Evaluation of leap motion control for hand rehabilitation in burn patients: An experience in the dust explosion disaster in Formosa Fun Coast.

Hand burns cause functional impairment. Leap motion control (LMC), a kind of virtual reality games, employs a novel system that provides biofeedback and training of fine motor function and functional skills. In this study, we hypothesized that LMC would improve burned hand function. Sixteen participants were allocated to either the LMC group or the control group. The LMC group played 20min identical leap motion video games after 40min traditional occupational therapy (OT). The control group received traditional OT for 60min. Both groups received interventions 2 days a week for 4 months. A series of questionnaires were administered, including BSHS-B, QuickDASH, iADL, and Barthel index. Data on baseline characteristics including joint range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength, and scar thickness were obtained. Furthermore, we used the Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for comparison, as appropriate. We found improvements in BSHS-B, QuickDASH, and iADL in the LMC group (all p<0.05) compared to those in the control group. In the LMC-trained hand, the ROM of the thumb IP joint and pinch strength increased, whereas the scar thickness over the first dorsal interossei muscle decreased (p<0.05). In conclusion, leap motion training could help patients with hand burns to increase finger ROM, decrease scar thickness, and improve hand function.

Extracorporeal Shock Waves Versus Botulinum Toxin Type A in the Treatment of Poststroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is noninferior to botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) for the treatment of poststroke upper limb spasticity. DESIGN: Randomized noninferiority trial. SETTING: Referral medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=42) with chronic stroke (28 men; mean age, 61.0±10.6y). INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either ESWT or BoNT-A. During the study period, all patients continued their regular rehabilitation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessments were performed at baseline and at 1, 4, and 8 weeks after the intervention. The primary outcome was the change from baseline of the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) score of the wrist flexors at week 4. Secondary outcomes included the change of the MAS scores, Tardieu angles of the wrist and elbow flexors, wrist and elbow passive range of motion (PROM), and upper extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UE-FMA) score during the study period, as well as the treatment response rate. RESULTS: The primary outcome result in the ESWT group (-0.80±0.41) was similar to that in the BoNT-A group (-0.90±0.44), with a higher confidence limit (0.4) for the difference between groups within the prespecified margin of 0.5, indicating the noninferiority of ESWT to BoNT-A. The response rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in secondary outcomes relative to baseline; however, the ESWT group yielded greater improvement in wrist and elbow PROM and UE-FMA score. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that ESWT is a noninferior treatment alternative to BoNT-A for poststroke upper limb spasticity. ESWT and BoNT-A caused similar reduction in spasticity of the wrist and elbow flexors; however, ESWT yielded greater improvement in wrist and elbow PROM and UE-FMA score.

Comparison of the effect of focused and radial extracorporeal shock waves on spastic equinus in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that either focused or radial shock wave therapy is an effect method for the treatment of spasticity in patients with stroke. However, no previous study compared these two types of extracorporeal shock wave on spasticity in patients with stroke. This study aimed to compare the effect of focused and radial shock wave therapy for the treatment of spastic equinus in patients with stroke. DESIGN: Randomized control trial. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation center in a medical center. POPULATION: Thirty-two stroke patients with spastic equinus (18 males and 14 women; mean age, 60.1±10.6 years). METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive three sessions of either focused or radial shock wave therapy at 1-week intervals. The intensities that were used during focused shock wave therapy (0.12 mJ/mm2) and radial shock wave therapy (2.4 bar) were comparable. The patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 4, and 8 weeks after the final shockwave treatment. The primary outcome measure was change of modified Ashworth Scale Score of gastrocnemius muscle. The secondary outcome measures were Tardieu Scale, ankle passive range of motion, dynamic foot contact area and gait speed. A linear mixed model with repeated measures was used to compare each outcome measure between the two groups. RESULTS: Both groups improved significantly in terms of modified Ashworth Scale Score and Tardieu Scale, and no differences were found between the two groups. In terms of ankle passive range of motion and plantar contact area during gait, the radial shock wave therapy yielded a significantly greater improvement than the focused shock wave therapy. No significant changes were observed in gait speed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggested that focused and radial shock wave therapy resulted in similar significant improvements in the modified Ashworth scale score and Tardieu scale, but those in the radial shock wave therapy group experienced greater improvements in the ankle passive range of motion and plantar contact area during gait. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: Both focused and radial shock wave therapy yielded similar improve the spasticity of gastrocnemius muscle. Radial shock wave therapy is superior to focused shock wave therapy in terms of improving the ankle passive range of motion and plantar contact area during gait in patients with stroke.

Bidirectional association between obstructive sleep apnea and depression: A population-based longitudinal study.

An association may exist between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and depression. However, results regarding this association are inconsistent, and the direction of the association between OSA and depression remains unknown. Therefore, we used the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database to investigate the bidirectional association between OSA and depression.A total of 6427 OSA patients and 32,135 age and sex-matched control subjects were enrolled to analyze the risk of depression among patients with OSA, where 27,073 patients with depression and 135,365 control subjects were enrolled to address the risk of OSA among patients with depression. All subjects were followed to identify their outcomes of interest from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2012.Cox proportional-hazards models, after adjusting for potential confounders, demonstrated that patients with OSA had an increased risk (adjusted hazard ratio 2.48, 95% confidence interval 2.20-2.79) of developing depression, whereas those with depression were associated with an increased risk of future OSA (adjusted hazard ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 2.11-2.50).Our results suggested that a strong bidirectional relationship exists between OSA and depression, with each disease influencing the development of the other. Health providers are recommended to ensure the early detection and management of depression among patients with OSA and vice versa.