ABSTRACT
Purpose: The present study is aimed at exploring whether rs3213172, rs3213173, and rs3213176 polymorphisms of the E2F1 gene confer risk for ovarian cancer. Methods: A total of 80 patients with ovarian cancer were selected from the first affiliated hospital of Soochow University in Jiangsu Province from January 2016 to June 2021, including 48 cases that were premenopausal and 32 cases that were menopausal. 130 healthy women who participated in normal physical examinations during the same period were selected as the control group. The rs3213172, rs3213173, and rs3213176 polymorphisms of the E2F1 gene were detected by the fluorescent probe method. Results: For rs3213173 and rs3213176 loci, there were no statistical significances in genotype distribution frequency between the ovarian cancer group and the control group (P > 0.05). For rs3213172 loci, a significant difference was observed in CT genotype between the ovarian cancer group and the control group (P=0.024). Conclusion: E2F1 gene rs3213173 and rs3213176 polymorphisms confer no risk to ovarian cancer risk. The CT genotype of E2F1 gene rs3213172 polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, and E2F1 gene rs3213172 polymorphism may be a novel marker for the risk prediction of ovarian cancer.
Subject(s)
E2F1 Transcription Factor , Ovarian Neoplasms , Case-Control Studies , China/epidemiology , E2F1 Transcription Factor/genetics , Female , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Humans , Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology , Ovarian Neoplasms/genetics , Polymorphism, Single NucleotideABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Brucellosis is a quite normal zoonotic infection, which is caused by immediate contact with animals infected with Brucella or its products. IL-10 (- 1082 G/A, - 819 C/T, - 592C/A) and IL-6 -174 G/C polymorphisms have a great relationship with IL-10 and IL-6 production, which brings about Brucellosis pathogenesis and development. So far, the results of published literatures were controversial. Now, we perform a meta-analysis in different ethnic populations to get a more precise estimate of above polymorphisms with Brucellosis susceptibility. METHODS: Both OR and corresponding 95%CI were enrolled to make an assessment of the association strength through extracting genotyping frequency of cases and controls. The χ2-test based Q-statistic and I2 statistics were applied. If there was no evident heterogeneity, the fixed-effects model would be applied. If not, the random-effects model would be used. RESULTS: The significant associations were only found in Asian population of - 819 loci under three genetic models as follows: (Allele model: OR = 0.60, 95%CI = 0.44-0.82, P = 0.001), (homozygote comparison: OR = 0.24, 95%CI = 0.09-0.62, P = 0.003), (recessive genetic model: OR = 0.22, 95%CI = 0.05-0.91, P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, IL-10 - 819 loci polymorphism contributes no risk to Caucasian population but may be associated with decreased risk in Asian population. And IL-10 -1082 G/A, 592 loci and IL-6 -174 G/C polymorphism are not associated with Brucellosis risk.