The implication of integrative multiple RNA modification-based subtypes in gastric cancer immunotherapy and prognosis.

Previous studies have focused on the impact of individual RNA modifications on tumor development. This study comprehensively investigated the effects of multiple RNA modifications, including m6A, alternative polyadenylation, pseudouridine, adenosine-to-inosine editing, and uridylation, on gastric cancer (GC). By analyzing 1,946 GC samples from eleven independent cohorts, we identified distinct clusters of RNA modification genes with varying survival rates and immunological characteristics. We assessed the chromatin activity of these RNA modification clusters through regulon enrichment analysis. A prognostic model was developed using Stepwise Regression and Random Survival Forest algorithms and validated in ten independent datasets. Notably, the low-risk group showed a more favorable prognosis and positive response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy. Single-cell RNA sequencing confirmed the abundant expression of signature genes in B cells and plasma cells. Overall, our findings shed light on the potential significance of multiple RNA modifications in GC prognosis, stemness development, and chemotherapy resistance.

Comprehensive analysis of autophagy-related clusters and individual risk model for immunotherapy response prediction in gastric cancer.

Introduction: Autophagy can be triggered by oxidative stress and is a double-edged sword involved in the progression of multiple malignancies. However, the precise roles of autophagy on immune response in gastric cancer (GC) remain clarified. Methods: We endeavor to explore the novel autophagy-related clusters and develop a multi-gene signature for predicting the prognosis and the response to immunotherapy in GC. A total of 1505 patients from eight GC cohorts were categorized into two subtypes using consensus clustering. We compare the differences between clusters by the multi-omics approach. Cox and LASSO regression models were used to construct the prognostic signature. Results: Two distinct clusters were identified. Compared with cluster 2, the patients in cluster 1 have favorable survival outcomes and lower scores for epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). The two subtypes are further characterized by high heterogeneity concerning immune cell infiltration, somatic mutation pattern, and pathway activity by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). We obtained 21 autophagy-related differential expression genes (DEGs), in which PTK6 amplification and BCL2/CDKN2A deletion were highly prevalent. The four-gene (PEA15, HSPB8, BNIP3, and GABARAPL1) risk signature was further constructed with good predictive performance and validated in 3 independent datasets including our local Tianjin cohort. The risk score was proved to be independent prognostic factor. A prognostic nomogram showed robust validity of GC survival. The risk score was significantly associated with immune cell infiltration status, tumor mutation burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and immune checkpoint molecules. Furthermore, the model was efficient for predicting the response to tumor-targeted agent and immunotherapy and verified by the IMvigor210 cohort. This model is also capable of discriminating between low and high-risk patients receiving chemotherapy. Conclusion: Altogether, our exploratory research on the landscape of autophagy-related patterns may shed light on individualized therapies and prognosis in GC.

The integrated landscape of eRNA in gastric cancer reveals distinct immune subtypes with prognostic and therapeutic relevance.

The comprehensive regulation effect of eRNA on tumor immune cell infiltration and the outcome remains obscure. We comprehensively identify the eRNA-mediated immune infiltration patterns of gastric cancer (GC) samples. We creatively proposed a random forest machine-learning (ML) algorithm to map eRNA to mRNA expression patterns. The eRNA score was constructed using principal component analysis algorithms and validated in an independent cohort. Three subtypes with distinct eRNA expression patterns were determined in GC. There were significant differences between the three subtypes in the overall survival rate, immune cell infiltration characteristics, and immunotherapy response indicators. The patients in the high eRNA score group have a higher overall survival rate and might benefit from immunotherapy. This work revealed that eRNA regulation might be a new prognostic index and might offer a potential biomarker in the response of immunotherapy. Evaluating the eRNA regulation manner of GC will contribute to guiding more effective immunotherapy strategies.

Identification of an m6A Regulators-Mediated Prognosis Signature For Survival Prediction and Its Relevance to Immune Infiltration in Melanoma.

Despite robust evidence for the role of m6A in cancer development and progression, its association with immune infiltration and survival outcomes in melanoma remains obscure. Here, we aimed to develop an m6A-related risk signature to improve prognostic and immunotherapy responder prediction performance in the context of melanoma. We comprehensively analyzed the m6A cluster and immune infiltration phenotypes of public datasets. The TCGA (n = 457) and eleven independent melanoma cohorts (n = 758) were used as the training and validation datasets, respectively. We identified two m6A clusters (m6A-clusterA and m6A-clusterB) based on the expression pattern of m6A regulators via unsupervised consensus clustering. IGF2BP1 (7.49%), KIAA1429 (7.06%), and YTHDC1 (4.28%) were the three most frequently mutated genes. There was a correlation between driver genes mutation statuses and the expression of m6A regulators. A significant difference in tumor-associated immune infiltration between two m6A clusters was detected. Compared with m6A-clusterA, the m6A-clusterB was characterized by a lower immune score and immune cell infiltration but higher mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi). An m6A-related risk signature consisting of 12 genes was determined via Cox regression analysis and divided the patients into low- and high-risk groups (IL6ST, MBNL1, NXT2, EIF2A, CSGALNACT1, C11orf58, CD14, SPI1, NCCRP1, BOK, CD74, PAEP). A nomogram was developed for the prediction of the survival rate. Compared with the high-risk group, the low-risk group was characterized by high expression of immune checkpoints and immunophenoscore (IPS), activation of immune-related pathways, and more enriched in immune cell infiltrations. The low-risk group had a favorable prognosis and contained the potential beneficiaries of the immune checkpoint blockade therapy and verified by the IMvigor210 cohort (n = 298). The m6A-related signature we have determined in melanoma highlights the relationships between m6A regulators and immune cell infiltration. The established risk signature was identified as a promising clinical biomarker of melanoma.

Immune Infiltration Subtypes Characterization and Identification of Prognosis-Related lncRNAs in Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction.

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) has markedly increased worldwide. However, the precise etiology of AEG is still unclear, and the therapeutic options thus remain limited. Growing evidence has implicated long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in cancer immunomodulation. This study aimed to examine the tumor immune infiltration status and assess the prognostic value of immune-related lncRNAs in AEG. Using the ESTIMATE method and single-sample GSEA, we first evaluated the infiltration level of 28 immune cell types in AEG samples obtained from the TCGA dataset (N=201). Patients were assigned into high- and low-immune infiltration subtypes based on the immune cell infiltration's enrichment score. GSEA and mutation pattern analysis revealed that these two immune infiltration subtypes had distinct phenotypes. We identified 1470 differentially expressed lncRNAs in two immune infiltration subtypes. From these differentially expressed lncRNAs, six prognosis-related lncRNAs were selected using the Cox regression analysis. Subsequently, an immune risk signature was constructed based on combining the values of the six prognosis-associated lncRNAs expression levels and multiple regression coefficients. To determine the risk model's prognostic capability, we performed a series of survival analyses with Kaplan-Meier methods, Cox proportional hazards regression models, and the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The results indicated that the immune-related risk signature could be an independent prognostic factor with a significant predictive value in patients with AEG. Furthermore, the immune-related risk signature can effectively predict the response to immunotherapy and chemotherapy in AEG patients. In conclusion, the proposed immune-related lncRNA prognostic signature is reliable and has high survival predictive value for patients with AEG and is a promising potential biomarker for immunotherapy.

Characterization of Two Ferroptosis Subtypes With Distinct Immune Infiltration and Gender Difference in Gastric Cancer.

Background: Iron is an essential nutrient involved in the redox cycle and the formation of free radicals. The reprogramming of iron metabolism is the main link to tumor cell survival. Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death associated with cancer; the characteristics of ferroptosis in cancers are still uncertain. This study aimed to explore the application value and gender difference of ferroptosis in prognosis and immune prediction to provide clues for targeted therapy of gastric cancer. Methods: We comprehensively evaluated the ferroptosis levels of 1,404 gastric cancer samples from six independent GC cohorts based on ferroptosis-related specific genes and systematically correlated ferroptosis with immune cell infiltrating and gender characteristics. The ferroptosis score was constructed to quantify the ferroptosis levels of individual tumors using principal component analysis (PCA) algorithms. Results: We identified two distinct ferroptosis subtypes in gastric cancer, namely Subtype-A and Subtype-B. We found that male patients in Subtype-B had the worst prognosis in contrast with the other groups. Three sex hormone receptors (AR, ER, and PR) in Subtype-B tumor patients were higher than in Subtype-A tumor patients in GC, while the HER2 displayed an opposite trend. We developed a risk model termed ferroptosis score to evaluate ferroptosis levels within individual tumors. The low-ferroptosis score group was characterized by activation of immune cells and increased mutation burden, which is also linked to increased neoantigen load and enhanced response to anti-PD-1/L1 immunotherapy. The patients with a low-ferroptosis score showed a high microsatellite instability status (MSI-H) and had a higher response to immunotherapy. Furthermore, the patients with low-ferroptosis scores have a lower estimated IC50 in the several chemotherapy drugs, including paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and methotrexate. Conclusions: We revealed that sex hormone receptors and immune cell infiltration were markedly different between ferroptosis subtypes in GC patients. The results suggested that gender difference may be critical when the ferroptosis-related strategy is applied in GC treatment. Further, ferroptosis levels were identified with an extreme variety of prognosis and tumor immune characteristics, which might benefit GC individualized treatment.