Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Lab ; 69(11)2023 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37948477

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the role of histogram analysis of DCE-MRI parameters for accurately distinguishing renal clear cell carcinoma from renal hamartoma with minimal fat. METHODS: Patients with renal tumors were enrolled from January 2013 to December 2015, including renal clear cell carcinoma (n = 39) and renal hamartoma (n = 10). Preoperative DCE-MR Imaging was performed, and whole-tumor regions of interest were drawn to obtain the corresponding histogram parameters, including skewness, kurtosis, frequency size, energy, quartile, etc. Histogram parameters differences between renal clear cell car-cinoma and renal hamartoma with minimal fat were compared. The diagnostic value of each significant parameter in predicting malignant tumors was determined. RESULTS: Histogram parameters of the DCE map contributed to differentiating the benign from malignant renal tumor groups. Histogram analysis of DCE maps could effectively present the heterogeneity of renal tumors and aid in differentiating benign and malignant tumors. ROC analysis results indicated that when frequency size = 1,732 was set as the threshold value, favorable diagnostic performance in predicting malignant tumors was achieved (AUC - 0.964; sensitivity - 84.6%; specificity - 100%), followed by skewness, Energy, Entropy, Uniformity, quartile 5, quartile 50, and kurtosis. CONCLUSIONS: Histogram analysis of DCE-MRI shows promise for differentiating benign and malignant renal tumors. Frequency size was the most significant parameter for predicting renal clear cell carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Renal Cell , Hamartoma , Kidney Neoplasms , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Kidney Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/diagnostic imaging , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Bone Miner Res ; 27(10): 2208-16, 2012 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22623101

ABSTRACT

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used to assess bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition, but measurements vary among instruments from different manufacturers. We sought to develop cross-calibration equations for whole-body bone density and composition derived using GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic DXA systems. This multinational study recruited 199 adult and pediatric participants from a site in the US (n = 40, ages 6 through 16 years) and one in China (n = 159, ages 5 through 81 years). The mean age of the participants was 44.2 years. Each participant was scanned on both GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic Discovery or Delphi DXA systems on the same day (US) or within 1 week (China) and all scans were centrally analyzed by a single technologist using GE Healthcare Lunar Encore version 14.0 and Hologic Apex version 3.0. Paired t-tests were used to test the results differences between the systems. Multiple regression and Deming regressions were used to derive the cross-conversion equations between the GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic whole-body scans. Bone and soft tissue measures were highly correlated between the GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic and systems, with r ranging from 0.96 percent fat [PFAT] to 0.98 (BMC). Significant differences were found between the two systems, with average absolute differences for PFAT, BMC, and BMD of 1.4%, 176.8 g and 0.013 g/cm(2) , respectively. After cross-calibration, no significant differences remained between GE Healthcare Lunar measured results and the results converted from Hologic. The equations we derived reduce differences between BMD and body composition as determined by GE Healthcare Lunar and Hologic systems and will facilitate combining study results in clinical or epidemiological studies.


Subject(s)
Absorptiometry, Photon/methods , Absorptiometry, Photon/standards , Body Composition/physiology , Bone Density/physiology , Bone and Bones/diagnostic imaging , Bone and Bones/physiology , Internationality , Adiposity/physiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Body Weight/physiology , Calibration , Child , Child, Preschool , Demography , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reference Standards , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...