Bendamustine treatment of haematological malignancies: significant risks of opportunistic viral, fungal and bacterial infections.

OBJECTIVES: Bendamustine is a standard treatment for low-grade B-cell lymphomas, and considered safe in clinical trials. Its safety in routine practice might be different. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the infection complications in an unselected cohort of patients treated with bendamustine over a nine-year period. Patients were regularly monitored for blood counts and cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation by antigen assay and polymerase chain reaction. They received granulocyte colony stimulating factor for neutropenia, and routine anti-pneumocystis and optional anti-fungal prophylaxis. RESULTS: There were 179 men and 127 women at a median age of 61.5 (20-90) years, 52% receiving bendamustine for relapsed/refractory disease. Malignancies included low-grade B-cell lymphomas (54%), myeloma (10%), T-cell lymphomas (11%), Hodgkin lymphoma (2%) and other lymphoid neoplasms (23%). Most patients had good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score: 0-1, 72%). CMV reactivation occurred in 58 patients (19%) at a median age of 68 (39-85) years. Univariate analysis showed CMV reactivation to be significantly associated with elevated lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.045), decreased albumin (P = 0.003) and older age (reactivation versus no reactivation: 66.3 ± 11.4 versus 59.4 ± 14.5 years, P = 0.0016). Age remained the only significant risk on multivariate analysis. CMV reactivation resulted in retinitis (N = 4), ependymitis/ventriculitis (N = 1) and duodenitis/colitis (N = 1). Invasive fungal disease occurred in five patients (candidemia, N = 2; aspergillosis N = 1; cryptococcemia, N = 1; scedosporiosis, N-1). Nineteen patients had culture positive septicaemia. CONCLUSION: Our observations showed that even with a vigorous anti-infective strategy, bendamustine treatment was still associated with significant risks of bacterial and opportunistic viral and fungal infections.

A parametric study of the acute effects of antipsychotic drugs on glucose sensitivity in an animal model.

The therapeutic use of atypical antipsychotics is associated with a high incidence of metabolic side-effects. In the present study we examined the acute effects of both high and low-dose atypical antipsychotic drugs and one typical drug on alterations in glucose and insulin parameters using a rodent model. The effects of administration of clozapine (2mg/kg; 20mg/kg), olanzapine (1.5mg/kg; 15 mg/kg), risperidone (0.5mg/kg; 2.5mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.1mg/kg; 1.0mg/kg) on glucose sensitivity and insulin resistance were determined through HOMA-IR values in fasted rats and glucose clearance during a glucose tolerance test. Acute effects were determined 60, 180 or 360 min following drug administration. The atypical antipsychotics produced significant dose and time dependent effects on fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations, HOMA-IR values, insulin resistance and glucose intolerance. The greatest effect on glucose dysregulation was noted primarily with clozapine and olanzapine; however, all four treatments caused significant increases in fasting glucose and/or insulin levels with the high dose, 60 min post-drug administration. Together, these findings indicate that acute administration of antipsychotic drugs has potent effects on metabolic regulation of glucose and insulin sensitivities, which may contribute to metabolic side-effects seen in humans.

Persistent antipsychotic polypharmacy and excessive dosing in the community psychiatric treatment setting: a review of medication profiles in 435 Canadian outpatients.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed (1) to determine the proportion of patients treated with persistent antipsychotic polypharmacy in an outpatient population and (2) to determine if persistent antipsychotic polypharmacy is associated with excessive dosing. METHOD: Using a province-wide network that links all pharmacies in British Columbia, Canada, to a central set of data systems, we identified community mental health outpatients who had been treated with the same pharmacologic regimen for at least 90 days. Apart from antipsychotics, data collection included anticholinergics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, benzodiazepines, lipid-lowering agents, and antidiabetic agents. Demographic data including sex, age, and diagnosis were obtained from the patient's chart. In order to compare dosages of the various antipsychotics we used a fixed unit of measurement based on dividing the prescribed daily dose (PDD) by the defined daily dose (DDD). A PDD/DDD ratio greater than 1.5 was defined as excessive dosing. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-five patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Overall, the prevalence of persistent antipsychotic polypharmacy was 25.7% for the entire cohort. The prevalence of persistent antipsychotic polypharmacy was highest for patients with schizoaffective disorder (33.7%), followed by schizophrenia (31.7%), psychosis not otherwise specified (20.0%), bipolar disorder (16.9%), and major depression (14.3%). The mean +/- SD PDD/DDD ratio for all patients prescribed persistent antipsychotic polypharmacy was not only excessive, it was significantly greater compared to that of patients receiving antipsychotic monotherapy (1.94 +/- 0.12 vs 0.94 +/- 0.04, P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: Using a diagnostically heterogeneous outpatient population, this study is, we believe, the first to report that persistent antipsychotic polypharmacy is associated with excessive dosing, in and of itself as well as compared to antipsychotic monotherapy.