Automatic planning for functional lung avoidance radiotherapy based on function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization.

Objective.This study aims to develop a fully automatic planning framework for functional lung avoidance radiotherapy (AP-FLART).Approach.The AP-FLART integrates a dosimetric score-based beam angle selection method and a meta-optimization-based plan optimization method, both of which incorporate lung function information to guide dose redirection from high functional lung (HFL) to low functional lung (LFL). It is applicable to both contour-based FLART (cFLART) and voxel-based FLART (vFLART) optimization options. A cohort of 18 lung cancer patient cases underwent planning-CT and SPECT perfusion scans were collected. AP-FLART was applied to generate conventional RT (ConvRT), cFLART, and vFLART plans for all cases. We compared automatic against manual ConvRT plans as well as automatic ConvRT against FLART plans, to evaluate the effectiveness of AP-FLART. Ablation studies were performed to evaluate the contribution of function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization to dose redirection.Main results.Automatic ConvRT plans generated by AP-FLART exhibited similar quality compared to manual counterparts. Furthermore, compared to automatic ConvRT plans, HFL mean dose,V20, andV5were significantly reduced by 1.13 Gy (p< .001), 2.01% (p< .001), and 6.66% (p< .001) respectively for cFLART plans. Besides, vFLART plans showed a decrease in lung functionally weighted mean dose by 0.64 Gy (p< .01),fV20by 0.90% (p= 0.099), andfV5by 5.07% (p< .01) respectively. Though inferior conformity was observed, all dose constraints were well satisfied. The ablation study results indicated that both function-guided beam angle selection and plan optimization significantly contributed to dose redirection.Significance.AP-FLART can effectively redirect doses from HFL to LFL without severely degrading conventional dose metrics, producing high-quality FLART plans. It has the potential to advance the research and clinical application of FLART by providing labor-free, consistent, and high-quality plans.

Novel Solution for Using Neural Networks for Kidney Boundary Extraction in 2D Ultrasound Data.

Background and Objective: Kidney ultrasound (US) imaging is a significant imaging modality for evaluating kidney health and is essential for diagnosis, treatment, surgical intervention planning, and follow-up assessments. Kidney US image segmentation consists of extracting useful objects or regions from the total image, which helps determine tissue organization and improve diagnosis. Thus, obtaining accurate kidney segmentation data is an important first step for precisely diagnosing kidney diseases. However, manual delineation of the kidney in US images is complex and tedious in clinical practice. To overcome these challenges, we developed a novel automatic method for US kidney segmentation. Methods: Our method comprises two cascaded steps for US kidney segmentation. The first step utilizes a coarse segmentation procedure based on a deep fusion learning network to roughly segment each input US kidney image. The second step utilizes a refinement procedure to fine-tune the result of the first step by combining an automatic searching polygon tracking method with a machine learning network. In the machine learning network, a suitable and explainable mathematical formula for kidney contours is denoted by basic parameters. Results: Our method is assessed using 1380 trans-abdominal US kidney images obtained from 115 patients. Based on comprehensive comparisons of different noise levels, our method achieves accurate and robust results for kidney segmentation. We use ablation experiments to assess the significance of each component of the method. Compared with state-of-the-art methods, the evaluation metrics of our method are significantly higher. The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of our method is 94.6 ± 3.4%, which is higher than those of recent deep learning and hybrid algorithms (89.4 ± 7.1% and 93.7 ± 3.8%, respectively). Conclusions: We develop a coarse-to-refined architecture for the accurate segmentation of US kidney images. It is important to precisely extract kidney contour features because segmentation errors can cause under-dosing of the target or over-dosing of neighboring normal tissues during US-guided brachytherapy. Hence, our method can be used to increase the rigor of kidney US segmentation.

H-ProSeg: Hybrid ultrasound prostate segmentation based on explainability-guided mathematical model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Accurate and robust prostate segmentation in transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images is of great interest for image-guided prostate interventions and prostate cancer diagnosis. However, it remains a challenging task for various reasons, including a missing or ambiguous boundary between the prostate and surrounding tissues, the presence of shadow artifacts, intra-prostate intensity heterogeneity, and anatomical variations. METHODS: Here, we present a hybrid method for prostate segmentation (H-ProSeg) in TRUS images, using a small number of radiologist-defined seed points as the prior points. This method consists of three subnetworks. The first subnetwork uses an improved principal curve-based model to obtain data sequences consisting of seed points and their corresponding projection index. The second subnetwork uses an improved differential evolution-based artificial neural network for training to decrease the model error. The third subnetwork uses the parameters of the artificial neural network to explain the smooth mathematical description of the prostate contour. The performance of the H-ProSeg method was assessed in 55 brachytherapy patients using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Jaccard similarity coefficient (Ω), and accuracy (ACC) values. RESULTS: The H-ProSeg method achieved excellent segmentation accuracy, with DSC, Ω, and ACC values of 95.8%, 94.3%, and 95.4%, respectively. Meanwhile, the DSC, Ω, and ACC values of the proposed method were as high as 93.3%, 91.9%, and 93%, respectively, due to the influence of Gaussian noise (standard deviation of Gaussian function, σ = 50). Although the σ increased from 10 to 50, the DSC, Ω, and ACC values fluctuated by a maximum of approximately 2.5%, demonstrating the excellent robustness of our method. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we present a hybrid method for accurate and robust prostate ultrasound image segmentation. The H-ProSeg method achieved superior performance compared with current state-of-the-art techniques. The knowledge of precise boundaries of the prostate is crucial for the conservation of risk structures. The proposed models have the potential to improve prostate cancer diagnosis and therapeutic outcomes.

Outlier identification in radiation therapy knowledge-based planning: A study of pelvic cases.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to apply statistical metrics to identify outliers and to investigate the impact of outliers on knowledge-based planning in radiation therapy of pelvic cases. We also aimed to develop a systematic workflow for identifying and analyzing geometric and dosimetric outliers. METHODS: Four groups (G1-G4) of pelvic plans were sampled in this study. These include the following three groups of clinical IMRT cases: G1 (37 prostate cases), G2 (37 prostate plus lymph node cases) and G3 (37 prostate bed cases). Cases in G4 were planned in accordance with dynamic-arc radiation therapy procedure and include 10 prostate cases in addition to those from G1. The workflow was separated into two parts: 1. identifying geometric outliers, assessing outlier impact, and outlier cleaning; 2. identifying dosimetric outliers, assessing outlier impact, and outlier cleaning. G2 and G3 were used to analyze the effects of geometric outliers (first experiment outlined below) while G1 and G4 were used to analyze the effects of dosimetric outliers (second experiment outlined below). A baseline model was trained by regarding all G2 cases as inliers. G3 cases were then individually added to the baseline model as geometric outliers. The impact on the model was assessed by comparing leverages of inliers (G2) and outliers (G3). A receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the optimal threshold. The experiment was repeated by training the baseline model with all G3 cases as inliers and perturbing the model with G2 cases as outliers. A separate baseline model was trained with 32 G1 cases. Each G4 case (dosimetric outlier) was subsequently added to perturb the model. Predictions of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were made using these perturbed models for the remaining 5 G1 cases. A Weighted Sum of Absolute Residuals (WSAR) was used to evaluate the impact of the dosimetric outliers. RESULTS: The leverage of inliers and outliers was significantly different. The Area-Under-Curve (AUC) for differentiating G2 (outliers) from G3 (inliers) was 0.98 (threshold: 0.27) for the bladder and 0.81 (threshold: 0.11) for the rectum. For differentiating G3 (outlier) from G2 (inlier), the AUC (threshold) was 0.86 (0.11) for the bladder and 0.71 (0.11) for the rectum. Significant increase in WSAR was observed in the model with 3 dosimetric outliers for the bladder (P < 0.005 with Bonferroni correction), and in the model with only 1 dosimetric outlier for the rectum (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We established a systematic workflow for identifying and analyzing geometric and dosimetric outliers, and investigated statistical metrics for outlier detection. Results validated the necessity for outlier detection and clean-up to enhance model quality in clinical practice.

Adaptive radiation therapy: technical components and clinical applications.

In current standard radiation therapy process, patient anatomy is represented by the snapshot of computed tomographic images at the simulation for treatment planning. However, patient anatomy during the treatment course is not static, and the changes can be in the order of centimeters. The goal of the adaptive radiation therapy (ART) is to measure and account these variations in the treatment process, so that the optimal planned dose distribution is the same as the final delivered dose distribution. The field of the ART is rapidly evolving. The implementation of the ART principle is built on technical components in 3 main areas: image guidance, dose verification, and plan adaptation. The purpose of this review was to present different ART methods currently developed and used by different investigators.