-centered diabetes care. OBJECTIVE: This real-world retrospective case series explores the early glycemic outcomes of its patients with uncontrolled diabetes. METHODS: All patients of Steady Health who had an initial time in range (TIR) below 70% from their first 4 weeks of available CGM data and who had completed onboarding by February 2021 were included in this analysis. We compared the change in TIR, time below range, and average blood glucose from their first 4 weeks with their latest 4 weeks of available CGM data. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values at baseline and at the end of the study were also compared. Patients completed a questionnaire assessing their satisfaction with Steady Health's intervention. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients (n=35, 66% with type 1 diabetes; n=44, 83% treated with insulin) were included in this analysis. This cohort had a median baseline TIR of 53.0% (IQR 40.9%, 61.7%) and saw a median change in TIR of +16.6% (IQR +6.0%, +27.9%; P<.001) over a median duration of care of 11 months, amounting to nearly 4 more hours spent between 70 to 180 mg/dL a day. Of the 27 patients who had both baseline and follow-up HbA1c results, their median baseline HbA1c was 8.6% (IQR 7.5%, 11.4%; 70 mmol/mol), while their median change in HbA1c was -1.2% (IQR -2.6%, -0.2%; P=.001). Importantly, these glycemic improvements were achieved with a median decrease in the time below range by -0.3% (IQR -1.1%, 0.0%; P<.001), regardless of whether patients were started on an automated insulin delivery system. A total of 40 (75.5%) patients improved TIR by ≥5%, and 27 (50.9%) achieved TIR≥70% by the end of the study. Glycemic improvements were greatest among patients with the lowest baseline TIR and those who collaborated most intensively with Steady Health's clinicians. A total of 25 of these patients responded to a questionnaire assessing levels of satisfaction with their care, and all of them agreed that Steady Health had a positive impact on their diabetes management. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that patients with uncontrolled diabetes can achieve significant glycemic improvements by working with a virtual multidisciplinary care team that uses CGM to provide continuous clinical feedback and support.
ABSTRACT
Background: Osteopetrosis encompasses a group of rare metabolic bone diseases characterized by impaired osteoclast activity or development, resulting in high bone mineral density. Existing guidelines focus on treatment of the severe infantile forms with hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) but do not address the management of patients with less severe forms for whom HCT is not the standard of care. Therefore, our objective was to develop expert consensus guidelines for the management of these patients. Methods: A modified Delphi method was used to build consensus among participants of the Osteopetrosis Working Group, with responses to an anonymous online survey used to identify areas of agreement and conflict and develop a follow-up survey. The strength of recommendations and quality of evidence was graded using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Results: Consensus was found in the areas of diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment. We recommend relying on characteristic radiographic findings to make the diagnosis and found that genetic testing adds important information by identifying mutations associated with unique disease complications. We recommend ongoing monitoring for changes in mineral metabolism and other complications, including cranial nerve impingement, anemia, leukopenia, and dental disease. We suggest that calcitriol should not be used in high doses and instead recommend symptom-based supportive therapy for disease complications because noninfantile osteopetrosis has no effective treatment. Conclusions: Scarcity of published studies on osteopetrosis reduce the ability to develop evidence-based guidelines for the management of these patients. Expert opinion-based guidelines for this rare condition are nevertheless important to enable improved care.
