Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Soc Sci Med ; 52(6): 863-70, 2001 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11234861

ABSTRACT

The direct costs and health effects of a primary-care-based brief intervention for hazardous alcohol consumption were examined. The total cost of the intervention was calculated from costs associated with: marketing the intervention programme; providing training and support in the use of the intervention materials; physician time required for providing brief advice for 'at-risk' drinkers. The effect of the intervention on health outcomes was expressed in terms of number of life years saved by preventing alcohol-related deaths. This was derived by combining estimates of the impact of the programme if it were implemented nationally with available evidence on the health effects of excess alcohol consumption. Results are based on international trial evidence showing the physical resources required by the intervention and its effectiveness combined with Australian price data. The costs associated with screening and brief advice using the current intervention programme range from Aus$19.14 to Aus$21.50. The marginal costs per additional life year saved were below Aus$1873. The robustness of the model used is supported by an extensive sensitivity analysis. In comparison with existing health promotion strategies the costs and effects of the current intervention are highly encouraging.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/prevention & control , Health Promotion/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Value of Life , Alcohol Drinking/economics , Alcohol Drinking/mortality , Australia/epidemiology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling/economics , Female , Health Education/economics , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/economics , Public Health Administration
2.
Soc Sci Med ; 47(2): 203-11, 1998 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9720639

ABSTRACT

The cost-effectiveness of strategies to market and train primary care physicians in brief intervention for hazardous alcohol consumption was examined. Physicians were randomly assigned to one of three marketing strategies designed to promote the "uptake" of a brief intervention package for hazardous and harmful alcohol consumption. The strategies were direct mail, tele-marketing, or academic detailing. One hundred and twenty-seven of those physicians who requested the package during the marketing phase (phase 1) and who also agreed to participate in the training and support phase of the project (phase 2) were matched into one of three training and support conditions: training and no support, training and minimal support, training and maximal support. An additional 34 physicians were randomly selected and assigned to a control condition. The ultimate aim of training and support was to maximise physician screening and counselling rates. Tele-marketing was found to be more cost-effective than academic detailing and direct mail in promoting the uptake of the package. For the training and support phase costs and effects increased with the level of support, hence the issue to be considered is whether the additional cost incurred in moving from one strategy to another is warranted given the increase in the level of outcome.


Subject(s)
Alcohol Drinking/prevention & control , Alcoholism/prevention & control , Education, Medical, Continuing/organization & administration , Marketing of Health Services/organization & administration , Physicians, Family/education , Psychotherapy, Brief/education , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Counseling , Humans , Mass Screening , New South Wales , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Program Evaluation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...