Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Front Public Health ; 10: 746591, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35309209

ABSTRACT

Background: Although there is a growing research base on low back pain, the bibliometric literature related to it is deficient. The aim of this study was to conduct a bibliometric and visualization analysis of low back pain and to provide a broad view of the current trends in LBP research and a potential guide in this discipline. Methods: The authors searched the Web of Science to extract publications regarding low back pain, and found a total of 12,249 publications during a period of 22 years, among which 12,242 were eligible. We classified and analyzed publications such as total citations, average citations per item, H-index, research types, countries/regions, institutions, and journals using standard bibliometric indicators. Bibliometric approaches (VOSviewer1.6.13 and CiteSpace 5.8.3) were also available for gathering information and explore the trends of research. Results: Conspicuously, over the past 22 years, an increasing number of scholars have specialized in the research of LBP, exerting the boom in articles. The largest number of document type was that of articles. Under modern conditions, regional distinction existed in the research of low back pain and developed countries preceded others. Research individuals and institutions were preoccupied by respective aspects. Visualization analysis provided objective information for potential collaborators and cooperative institutions. Furthermore, most burst keywords varied during different periods. Conclusions: The map of research on LBP obtained by our analysis is expected to help researchers to efficiently and effectively explore LBP.


Subject(s)
Low Back Pain , Bibliometrics , Humans
2.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 43: 101293, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33735636

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tension-type headache (TTH) is one of the most common primary headache diseases in the world and has a serious negative impact on the physical and mental health of patients. Tuina is now widely used to treat tension-type headaches. This article aims to systematically review the evidence about the effectiveness of Tuina on the effectiveness rate, pain intensity, and impact of headache in individuals with TTH. METHODS: Eight databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of Tuina were included in treatments for TTH. Cochrane Collaboration's tool was applied to evaluate the quality of the studies. Confidence in the effect estimates was determined with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. We use the software STATA 12.0 for meta-analysis and TSA software for test sequence analysis. RESULTS: Seven studies were included with a total sample of 1228 individuals. Meta-analysis results showed that Tuina was superior to drugs for improving the effectiveness rate (RR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.25 to 1.77, p < 0.01, low evidence). A visual analog scale (VAS) score of Tuina was significantly lower than that of drugs (WMD = -0.738, 95% CI: -1.128 to -0.349, p < 0.01, moderate evidence). The trial sequential analysis showed that the effectiveness of Tuina for TTH was accurate. Adverse events were tolerable. CONCLUSION: Tuina has a certain effect in treating tension headache. However, due to the low level of methodological quality included in the article, this conclusion should be considered cautiously. More studies are necessary to strengthen the evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of Tuina for subjects with TTH.


Subject(s)
Tension-Type Headache , Headache , Humans , Tension-Type Headache/drug therapy
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(50): e23751, 2020 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33327365

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A very large acceleration in clinical studies on the efficacy of fire needle to treat lumbar disc herniation (LDH) are increasing, while studies on the assessment of its efficacy are still lacking. Therefore, this study will demonstrate the efficacy of fire needle in the treatment of LDH combining with the meta-analysis. METHODS: The studies on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) will be searched at the databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WANFANG database (Chinese Medicine Premier), Chinese Scientific Journal Database (VIP), Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM), PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library from their inception to May 1, 2020. RESULTS: This authentic and multi-dimensional study will shed light on the referable information for the treatment of LDH with fire needle. CONCLUSION: This study will evaluate the efficacy of fire needle in the treatment of LDH. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (registration number CRD42020158596).


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Intervertebral Disc Degeneration/therapy , Intervertebral Disc Displacement/therapy , Lumbar Vertebrae , Humans , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Meta-Analysis as Topic
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(15): e15108, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30985666

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A large number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that acupuncture (ACU) has certain advantages over pharmacotherapies in the treatment of primary osteoporosis (POP). However, due to the diversity of ACU treatments, its relative effectiveness have not yet been studied and explained. Therefore, based on the network meta-analysis (NMA), this study will compare the differences in the efficacy of multiacupuncture in the treatment of POP, to provide a reference for clinical treatment. METHODS: We will search PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CHKD-CNKI), WANFANG database (Chinese Medicine Premier), Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM), and VIP for relevant RCTs of ACU treatments for POP, from their inceptions to January 2019. STATA 15.0 and GEMTC software will be used to perform a NMA. The evidence will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach and the type 1 error rate will be assessed by trial sequential analysis (TSA). RESULTS: The results of this review will be submitted to a recognized journal for publication. CONCLUSION: This proposed systematic review will evaluate the different advantages of various types of ACU in the treatment of POP. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO (registration number CRD42019122724).


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Osteoporosis/therapy , Humans , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Research Design , Meta-Analysis as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...