ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adequate cytology is limited by insufficient cytologists in a large-scale cervical cancer screening. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted cytology system in cervical cancer screening program. METHODS: We conducted a perspective cohort study within a population-based cervical cancer screening program for 0.7 million women, using a validated AI-assisted cytology system. For comparison, cytologists examined all slides classified by AI as abnormal and a randomly selected 10% of normal slides. Each woman with slides classified as abnormal by either AI-assisted or manual reading was diagnosed by colposcopy and biopsy. The outcomes were histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+). RESULTS: Finally, we recruited 703 103 women, of whom 98 549 were independently screened by AI and manual reading. The overall agreement rate between AI and manual reading was 94.7% (95% confidential interval [CI], 94.5%-94.8%), and kappa was 0.92 (0.91-0.92). The detection rates of CIN2+ increased with the severity of cytology abnormality performed by both AI and manual reading (Ptrend < 0.001). General estimated equations showed that detection of CIN2+ among women with ASC-H or HSIL by AI were significantly higher than corresponding groups classified by cytologists (for ASC-H: odds ratio [OR] = 1.22, 95%CI 1.11-1.34, P < .001; for HSIL: OR = 1.41, 1.28-1.55, P < .001). AI-assisted cytology was 5.8% (3.0%-8.6%) more sensitive for detection of CIN2+ than manual reading with a slight reduction in specificity. CONCLUSIONS: AI-assisted cytology system could exclude most of normal cytology, and improve sensitivity with clinically equivalent specificity for detection of CIN2+ compared with manual cytology reading. Overall, the results support AI-based cytology system for the primary cervical cancer screening in large-scale population.
