Association of preoperative anaesthesia consultation prior to elective noncardiac surgery with patient and health system outcomes: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical volumes and use of preoperative anaesthesia consultations are increasing. However, contemporary data estimating the association between preoperative anaesthesia consultation and patient (days alive and at home [DAH30], mortality) and system (costs, length of stay, and readmissions) outcomes are not available. METHODS: We conducted a population-based comparative effectiveness study using linked health administrative data among patients aged ≥40 yr who underwent intermediate-risk to high-risk elective, inpatient, noncardiac surgery in Ontario, Canada (2009-17). Our primary outcome was DAH30. Secondary outcomes included DAH90, 30-day and 1-yr mortality, 30-day health system costs, length of index admission, and 30-day readmissions. Propensity score overlap weights were used to adjust for confounders. Prespecified effect modifier analyses focused on high-risk subgroups. RESULTS: Among 364 149 patients, 274 365 (75.3%) received a preoperative anaesthesia consultation. No adjusted association was found (22.5 days vs 22.5 days; adjusted ratio of means 1.00, 95% CI 1.00-1.00) between consultation and DAH30 in the full population. We identified significant effect modification (significantly more DAH30) among patients with ischaemic heart disease, ASA physical status ≥4, frailty index score ≥0.21, and who underwent vascular surgery. Secondary outcomes were associated with preoperative consultation, including greater DAH90, decreased length of stay, lower 30-day and 1-yr mortality, and reduced 30-day costs. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative anaesthesia consultation was not associated with greater DAH30 across the overall study population. However, important potential benefits were observed among high-risk subgroups. Research is needed to identify optimal patient populations and consultation processes.

Designing and Implementing a Competency-Based Training Program for Anesthesiology Residents at the University of Ottawa.

Competency-based medical education is gaining traction as a solution to address the challenges associated with the current time-based models of physician training. Competency-based medical education is an outcomes-based approach that involves identifying the abilities required of physicians and then designing the curriculum to support the achievement and assessment of these competencies. This paradigm defies the assumption that competence is achieved based on time spent on rotations and instead requires residents to demonstrate competence. The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) has launched Competence by Design (CBD), a competency-based approach for residency training and specialty practice. The first residents to be trained within this model will be those in medical oncology and otolaryngology-head and neck surgery in July, 2016. However, with approval from the RCPSC, the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Ottawa, launched an innovative competency-based residency training program July 1, 2015. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the program and offer a blueprint for other programs planning similar curricular reform. The program is structured according to the RCPSC CBD stages and addresses all CanMEDS roles. While our program retains some aspects of the traditional design, we have made many transformational changes.

The clock drawing test is a poor screening tool for postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction after aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: The Clock Drawing Test (CDT) is a screening tool for dementia that tests a variety of cognitive domains. The CDT takes a maximum of two minutes to complete and might be helpful in identifying postoperative cognitive disorders at the bedside. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the CDT in a population at high risk for postoperative cognitive disorders METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, patients were recruited who were ≥ 60 yr of age and scheduled for elective open repair of the abdominal aorta. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) on postoperative days (POD) 2 and 4 and at discharge. Cognitive function was assessed with neuropsychometric tests before surgery and at discharge. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) was determined using the Reliable Change Index. Clock Drawing Tests were administered at all time points. Agreement between the CDT and test for delirium or POCD was assessed with Cohen's Kappa statistic. RESULTS: Delirium was noted in 30 of 83 patients (36%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 26 to 46%) during their hospital stay, while POCD was noted in 48 of 78 patients (60%; 95% CI 51 to 72%) at discharge. Agreement between the CDT and CAM was poor at three intervals (Kappa 0.06 to 0.29), as was POCD at discharge (Kappa 0.46). Sensitivity of the CDT was <0.71 for both delirium and POCD at all intervals. False positives and negatives were common. CONCLUSION: Agreement between CDT and tests for delirium and POCD was poor; sensitivity was inadequate for a screening test. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00911677).

A prospective cohort study evaluating associations among delirium, postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and apolipoprotein E genotype following open aortic repair.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing major vascular surgery are at high risk of postoperative delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is involved in central acetylcholine synthesis, and patients bearing the ε4 genotype (APOE-ε4) are at increased risk of both vascular dementia and peripheral vascular disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the associations among delirium, POCD, and APOE-ε4 in patients undergoing open aortic repair. METHODS: Following Research Ethics Board approval and written informed consent, we recruited a cohort of patients ≥ 60 yr of age undergoing open aortic repair. Apolipoprotein E genotyping and a battery of nine neuropsychometric (NP) tests were performed prior to surgery. Delirium was assessed on postoperative days two, four, and discharge using the Confusion Assessment Method. Neuropsychometric testing was repeated at discharge and again three months following surgery. A group of non-surgical patients was used to adjust NP scores using reliable change index methodology. Logistic regression was used to evaluate independent predictors of both delirium and POCD. RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients underwent surgery, 78 completed NP testing on discharge, and sixty-nine completed NP testing at three months. Delirium was noted in 36% of patients after surgery, while POCD was noted in 62% at discharge and 6% at three months. Delirium predicted POCD at discharge (odds ratio 2.86; 95% confidence intervals 0.99 to 8.27) but not at three months. Apolipoprotein E-ε4 genotype was not associated with either delirium or POCD following adjustment for covariates. CONCLUSION: Both delirium and POCD are common following open aortic repair; however, the APOE genotype did not predict either condition. This trial has been registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00911677).

Evidence-based clinical update: general anesthesia and the risk of delirium and postoperative cognitive dysfunction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this structured, evidence-based, clinical update was to identify the best evidence comparing general and regional anesthesia and their influence on delirium or cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in the postoperative period. SOURCE: In June 2005 a structured search of MEDLINE from 1966 to present using OVID software was undertaken. Medical subject headings and textwords describing both delirium and POCD were employed. OVID's Therapy (sensitivity) algorithm was used to maximize the detection of randomized trials. The bibliographies of eligible publications were hand-searched to identify trials not identified in the electronic search. Publications enrolling children were excluded. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations were scored using Centre for Evidence Based Medicine criteria. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 18 unique randomized controlled trials were identified: two evaluating delirium; ten evaluating POCD; and six evaluating both. Outcomes for delirium were abstracted from eight trials that enrolled 765 patients (387 regional anesthesia; 378 general anesthesia). Outcomes for POCD were identified from 16 trials that enrolled 2,708 patients (1,313 regional anesthesia; 1,395 general anesthesia). Both delirium (11-43%) and POCD (15-25%) were relatively common in trials actively seeking these outcomes. Consistent Level 2b evidence suggests no significant increase in delirium in patients receiving general anesthesia compared with those receiving regional anesthesia. Similarly, consistent Level 1 evidence indicates that exposure to general anesthesia is not significantly associated with POCD. CONCLUSION: Available randomized controlled trials suggest that there is no significant difference in the incidence of delirium or POCD when general anesthesia and regional anesthesia are compared.

Preoperative testing is inconsistent with published guidelines and rarely changes management.

PURPOSE: The Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society (CAS), the Ontario Preoperative Task Force (OPTF) and The Ottawa Hospital (TOH) have published guidelines detailing the indications for preoperative testing. The purpose of this study was to: (a) document compliance of testing practice at TOH-Civic Campus with published guidelines; and (b) determine the impact of preoperative testing on clinical management. METHODS: Following Research Ethics approval all patients undergoing elective surgery at TOH-Civic Campus in the first three months of 2004 were identified. One hundred charts from each month were randomly selected and analyzed retrospectively by a single reviewer. The ordering and results of four preoperative tests were characterized. The indication for preoperative testing was identified from preoperative notes and the source of non-compliant orders was identified. Compliance with the CAS, OPTF, and TOH guidelines was documented. Abnormal test results were analyzed for evidence of a subsequent change in clinical management. RESULTS: The charts of 294 of the 2,116 patients who underwent elective surgery at TOH-Civic Campus in the first three months of 2004 were reviewed. A total of 534 tests were ordered on 198 patients (67%). Non-compliance rates varied significantly (5-98%) depending on test and guideline analyzed. Results of 329 tests (61.6%) were normal. Management was changed by 14 of 534 tests ordered (2.6%). Surgery proceeded as scheduled in all cases. CONCLUSION: The majority of elective surgical patients undergo preoperative testing. Non-compliance with guidelines ranged from 5 to 98%. The results of most tests were normal and influenced management in only 2.6% of cases.