Comparing Energy-Based Devices for Striae Improvement: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Striae distensae (SD) are cutaneous lesions that are caused by hormones or mechanical stress leading to rapid expansion of skin. Therefore, SD are now a cosmetic concern. However, improving SD is notoriously difficult. Among different treatments, energy-based devices (EBDs) are much more effective and controllable. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this review was to determine the most effective type of EBD for improving the appearance of striae. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The population comprised patients suffering from striae. Different types of EBDs used to improve striae were compared. The primary outcome of the reduction in the width of striae was evaluated. A random-effects model was performed. The means and standard deviations were extracted. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that after a comparison among the 4 types of EBDs, no significant differences were observed in the reduction of striae width. CONCLUSION: Radiofrequency, ablative lasers, nonablative lasers, and intense pulsed light are all effective treatments for reducing the striae width. None of them was superior to the others. However, radiofrequency and ablative lasers may have the highest chance of improving the appearance of striae.

Comparing the efficacy of different steroids for rhinoplasty: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Rhinoplasty can cause tissue trauma and inflammatory responses. Edema and ecchymosis, especially on the face, accompanied by inflammation are common complications. The anti-inflammatory properties of steroids can reduce postoperative edema and ecchymosis. OBJECTIVE: This review aims to determine the most effective type of steroids for preventing complications related to rhinoplasty. METHODS: The study was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The population of comprised patients who underwent rhinoplasty or septorhinoplasty. Different types of steroids administrated intravenously during the perioperative period were compared. The primary outcome of postoperative edema and other outcomes were evaluated on postoperative day 1, 3, and 7. Random-effects model was performed. The means and standard deviations were extracted. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized controlled trials were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that dexamethasone and methylprednisolone significantly reduced edema on postoperative day 1 compared with placebo. No significant differences between the effects of any of two types of steroids were noted. CONCLUSION: At least one dose of intravenous steroid intervention is recommended during the perioperative period of rhinoplasty. However, in terms of reducing edema and ecchymosis, no significant differences were noted among dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, and betamethasone.

Patient Comfort with Various Local Infiltration Anesthetics for Minor Oculoplastic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although local anesthetics have been extensively studied, limited evidence is available regarding the optimal solution for maximizing patient comfort in minor oculoplastic procedures. OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal anesthetic solution for local infiltration in minor oculoplastic surgeries to maximize patient comfort. METHODS: This systematic review with network meta-analysis of prospective studies was conducted to understand the efficacy of different local anesthetics in combination to maximize patient comfort. The study was designed according to the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The population comprised patients receiving local infiltration anesthesia in minor oculoplastic surgeries. Various anesthetics with adjuvants were compared with respect to injection pain, operative bleeding, and complications. Random-effects model was performed. The primary outcome of injection pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) or a preference question (which intervention was the least painful). Other outcomes were operative bleeding and complications, which were evaluated with a similar preference question. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of 521 patients (917 eyes) were included. The network meta-analysis revealed that "bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine with epinephrine" led to a significant decrease in injection pain (preference question) compared to "prilocaine with felypressin" and "lidocaine with epinephrine," whereas no significant differences were detected in the analysis of injection pain measured using the VAS. CONCLUSIONS: "Bicarbonate-buffered lidocaine with epinephrine" may be the optimal anesthetic solution for local infiltration in minor oculoplastic surgeries due to reduced injection pain, operative bleeding, and postoperative swelling. However, this should be interpreted cautiously as the confidence in the evidence was very low. THE CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021260332 (PROSPERO).

Optimal timing and effect of music therapy in patients with burn injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Burn injuries may have both physiological and psychological consequences. Numerous studies have reported the use of music therapy during burn injury treatment, but the optimal timing for music therapy remains unclear. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on patients with burn injuries to analyze the effects of music intervention on them at different timings: background (T0) and time before (T1), during (T2), and after (T3) change dressing (CD). METHOD: The PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for articles published before Novenber 2020 based on predetermined criteria. Our search focused on two keywords: music and burn. Reviewers extracted data from all eligible studies independently. The I2 statistic was used to determine statistical heterogeneity. The endpoints included standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Relevant Forest plots were also created. RESULT: This study finally included seven trials recruiting a total of 524 patients. The results indicated that compared with non-music intervention, music intervention significantly reduced anxiety at T0 (SMD = -1.32, 95% CI [-2.61, -0.02], T1 (SMD = -2.15, 95% CI [-4.30, -0.00]) and T2 (SMD = -0.39, 95% CI [-0.74, -0.04]). Moreover, they also significantly reduced the pain levels at T0 (SMD = -1.59, 95% CI [-2.00, -1.17]) and T2 (SMD = -0.47, 95% CI [-0.82, -0.12]), improved the mental condition, and reduced the amount of opioid analgesics used at T0. CONCLUSION: Music therapy seems to have some effects at T0 and T1 in patients with burn injuries. Music therapy was more effective in improving psychological outcomes than physiological outcomes. However, additional high-quality studies related to music therapy for patients with burn injuries are warranted.