Progesterone increases susceptibility of gilts to uterine infections after intrauterine inoculation with infectious bacteria.

In cattle and sheep, a progestogenated uterus is susceptible to infections, but this is not well documented for pigs. Therefore, the effects of day of the estrous cycle and progesterone on the susceptibility to uterine infections were evaluated. Gilts (n = 5 per group) were assigned to treatments in 2 x 2 factorial arrays. In Exp. 1, day of cycle and bacterial challenge were main effects. On d 0 or 8, uteri were inoculated with either 70 x 10(7) cfu of Escherichia coli and 150 x 10(7) cfu of Arcanobacterium pyogenes in PBS or with PBS. In Exp. 2, ovariectomy (OVEX) and progesterone treatment were main effects. On d 0, gilts were ovariectomized or a sham procedure was performed. After surgery, gilts received i.m. injections of progesterone (10 mg/5 mL) or 5 mL of safflower oil diluent twice daily. On d 8, gilts were inoculated with the same doses of bacteria as in Exp. 1. In Exp. 1 and 2, vena caval blood was collected for 4 d, after which uteri were collected. Sediment and ability to culture E. coli and A. pyogenes from uterine flushings were used to diagnose infections. Differential white blood cell counts and lymphocyte response to concanavalin A (Con A) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) were used to measure lymphocyte proliferation. Progesterone, estradiol-17beta, prostaglandin F2alpha, (PGF2alpha), and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) were measured in vena caval blood. In Exp. 1, d-8 gilts receiving bacteria developed infections, but d-0 gilts receiving bacteria did not. Daily percentages of neutrophils and lymphocytes changed (P < 0.05) with cycle day and bacterial challenge. Basal- and Con A-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation were greater (P < 0.05) for d-0 than for d-8 gilts. Concentrations of PGF2, (P < 0.01) and PGE2 (P < 0.05) increased after bacterial challenge, regardless of stage of the estrous cycle at the time of inoculation. In Exp. 2, OVEX decreased (P < 0.001) and progesterone treatment increased (P < 0.001) progesterone concentrations, and OVEX decreased (P < 0.01) estradiol-17beta. Gilts with ovarian and/or exogenous progesterone developed infections. Daily percentages of neutrophils and lymphocytes changed in response to OVEX, and neutrophils changed (P < 0.05) in response to endogenous and exogenous progesterone. Lymphocyte proliferation in response to Con A and LPS increased (P < 0.05) with OVEX and decreased (P < 0.05) with progesterone treatment. We conclude that endogenous and exogenous progesterone reduce the ability of the uterus in gilts to resist infections.

Reproductive performance of ewe lambs from ewes from different selection practices with or without induced estrus.

Three groups of ewe lambs born in May (experiment 1; n=211) or April (experiment 2; n=174) were used to evaluate the effects of selection line and induction of estrus on pregnancy rate. Experiment 1 was a single factor experiment with induction of estrus as the main effect. In early December, May-born Targhee (n=82) and Rambouillet x Targhee (n=129) ewes were randomly assigned within body weight to one of two treatment groups: control or induction of estrus. Experiment 2 was designed in a 2x2 factorial array with the main effects of induction of estrus or selection line. In early November, April-born Targhee lambs (n=174) from two distinct selection lines were either treated as controls or received an estrus induction treatment. The two lines included an unselected control line of randomly bred ewes and a line that had been selected since 1976, based on the weight of lamb weaned. Ewes from each line were randomly assigned within body weight to one of the treatment groups. In experiments 1 and 2, estrus was induced using MAP pessaries. Pessaries were inserted for 12 days. At the time of pessary removal, ewe lambs received 400 IU eCG i.m. All ewe lambs were bred in multi-sire pens. Pregnancy rate and fetal numbers were determined either by lambing data or real-time ultrasound. Body weight, lambing date and fetal numbers were analyzed by GLM, and remaining variables were analyzed by CATMOD. For experiment 1, estrus induction increased (P<0.01) pregnancy rates (61 versus 31%) and number of fetuses estimated by real-time ultrasound (79 versus 35%) compared to control ewe lambs. Pregnancy rate and fetal number were increased (P<0.01) for the 1st year compared to the 2nd year. For experiment 2, estrus induction tended to increase (P<0.07) pregnancy rate, and pregnancy rate differed (P<0.01) between selection lines. Estrus induction increased (P<0.05) fetal numbers (0.96) compared to controls (0.77). Fetal numbers were greater (P<0.01) for the selected line (1.06) compared to random bred controls (0.67). Average date of lambing was earlier in both experiments for the estrus-induced ewe lambs compared to controls. These results indicate that induction of estrus can be recommended if increased reproduction is desired for ewe lambs.

Oxytocin-induced cervical dilation and cervical manipulation in sheep: effects on laparoscopic artificial insemination.

The difficulty of cervical penetration severely limits the use of transcervical AI (TAI) in sheep, and trauma from cervical manipulation (CM) may reduce fertility after TAI. We investigated the effects of cervical dilation using exogenous oxytocin (OT) to facilitate TAI and its effects on reproductive variables after laparoscopic AI (LAI). Estrus was synchronized by inserting pessaries impregnated with 6alpha-methyl-17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone acetate (60 mg) for 12 d. In Exp. 1, we determined whether OT and CM before LAI affected the interval from pessary removal to ovulation and fertilization rate. Crossbred ewes (n = 16) were assigned to 1) saline-CM or 2) OT-CM. In Exp. 2, effects of OT and CM on lambing rates were evaluated with white-faced ewes (n = 220) in a 2 x 2 factorial experiment: 1) saline-sham CM; 2) saline-CM; 3) OT-sham CM; and 4) OT-CM. In both studies, eCG (400 IU i.m.) was injected at pessary removal, and LAI was performed 48 to 52 h later. In Exp. 1, ewes received i.v. either 400 USP units of OT or 20 mL of saline at 30 to 60 min before LAI, and CM was administered as for TAI. Beginning 32 h after pessary removal and continuing at 8-h intervals, ovaries were examined with ultrasonography to estimate time of ovulation. Treatment in Exp. 1 did not affect combined ovum/embryo recovery rate (69%), but OT-CM decreased fertilization rate (47 vs 59%; P < 0.05). The OT tended to reduce the interval to ovulation (OT, 59 h vs saline, 66 h; P < 0.06). The OT x CM interaction in Exp. 1 was not significant. For Exp. 2, approximately 25 min before sham CM or CM, 200 USP units of OT or 10 mL of saline was injected i.v. The LAI was performed immediately after sham CM or CM. At 10 to 12 d after AI in Exp. 2, ewes were mated with Suffolk rams. Blood was collected between 24 and 26 d after AI for pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB) RIA. The PSPB pregnancy and lambing rates were both 62% in saline-sham controls. The CM did not affect pregnancy (69%) or lambing rate (64%). The OT treatment decreased (P < 0.05) PSPB pregnancy (59%) and lambing rates (56%) in OT-sham ewes and pregnancy and lambing rates in CM ewes (both 43%). Neither CM nor OT before LAI affected lambing rates to next estrus, indicating no long-term damage to the cervix or uterus. In summary, CM did not affect fertility after LAI, but OT decreased lambing rate independent of CM. If OT will not be usable for TAI, it may still be a tool for training TAI personnel.

Technical note: Artificial vagina vs a vaginal collection vial for collecting semen from rams.

The time required to train rams to an artificial vagina (AV) makes collecting semen from large numbers of rams difficult. To manage this problem, we developed a glass, round-bottomed, 1.9-cm i.d. x 9.8-cm long vaginal collection vial (VCV). Three experiments were conducted to determine whether the VCV affected 1) semen volume per collection, 2) percentage of motile spermatozoa, 3) forward progressive motility score before and after extension and after freezing and thawing, and 4) our ability to collect semen from untrained rams. A soft rubber cap with a hole in the center was used to cover the VCV. A VCV was inserted into the vagina of an estrual ewe, and a monofilament line attached to the VCV was clipped to the wool near the vulva. Rams were joined with unrestrained ewes in a pen until they ejaculated into the VCV. In Exp. 1, five rams trained to an AV were used in a switchback design with four collection periods. During each period (1 d), semen was collected with an AV and a VCV. Immediately after collection, semen volume and sperm motility were quantified. Semen was extended with an aloe vera gel-based diluent at a 1:4 dilution rate, motility was quantified again, and semen was frozen. At 1 h after freezing, semen was thawed and sperm motility was quantified. Ejaculate volume (mean = 0.7 mL) and all measures of motility after collection were similar (P > 0.05) for the two collection methods. In Exp. 2, 10 rams trained to an AV were used in a switchback design with five collection periods (period = 3 d). On d 1 and 3 of each period, an AV and a VCV were used to collect semen. Collection method did not affect (P > 0.05) ejaculate volume (mean = 1.0 mL), percentage of motile cells, or forward progressive motility score. In Exp. 3, 51 untrained rams were used in a switchback design with a single collection period (2 d). Semen was collected with an AV and a VCV. Ability to collect an ejaculate and time required for collection were recorded. The likelihood of collecting semen from untrained rams was greater (P < 0.01) using a VCV (mean = 31.4%) than using an AV (mean = 9.8%). Collection method did not affect (P > 0.05) ejaculate volume (mean = 0.8 mL), percentage of motile cells, or forward progressive motility score. We concluded that a VCV could be used to collect semen from rams that are not trained for semen collection without decreasing ejaculate volume or sperm motility.

Technical note: development of a transcervical oocyte recovery procedure for sheep.

An oocyte recovery procedure was developed and evaluated to determine whether a transcervical embryo recovery procedure is feasible with our method, which includes estradiol-17beta (E2) and oxytocin (OT) treatments, for dilating the cervix in ewes. On d 6 of an estrous cycle, oocytes were recovered either transcervically or with a laparotomy procedure. In the laparotomy group, ovulation rate was determined during the procedure and was used to calculate the percentage ofoocytes recovered. The laparotomy procedure was a standard uterine flush, and 12 mL of PBS was used to flush each uterine horn. In the transcervical group, the ovaries in each ewe were evaluated ultrasonically to determine ovulation rate. For transcervical recovery, 100 microg of E2 were injected i.v. on d 5 to increase cervical OT receptors, and 100 USP units of OT were injected i.v. 10 to 12 h later to dilate the cervix. Approximately 25 min after OT, ewes were placed in dorsal recumbency in a Commodore cradle, and a modified Foley catheter was passed through the cervix and into the uterus for injection (80 to 210 mL) and aspiration of PBS. The PBS was aspirated with a vacuum pump. The percentage of PBS recovered was greater (P<.01) at laparotomy than with the transcervical procedure (85.8 vs. 36.2%). Despite that difference, oocyte recovery did not differ significantly between the two groups (67% for laparotomy vs. 50% for transcervical; [oocytes recovered/number of corpora lutea] x 100), and there was no evidence that the transcervical procedure damaged the oocytes; the zona pellucida remained intact around all of the oocytes. In conclusion, a procedure that includes E2-OT-induced cervical dilation, passage of a modified Foley catheter into the uterus, and incremental infusion and aspiration of media through the catheter can be used to recover oocytes transcervically from ewes. This procedure may make transcervical embryo recovery feasible for sheep.

Estradiol-17 beta-oxytocin-induced cervical dilation in sheep: application to transcervical embryo transfer.

Experiments were conducted to determine whether exogenous estradiol-17beta (E2) and oxytocin (OT) can be used to improve transcervical (TC) embryo transfer (ET) procedures for sheep. Our concerns that the E2-OT treatment may alter luteal function prompted Exp. 1, in which 32 ewes were assigned to treatments in a 2x2 factorial array. On d 7 after onset of estrus, ewes received i.v. either 100 microg of E2 or diluent; 12 h later, ewes received i.v. either 400 USP units of OT or saline. To monitor luteal function, progesterone was measured in jugular blood collected from d 7 to 18. The treatments did not affect progesterone concentrations. Two trials were conducted in Exp. 2. In Trial 1, ewes were assigned to one of three treatments: TC transfer with E2-OT treatment to dilate the cervix, laparoscopic ET with E2-OT treatment, or laparoscopic ET with an equivalent diluent that did not dilate the cervix. In Trial 2, ewes were assigned to treatments in a 2x2 factorial array: TC or laparoscopic ET on d 6; E2-OT treatment for cervical dilation or diluents on d 6. Transferred embryos were recovered on d 12 in Trial 1 and d 14 in Trial 2, evaluated morphologically for development, and scored. Treatments did not affect the percentage of transferred embryos recovered. However, mode of transfer decreased (P<.01) the mean embryo development score. The E2-OT treatment increased (P<.01) the development score of embryos transferred transcervically, indicating that cervical dilation may improve the chances of embryos surviving after TC transfer. In conclusion, E2-OT treatment did not affect luteal function, and the E2-OT treatment can be used to enhance the success of TC embryo transfer in sheep.