Vedolizumab Immunogenicity With Long-Term or Interrupted Treatment of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

Patients in the GEMINI 1 or 2 study (NCT00790933; Eudra CT2008-002784-14) with ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease had low immunogenicity rates after vedolizumab treatment for up to 52 weeks. We report immunogenicity rates from the GEMINI long-term safety (LTS) study using a new drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescence assay, including analyses in patients who received continuous vedolizumab induction and maintenance in GEMINI 1 or 2 and long term safety, or vedolizumab induction and placebo maintenance in GEMINI 1 or 2 followed by re-treatment in long term safety (treatment interruption). Patients were enrolled in GEMINI long term safety from GEMINI 1, 2, or 3, or as de novo vedolizumab-treated patients; all received vedolizumab 300 mg intravenously every 4 weeks. Vedolizumab antidrug antibody (ADA) status was determined by electrochemiluminescence assay; ADA-positive samples were characterized by neutralizing activity. Vedolizumab ADA data were available for 1753 patients: 1513 continuously treated with vedolizumab before/during GEMINI long term safety, 240 re-treated after treatment interruption. Among continuously treated patients, 36 (2.4%) were ADA positive (15 persistently, 20 neutralizing ADA positive). Among re-treated patients, 53 (22.1%) were ADA positive (42 persistently, 40 neutralizing ADA positive). Longitudinal immunogenicity rates increased during placebo maintenance (19.4% at week 52), then decreased in GEMINI long term safety to rates (0 at the final visit) similar to continuously treated patients. ADA positivity was 1.1% vs 2.5% (continuous treatment) and 23.1% vs 22.0% (re-treatment) among patients with and without infusion-related reactions, respectively. Long-term vedolizumab treatment was associated with generally low immunogenicity rates; vedolizumab-re-treated patients had higher rates during placebo maintenance, which decreased during re-treatment. No relationship was observed between immunogenicity and infusion-related reactions.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer clinical and biomarkers data sharing resource document: Volume II-practical challenges.

The development of strongly predictive validated biomarkers is essential for the field of immuno-oncology (IO) to advance. The highly complex, multifactorial data sets required to develop these biomarkers necessitate effective, responsible data-sharing efforts in order to maximize the scientific knowledge and utility gained from their collection. While the sharing of clinical- and safety-related trial data has already been streamlined to a large extent, the sharing of biomarker-aimed clinical trial derived data and data sets has been met with a number of hurdles that have impaired the progression of biomarkers from hypothesis to clinical use. These hurdles include technical challenges associated with the infrastructure, technology, workforce, and sustainability required for clinical biomarker data sharing. To provide guidance and assist in the navigation of these challenges, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Biomarkers Committee convened to outline the challenges that researchers currently face, both at the conceptual level (Volume I) and at the technical level (Volume II). The committee also suggests possible solutions to these problems in the form of professional standards and harmonized requirements for data sharing, assisting in continued progress toward effective, clinically relevant biomarkers in the IO setting.

Comparison of the ELISA and ECL Assay for Vedolizumab Anti-drug Antibodies: Assessing the Impact on Pharmacokinetics and Safety Outcomes of the Phase 3 GEMINI Trials.

Vedolizumab immunogenicity has been assessed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with a ~ 0.5 µg/mL drug interference, which may underestimate on-drug immunogenicity. We aimed to compare immunogenicity results between ELISA and the new drug-tolerant electrochemiluminescence (ECL) assay (and the two versions of neutralizing assays, drug-sensitive versus drug-tolerant). The ECL assay drug tolerance is ~ 100 times higher than that of the ELISA (≥ 50 µg/mL vs. 0.5 µg/mL with a 500 ng/mL positive control), and assay sensitivity is < 5 ng/mL for both assays. Vedolizumab immunogenicity was assessed in 2000 GEMINI 1 and 2 patients originally tested by ELISA and retested by ECL assay. Anti-drug antibody (ADA) impact on infusion-related reactions and pharmacokinetics (PK) was examined using descriptive statistics and population PK analyses. By ECL assay, 6% (86/1427) of patients treated with vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy tested ADA-positive. Of these, 20 patients were persistently positive and 56 had neutralizing antibodies. By ELISA, 4% (56/1434) of these patients were ADA-positive, 9 were persistently positive, and 33 had neutralizing antibodies. Among 61 patients with infusion-related reactions, 6 (10%) were ADA-positive (2 persistently positive) by ECL assay. By ELISA, 3 (5%) patients were both ADA-positive and persistently positive. Most results (96%) were similar with both assays. In the updated population PK model, ADA-positive status was estimated to increase vedolizumab linear clearance by a factor of 1.10 (95% credible interval 1.03-1.17), which is consistent with previous reports. The impact of ADA on safety and PK modeling remained generally consistent using either ELISA or ECL assay. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00783718 and NCT00783692.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer clinical and biomarkers data sharing resource document: Volume I-conceptual challenges.

The sharing of clinical trial data and biomarker data sets among the scientific community, whether the data originates from pharmaceutical companies or academic institutions, is of critical importance to enable the development of new and improved cancer immunotherapy modalities. Through data sharing, a better understanding of current therapies in terms of their efficacy, safety and biomarker data profiles can be achieved. However, the sharing of these data sets involves a number of stakeholder groups including patients, researchers, private industry, scientific journals and professional societies. Each of these stakeholder groups has differing interests in the use and sharing of clinical trial and biomarker data, and the conflicts caused by these differing interests represent significant obstacles to effective, widespread sharing of data. Thus, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) Biomarkers Committee convened to identify the current barriers to biomarker data sharing in immuno-oncology (IO) and to help in establishing professional standards for the responsible sharing of clinical trial data. The conclusions of the committee are described in two position papers: Volume I-conceptual challenges and Volume II-practical challenges, the first of which is presented in this manuscript. Additionally, the committee suggests actions by key stakeholders in the field (including organizations and professional societies) as the best path forward, encouraging the cultural shift needed to ensure responsible data sharing in the IO research setting.

Consistent expression of guanylyl cyclase-C in primary and metastatic gastrointestinal cancers.

BACKGROUND: The transmembrane receptor guanylate cyclase-C (GCC) has been found to be expressed in colorectal cancers. However, limited data are available on GCC protein expression in non-colorectal gastrointestinal tumors and few studies have reported whether GCC protein expression was consistently preserved in synchronous primary and metastatic cancer tissues. METHODS: GCC protein status was assessed by immunohistochemistry in tumor specimens from individuals (n = 627) with gastrointestinal tumors, including esophageal (n = 130), gastric (n = 276), pancreatic (n = 136), and colorectal (n = 85) primary and metastatic tumors. Tissue specimens consisted of tissue microarrays containing esophageal, gastric, pancreatic tumors, and whole-slide tissue sections from colorectal cancer patients with matching primary and metastatic tumors. RESULT: Among the evaluated esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic tumors, the frequency of GCC positivity at the protein level ranged from 59% to 68%. GCC was consistently expressed in primary and matched/synchronous metastatic lesions of colorectal cancer tissues derived from the same patients. CONCLUSION: This observational study demonstrated the protein expression of GCC across various gastrointestinal malignancies. In all cancer histotypes, GCC protein localization was observed predominantly in the cytoplasm compared to the membrane region of tumor cells. Consistent immunohistochemistry detection of GCC protein expression in primary colorectal cancers and in their matched liver metastases suggests that the expression of GCC is maintained throughout the process of tumor progression and formation of metastatic disease.

Vedolizumab Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety, and Tolerability Following Administration of a Single, Ascending, Intravenous Dose to Healthy Volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Vedolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the α4ß7 integrin, is indicated for treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, single ascending-dose study, the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and tolerability of vedolizumab were evaluated in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Forty-nine participants (in five cohorts) were randomly assigned in a 4:1 ratio to receive a single intravenous infusion of either vedolizumab (0.2, 0.5, 2.0, 6.0, or 10.0 mg/kg) or placebo. Blood samples were collected for measurement of vedolizumab serum concentrations and α4ß7 saturation on peripheral blood lymphocytes by vedolizumab. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed using a non-compartmental approach. Adverse events were monitored. RESULTS: Vedolizumab maximum observed serum concentration (C max) demonstrated dose proportionality over the dose range tested. Greater than dose-proportional increases in area under the serum concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-inf) and shorter terminal elimination half-life (t 1/2) were observed from 0.2 to 2.0 mg/kg, suggestive of nonlinear pharmacokinetics at lower doses. At doses higher than 2.0 mg/kg, these parameters increased dose proportionally. Saturation of α4ß7 was at or near maximal levels (>90 %) at all doses and time points when vedolizumab was measurable in serum. A total of 21 of 39 (54 %) vedolizumab-treated participants were anti-drug antibody (ADA) positive, and 11 (28 %) were persistently ADA positive. Overall, no adverse event signals, including serious infections or malignancies, were apparent. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab exhibited target-mediated disposition, characterized by a rapid, saturable, nonlinear elimination process at low concentrations and a slower linear elimination process at higher concentrations. Nearly complete α4ß7 saturation was observed at all doses. A single intravenous infusion of vedolizumab was well tolerated by healthy volunteers.

Understanding the Supersensitive Anti-Drug Antibody Assay: Unexpected High Anti-Drug Antibody Incidence and Its Clinical Relevance.

Numbers of biotherapeutic products in development have increased over past decade. Despite providing significant benefits to patients with unmet needs, almost all protein-based biotherapeutics could induce unwanted immunogenicity, which result in a loss of efficacy and/or increase the risk of adverse reactions, such as infusion reactions, anaphylaxis, and even life-threatening response to endogenous proteins. Recognizing these possibilities, regulatory agencies request that immunogenicity be assessed as part of the approval process for biotherapeutics. Great efforts have been made to reduce drug immunogenicity through protein engineering. Accordingly the immunogenicity incidence has been reduced from around 80% in murine derived products to 0-10% in fully human products. However, recent improvements in immunogenicity assays have led to unexpectedly high immunogenicity rates, even in fully human products, leading to new challenges in assessing immunogenicity and its clinical relevance. These new immunogenicity assays are becoming supersensitive and able to detect more of anti-drug antibodies (ADA) than with earlier assays. This paper intends to review and discuss our understanding of the supersensitive ADA assay and the unexpected high ADA incidence and its potential clinical relevance.

Recommendations for the development and validation of flow cytometry-based receptor occupancy assays.

Receptor occupancy measurements demonstrate the binding of a biotherapeutic agent to its extra-cellular target and represent an integral component of the pharmacodynamic (PD) portfolio utilized to advance the development and commercialization of a therapeutic agent. Coupled with traditional pharmacokinetic (PK) assessments derived from serum drug concentration, receptor occupancy data can be used to model PK/PD relationships and validate dose selection decisions throughout the drug development lifecycle. Receptor occupancy assays can be even more challenging to develop than other flow cytometric methods (e.g. surface immunophenotyping). In addition to typical considerations regarding stability of the cell type of interest, stability of the target-bound therapeutic agent and stability of the target receptor must be taken into account. Reagent selection is also challenging as reagents need to be evaluated for the potential to compete with the therapeutic agent and bind with comparable affinity. This article provides technical guidance for the development and validation of cytometry-based receptor occupancy assays.

Role of receptor occupancy assays by flow cytometry in drug development.

The measurement of the binding of a biotherapeutic to its cellular target, receptor occupancy (RO), is increasingly important in development of biologically-based therapeutic agents. Receptor occupancy (RO) assays by flow cytometry describe the qualitative and/or quantitative assessment of the binding of a therapeutic agent to its cell surface target. Such RO assays can be as simple as measuring the number of cell surface receptors bound by an antireceptor therapeutic agent or can be designed to address more complicated scenarios such as internalization or shedding events once a receptor engages the administered therapeutic agent. Data generated from RO assays can also be used to model whether given doses of an experimental therapeutic agent and their administration schedules lead to predicted levels of receptor occupancy and whether the receptor is modulated (up or down) on cells engaged by the therapeutic agent. There are a variety of approaches that can be used when undertaking RO assays and with the ability to measure distinct subsets in heterogeneous populations, flow cytometry is ideally suited to RO measurements. This article highlights the importance of RO assays on the flow cytometric platform in the development of biotherapeutic agents.

Recommendations for adaptation and validation of commercial kits for biomarker quantification in drug development.

Increasingly, commercial immunoassay kits are used to support drug discovery and development. Longitudinally consistent kit performance is crucial, but the degree to which kits and reagents are characterized by manufacturers is not standardized, nor are the approaches by users to adapt them and evaluate their performance through validation prior to use. These factors can negatively impact data quality. This paper offers a systematic approach to assessment, method adaptation and validation of commercial immunoassay kits for quantification of biomarkers in drug development, expanding upon previous publications and guidance. These recommendations aim to standardize and harmonize user practices, contributing to reliable biomarker data from commercial immunoassays, thus, enabling properly informed decisions during drug development.

In vitro assessment of the effects of vedolizumab binding on peripheral blood lymphocytes.

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a humanized monoclonal antibody in development for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. VDZ binds to the α4ß7 integrin complex and inhibits its binding to mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1), thus preventing lymphocyte extravasation to gut mucosal tissues. To understand whether VDZ has additional effects that may affect its overall safety as a therapeutic molecule, we examined other potential actions of VDZ. In vitro assays with human peripheral blood lymphocytes demonstrated that VDZ fails to elicit cytotoxicity, lymphocyte activation, and cytokine production from memory T lymphocytes and does not interfere with the suppressive ability of regulatory T cells. Furthermore, we demonstrated that VDZ induces internalization of α4ß7 and that the integrin is rapidly re-expressed and fully functional after VDZ withdrawal. These studies provide insight into the mechanisms underlying the observed safety profile of VDZ in clinical trials.

Validation of a flow cytometry based G(2)M delay cell cycle assay for use in evaluating the pharmacodynamic response to Aurora A inhibition.

Pharmacodynamic assays are important aspects for understanding molecularly targeted anticancer agents to investigate the relationship between drug concentration (pharmacokinetics) and drug "effect" or biological activity. As new drug entities are developed that affect DNA cell cycle, a pharmacodynamic assay which measures cell cycle perturbation would be a valuable clinical trial tool. During recent years, flow cytometry has established itself as a useful method to determine the relative nuclear DNA content and percentage of cycling cells of biological specimens. However to date, the analytical validation of cytometry based assays is limited and there is no suitable guidance for method validation of flow cytometry based cell cycle assays. Here we report the validation of a flow cytometry based cell cycle G(2)/M delay assay for use in evaluating the effect of investigational drug MLN8237, a small molecule inhibitor of a mitotic kinase Aurora A, for clinical trial use. The assay method was validated by examining assay robustness, repeatability, reproducibility, precision, and determining the cutoff for a true drug effect based on biostatistical analysis models. Experimental results show that the intra-assay repeatability was less than 20% with an intra-donor variability of less than 40%. The robustness of the assay was less than 30%. Since this is an ex-vivo stimulation assay, variability parameters were expected to be higher. Based on biostatistical modeling, an absolute change in %G(2)M of 5.2% (95% CI) was needed in order to detect a true drug effect. Overall, the assay demonstrated acceptable variability to warrant further in vivo testing.

Validation of a flow cytometry based chemokine internalization assay for use in evaluating the pharmacodynamic response to a receptor antagonist.

Pharmacodynamic assays are important in clinical trial design to investigate the relationship between drug concentration (pharmacokinetics) and drug "effect' or biological activity. Increasingly flow cytometry is being used to examine the pharmacodynamic effect of new drug entities. However, to date, the analytical validation of cytometry based assays is limited and there is no suitable guidance for method validation of flow cytometry-based pharmacodynamic assays. Here we report the validation of a flow cytometry-based chemokine internalization assay for use in evaluating the effect of a receptor antagonist in clinical trials. The assay method was validated by examining the stability of the reagent, assay robustness, sensitivity, repeatability and reproducibility precision. Experimental results show the assay reagent was stable over 26 weeks. The assay demonstrated a sensitivity to distinguish 0.005 microg/ml of a CCR2 antagonist with a %CV of 13.3%. The intra-assay repeatability was less than 15% with an inter-assay repeatability of less than 20%. In vivo study results demonstrated that the assay was consistent and a reliable measure of antagonist activity.

Modulation of CCR2 in rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: CCR2 is a chemokine receptor expressed by monocytes, macrophages, and a subset of T cells. Its ligand, CCL2 (monocyte chemotactic protein 1), is abundantly present in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Blocking CCR2 prevents CCL2-mediated chemotaxis in vitro and modulates arthritis in animal models of RA. In this study we examined the effects of CCR2 blockade on synovial inflammation in RA. METHODS: The study was designed as a phase IIa clinical trial with a human CCR2 blocking antibody (MLN1202) in patients with active RA. Thirty-two patients received 3 infusions, over a period of 6 weeks, with either placebo (n = 9) or anti-CCR2 monoclonal antibody at 0.5 mg/kg (n = 7), 1.5 mg/kg (n = 7), or 4.0 mg/kg (n = 9). Safety was monitored with laboratory tests, immunotoxicity assessments, and documenting of adverse events, and European League Against Rheumatism and American College of Rheumatology response criteria were used to assess clinical improvement. Synovial tissue was obtained at baseline and after 43 days of treatment, for pharmacodynamic analysis using immunohistochemistry and digital image analysis. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare groups, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess changes within the groups. RESULTS: All patients completed the study. Treatment with CCR2 blocking antibody reduced the levels of free CCR2 on CD14+ monocytes by at least 57% and up to 94% (P < 0.001), demonstrating the biologic activity of the compound. However, there was no reduction in the levels or expression of any of the synovial biomarkers. Accordingly, no clinical improvement was observed. CONCLUSION: Treatment with anti-CCR2 blocking antibody did not result in amelioration of synovial inflammation in active RA. The results do not support the notion that blockade of CCR2 may be sufficient to induce clinical improvement in RA.

Concomitant induction of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses in volunteers immunized with Salmonella enterica serovar typhi strain CVD 908-htrA.

Type 1 cell-mediated immunity might play an important role in protection from typhoid fever. We evaluated whether immunization with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) strain CVD 908-htrA (a Delta aroC Delta aroD Delta htrA mutant), a leading live oral typhoid vaccine candidate, elicits specific CD4(+) and CD8(+) S. Typhi immune responses. Potent CTL responses and IFN-gamma secretion by CD8(+) T cells were detected following immunization with CVD 908-htrA in high (4.5 x 10(8) CFU) and low (5 x 10(7) CFU) dosages. S. Typhi-specific CTL were observed in six of eight vaccinees (four high and two low dose) after immunization. Mean increases in the frequency of IFN-gamma spot-forming cells (SFC) in the presence of S. Typhi-infected targets were 221 +/- 41 SFC/10(6) PBMC and 233 +/- 87 SFC/10(6) PBMC, in the high and low dose groups, respectively. Strong CD4(+) T cell responses were also observed. Increases in the IFN-gamma production to soluble S. Typhi flagella (STF) occurred in 82 and 38% of the volunteers who received the high and low doses, respectively. Robust correlations were observed between volunteers that responded with IFN-gamma SFC to stimulation with S. Typhi-infected cells and IFN-gamma released in response to stimulation with STF Ags (r = 0.822, p < 0.001) and between CTL and IFN-gamma production to STF (r = 0.818, p = 0.013). These data demonstrating the concomitant induction of both CD4- and CD8-mediated CMI are consistent with a significant role for type 1 immunity in controlling typhoid infection and support the continuing evaluation of CVD 908-htrA as a typhoid vaccine candidate.