Efficacy and toxicity of carfilzomib- or bortezomib-based regimens for treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma is a clonal disorder of malignant plasma cells that comprises approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of carfilzomib- or bortezomib-based regimens for treatment of transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma by performing a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: Data mining was conducted in March 2022 across PubMed, EMBASE and ClinicalTrials.gov. All published RCTs which assessed efficacy and toxicity of carfilzomib-based regimens treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma when compared with a bortezomib-based regimens were included. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis showed that the overall response rate (ORR) (Odds ratio = 1.33, 95% CI 1.05-1.69, P = .02) was significantly higher in the carfilzomib-based regimens group than in the bortezomib-based regimens group. However, the difference in ORR did not translate into improvements in progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and complete response rate (CRR). Adverse events of grade 3 or worse that occurred with a higher incidence in the carfilzomib-based regimens group compared with the bortezomib-based regimens group were dyspnea, hypertension, acute kidney injury, and heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: The carfilzomib-based regimens did not improve PFS, OS and CRR compared with the bortezomib-based regimens in transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, and they showed higher toxicity.

Efficacy and safety of lenalidomide for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lenalidomide is effective for the treatment of low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with deletion 5q abnormalities. However, whether lenalidomide leads to a significant improvement in treatment response and overall survival (OS) in cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains controversial. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide in the treatment of AML. METHODS: Clinical studies were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Efficacy outcomes included overall response rate (ORR), complete remission (CR), and OS. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence of grade 3 and 4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in our meta-analysis; collectively these studies featured 407 AML patients. Pooled estimates for overall ORR and CR were 31% (95% CI: 26%-36%) and 21% (95% CI: 16%-27%), respectively. Thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, and infection were the most common grade 3 and 4 AEs. CONCLUSION: Lenalidomide may have some clinical activity in AML, but the population that would benefit from lenalidomide and incorporating lenalidomide into combination drug strategies need to be better defined.