Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Surg Endosc ; 35(7): 3488-3491, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32661710

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication after transhiatal esophagectomy (THE), but there is limited data regarding the initial management and subsequent outcomes after stricture dilation. There is concern that dilating to larger diameters upon the initial encounter, specifically with high-grade strictures, will lead to increased risk for complications. We therefore reviewed one surgeon's experience with esophageal dilations after THE and provided data and treatment recommendations based upon these findings. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent esophageal dilations ≥ 18 mm up to 20 mm after THE between 2006 and 2019 at our institution was performed. Patient demographics were n = 97, age = 70, 81 males. RESULTS: For all cases, the mean location, length, diameter of the stricture, and number of days from surgery and initial dilation were 20 cm, 1.9 cm, 6.7 mm, and 106 days, respectively. Most dilations (79%) occurred within 2 weeks to 3 months from surgery. 29.9% were dilated up to 18 mm, 10.3% were dilated up to 19 mm, and 59.8% were dilated up to 20 mm upon initial dilation. Even 1-mm-diameter lesions could be safely dilated upon 18-20 mm. In this study group there were no complications after endoscopic dilation that required hospitalization or further surgical or endoscopic interventions. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that early aggressive endoscopic management of esophageal anastomotic strictures after THE can be safely performed.


Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Stenosis , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Constriction, Pathologic , Dilatation , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Esophageal Stenosis/surgery , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Can J Surg ; 58(3): 150-2, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26011848

ABSTRACT

Currently, general surgeons provide about 50% of endoscopy services across Canada and an even greater proportion outside large urban centres. It is essential that endoscopy remain a core component of general surgery practice and a core competency of general surgery residency training. The Canadian Association of General Surgeons Residents Committee supports the position that quality endoscopy training for all Canadian general surgery residents is in the best interest of the Canadian public. However, the means by which quality endoscopy training is achieved has not been defined at a national level. Endoscopy training in Canadian general surgery residency programs requires standardization across the country and improved measurement to ensure that competency and basic credentialing requirements are met.


Subject(s)
Endoscopy/education , General Surgery/education , Internship and Residency/standards , Canada , Clinical Competence , Endoscopy/standards , General Surgery/standards , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...