Small airway dysfunction in patients with cough variant asthma: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cough variant asthma (CVA) is one of the special populations of asthma. The aim of the study was to compare small airways, the degree of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammatory subtypes between CVA and classic asthma (CA), and investigate the relationship between these markers to determine the accuracy as indicators of CVA. METHODS: A total of 825 asthmatic patients participated in the study and 614 were included. 614 patients underwent spirometry and a bronchial challenge with methacholine and 459 patients performed induction sputum cell test. RESULTS: The number of CVA patients showed less small airway dysfunction than those of CA patients (p < 0.005). The degree of small airways dysfunction was higher in the CA group compared with the CVA group (p < 0.001). Small airways dysfunction was severer in the eosinophilic airway inflammatory subtype compared with other subtypes (p < 0.05).The area under curve of MMEF, FEF50 and FEF75 (% predicted) was 0.615, 0.621, 0.606, respectively. 0.17mcg of PD20 and 4.7% of sputum eosinophils was the best diagnostic value for CVA with an AUC of 0.582 and 0.575 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The eosinophilic airway inflammatory subtype may be increased small airway dysfunction. The value of small airways, BHR and induction sputum cells in CVA prediction, which reflected significant, but not enough to be clinically useful.

Correlation between fractional exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophilia in exacerbations of COPD.

INTRODUCTION: Measurements of eosinophils in induced sputum and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are noninvasive biomarkers for assessing airway inflammation phenotypes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Nevertheless, the clinical application of the correlation between FeNO levels and sputum eosinophilia is controversial. The study aimed to investigate the correlation and predictive relationship between FeNO levels and sputum eosinophils in patients with COPD exacerbation. It also examined the relationship between FeNO levels and blood eosinophil percentage. METHODS: A total of 163 patients with COPD exacerbation were included in the cross-sectional study. All patients underwent the following on the same day: FeNO test, spirometry, bronchodilator reversibility test, induced sputum, and routine blood test. They were classified as eosinophilic group or noneosinophilic group based on sputum eosinophilic percentage (≥2.5%)/FeNO levels (≥32 parts per billion [ppb]). RESULTS: FeNO levels and blood eosinophilic percentage were higher in patients with sputum eosinophilia (n=62) compared to those without (31.35 ppb versus 21.43 ppb, P=0.015; 2.71% versus 0.98%, P<0.0001, respectively). Sputum eosinophilic percentage was higher with raised FeNO (n=34) compared to those with FeNO <32 ppb (5.12% versus 3.12%, P=0.007). Eosinophils in induced sputum correlated with both FeNO levels (ρ=0.221, P=0.005) and blood eosinophilic percentage (ρ=0.399, P<0.001). There was no relationship between FeNO and blood eosinophilic percentage. Blood eosinophilic percentage was predictive of sputum eosinophilia (95% confidence interval [CI] =0.65-0.81, P<0.001) at a cutoff point of 0.65% (sensitivity =73%, specificity =61.3%). FeNO levels were predictive of sputum eosinophilia (95% CI =0.53-3,071, P=0.012) at a cutoff point of 17.5 ppb (sensitivity =65.1%, specificity =56.4%). CONCLUSION: The clinical relevance of this study provides evidence that inflammatory biomarkers, including sputum eosinophilic percentage, FeNO level, and blood eosinophilic percentage, can be used to positively diagnose eosinophilic COPD. The FeNO level and blood eosinophilic counts/percentage, which determine an optimal cutoff for sputum eosinophilia, need more studies.

[Comparison of manual versus automatic titration in pressure determination for long-term therapy of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of automatic titration with that of manual titration. METHODS: A total of 58 patients with obstructive sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) diagnosed by overnight polysomnography at sleep center of First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University were studied between December 2010 and December 2012. Manual titration was performed under full polysmnography and auto-titration at home for 3-7 nights. RESULTS: There were 52 males and 6 females with an age range of (48 ± 11) years. CPAP pressure titrated by automatic device (10.0 ± 2.2) cm H2O (1 cm H2O = 0.098 kPa) was significantly higher than that titrated manually (7.5 ± 1.5) cm H2O (P = 0.000). Apnea-hyponea index decreased significantly from (54.0 ± 21.0) events/h pre-treatment to (3.8 ± 2.5) events/h post-treatment under manual titration (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: CPAP pressure titrated by automatic device is usually higher than that titrated manually. Manual titration should be performed if a patient can not tolerate the CPAP pressure titrated by an automatic device.