Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
J Patient Exp ; 8: 23743735211060812, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34869848

ABSTRACT

Limerence is an underresearched condition of unknown prevalence that causes significant loss of productivity and emotional distress to sufferers. Individuals with limerence display an obsessive attachment to a particular person or "limerent object" (LO) that interferes with daily functioning and the formation and maintenance of healthy relationships. The current study proposes a conceptualization of the condition in a 28-year-old individual and describes a treatment approach using cognitive-behavioral techniques, most notably exposure responsive prevention as used in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. The number and type of compulsive rituals performed by the treated individual were notably decreased at 9-month follow-up after treatment, and a subjective assessment of dysfunctional thought patterns related to the LO also suggested improvement. A novel screening instrument is presented, as validated screening instruments do not yet exist. Implications for diagnosis and treatment are discussed.

2.
J Patient Saf ; 16(3S Suppl 1): S36-S41, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32809999

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify potential patient safety practices to reduce high-risk opioid prescribing. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify opioid stewardship (OS) strategies implemented in primary care and other settings. Included studies evaluated an OS strategy or a multicomponent OS initiative to address potential harms of opioids and used experimental or quasi-experimental designs. RESULTS: We identified 14 studies and 1 systematic review that met inclusion criteria. Most studies examined multicomponent OS interventions, which often consisted of guideline-recommended clinical interventions or care processes (e.g., use urine drug screening, check Prescription Drug Monitoring Program), as well as implementation strategies (e.g., dashboards, audit and feedback). Most studies examined the effect of OS interventions on reducing the potential risks of opioids with judicious prescribing and guideline-concordant care (e.g., reduce inappropriate high opioid dosages, avoid co-prescribing opioids and benzodiazepines, use urine drug screening, treatment agreements). CONCLUSIONS: The strength of the evidence is low to moderate that OS efforts decrease numbers of opioid prescriptions, proportion of patients on long-term opioids, or days' supply. The strength of the evidence for OS initiatives producing significant reductions in opioid dosages was moderate. Future research is needed on the effectiveness of OS interventions, particularly studies with experimental designs and in diverse settings within the health care system.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Patient Safety/standards , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/pharmacology , Female , Humans , Male , Treatment Outcome
3.
J Infect ; 81(1): 48-56, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32325131

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Findings during the 2009 pandemic suggest severe maternal infection with pandemic influenza had adverse perinatal health consequences. Limited data exist evaluating the perinatal health effects of severe seasonal influenza and non-influenza infections during pregnancy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of pregnant women from Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States was established using birth records to identify pregnancies and birth outcomes and hospital and laboratory testing records to identify influenza and non-influenza associated acute respiratory or febrile illness (ARFI) hospitalizations. ARFI hospitalized women were matched to non-hospitalized women (1:4) by country and season of conception. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate the relative risk (aRR) of preterm birth (PTB), small-for-gestational-age (SGA), and low birthweight (LBW) birth, adjusting for pre-existing medical conditions, maternal age, and parity. RESULTS: 950 pregnant women hospitalized with an ARFI were matched with 3,800 non-hospitalized pregnant women. Compared to non-hospitalized women, risk of PTB was greater among women hospitalized with influenza-associated ARFI (aRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.15-2.15) and non-influenza ARFI (aRR: 2.78; 95% CI: 2.12-3.65). Similar results were observed for LBW; there were no associations with SGA birth. CONCLUSIONS: ARFI hospitalization during pregnancy was associated with increased risk of PTB and LBW.


Subject(s)
Premature Birth , Australia/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Israel/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome/epidemiology , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies
4.
J Patient Exp ; 7(6): 820-823, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33457500
5.
J Infect Dis ; 221(10): 1703-1712, 2020 04 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31875916

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pregnant women are at increased risk of seasonal influenza hospitalizations, but data about the epidemiology of severe influenza among pregnant women remain largely limited to pandemics. METHODS: To describe the epidemiology of hospitalizations for acute respiratory infection or febrile illness (ARFI) and influenza-associated ARFI among pregnant women, administrative and electronic health record data were analyzed from retrospective cohorts of pregnant women hospitalized with ARFI who had testing for influenza viruses by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States during 2010-2016. RESULTS: Of 18 048 ARFI-coded hospitalizations, 1064 (6%) included RT-PCR testing for influenza viruses, 614 (58%) of which were influenza positive. Of 614 influenza-positive ARFI hospitalizations, 35% were in women with low socioeconomic status, 20% with underlying conditions, and 67% in their third trimesters. The median length of influenza-positive hospitalizations was 2 days (interquartile range, 1-4), 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 15%-21%) resulted in delivery, 10% (95% CI, 8%-12%) included a pneumonia diagnosis, 5% (95% CI, 3%-6%) required intensive care, 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%) included a sepsis diagnosis, and <1% (95% CI, 0%-1%) resulted in respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings characterize seasonal influenza hospitalizations among pregnant women and can inform assessments of the public health and economic impact of seasonal influenza on pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Fever/therapy , Hospitalization , Influenza, Human/therapy , Respiratory Tract Diseases/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Global Health , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Seasons , Time Factors , Young Adult
6.
JMIR Res Protoc ; 8(1): e11333, 2019 Jan 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30664495

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although pregnant women are believed to have elevated risks of severe influenza infection and are targeted for influenza vaccination, no study to date has examined influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations during pregnancy, primarily because this outcome poses many methodological challenges. OBJECTIVE: The Pregnancy Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (PREVENT) was formed in 2016 as an international collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Abt Associates; and study sites in Australia, Canada, Israel, and the United States. The primary goal of this collaboration is to estimate IVE in preventing acute respiratory or febrile illness (ARFI) hospitalizations associated with laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection during pregnancy. Secondary aims include (1) describing the incidence, clinical course, and severity of influenza-associated ARFI hospitalization during pregnancy; (2) comparing the characteristics of ARFI-hospitalized pregnant women who were tested for influenza with those who were not tested; (3) describing influenza vaccination coverage in pregnant women; and (4) comparing birth outcomes among women with laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalization versus other noninfluenza ARFI hospitalizations. METHODS: For an initial assessment of IVE, sites identified a retrospective cohort of pregnant women aged from 18 to 50 years whose pregnancies overlapped with local influenza seasons from 2010 to 2016. Pregnancies were defined as those that ended in a live birth or stillbirth of at least 20 weeks gestation. The analytic sample for the primary IVE analysis was restricted to pregnant women who were hospitalized for ARFI during site-specific influenza seasons and clinically tested for influenza virus infection using real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: We identified approximately 2 million women whose pregnancies overlapped with influenza seasons; 550,344 had at least one hospitalization during this time. After restricting to women who were hospitalized for ARFI and tested for influenza, the IVE analytic sample included 1005 women. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to addressing the primary question about the effectiveness of influenza vaccination, PREVENT data will address other important knowledge gaps including understanding the incidence, clinical course, and severity of influenza-related hospitalizations during pregnancy. The data infrastructure and international partnerships created for these analyses may be useful and informative for future influenza studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/11333.

7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(9): 1444-1453, 2019 04 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30307490

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To date, no study has examined influenza vaccine effectiveness (IVE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations during pregnancy. METHODS: The Pregnancy Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network (PREVENT) consisted of public health or healthcare systems with integrated laboratory, medical, and vaccination records in Australia, Canada (Alberta and Ontario), Israel, and the United States (California, Oregon, and Washington). Sites identified pregnant women aged 18 through 50 years whose pregnancies overlapped with local influenza seasons from 2010 through 2016. Administrative data were used to identify hospitalizations with acute respiratory or febrile illness (ARFI) and clinician-ordered real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) testing for influenza viruses. Overall IVE was estimated using the test-negative design and adjusting for site, season, season timing, and high-risk medical conditions. RESULTS: Among 19450 hospitalizations with an ARFI discharge diagnosis (across 25 site-specific study seasons), only 1030 (6%) of the pregnant women were tested for influenza viruses by rRT-PCR. Approximately half of these women had pneumonia or influenza discharge diagnoses (54%). Influenza A or B virus infections were detected in 598/1030 (58%) of the ARFI hospitalizations with influenza testing. Across sites and seasons, 13% of rRT-PCR-confirmed influenza-positive pregnant women were vaccinated compared with 22% of influenza-negative pregnant women; the adjusted overall IVE was 40% (95% confidence interval = 12%-59%) against influenza-associated hospitalization during pregnancy. CONCLUSION: Between 2010 and 2016, influenza vaccines offered moderate protection against laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations during pregnancy, which may further inform the benefits of maternal influenza vaccination programs.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Influenza Vaccines/administration & dosage , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccine Potency , Adolescent , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza B virus/genetics , Influenza B virus/isolation & purification , Influenza B virus/pathogenicity , Influenza, Human/diagnosis , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/immunology , Middle Aged , Pregnancy , RNA, Viral/genetics , Research Design , Retrospective Studies , Seasons , United States/epidemiology
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 67(12): 1915-1918, 2018 11 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29800089

ABSTRACT

Few studies have addressed respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection during pregnancy. Among 846 pregnant women hospitalized with respiratory illness and tested for RSV, 21 (2%) were RSV positive, of whom 8 (38%) were diagnosed with pneumonia. Despite study limitations, these data can help inform decisions about RSV prevention strategies.


Subject(s)
Developed Countries , Hospitalization , Pregnancy Complications/virology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Adult , Australia/epidemiology , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Income , Israel/epidemiology , Pneumonia/virology , Pregnancy , Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Human/isolation & purification , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...