Long-Term Disability Outcomes for Migrants (and Non-migrants) 12 Years Post-injury: Results from the Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study in New Zealand.

To understand, and identify predictors of, long-term post-injury (i.e. 12 years post-injury) disability outcomes for migrants and non-migrants. This 12-year longitudinal study followed participants with entitlement claim injuries registered with New Zealand's universal no-fault injury insurer between 2007 and 2009. Information was collected about migrant status, other sociodemographic, health and disability characteristics, and injury characteristics. Disability outcome information was collected 12 years later. Of 1543 people interviewed 12 years post-injury, 1497 had disability and migrant status data available; 20% were migrants (n = 301). Migrants reporting inadequate pre-injury household income or those who perceived their injury as a threat to life at the time of injury were more likely to experience disability 12 years post-injury (aRR 2.08; 95% CI 1.09-4.03, aRR 2.93; 95%CI 1.17-6.69, respectively). Hospitalised injured migrants were significantly less likely to have long-term disability (aRR 0.18; 95%CI 0.04-0.55) than those not hospitalised. We found sociodemographic and injury-related characteristics were independently associated with long-term disability among migrants. We highlight that some characteristics, ascertained early in the injury pathway, predict risk of long-term disability. Early post-injury interventions focused on improving disability outcomes for migrants may also have long-term impacts.

Participation in paid and unpaid work one year after injury and the impact of subsequent injuries for Maori: Results from a longitudinal cohort study in New Zealand.

INTRODUCTION: Indigenous populations experience greater injury burdens than non-indigenous groups. This paper investigated, for injured Maori (New Zealand's indigenous population): 1) participation in paid and unpaid work 12 months after injury, 2) whether subsequent injuries are predictive of reduced participation, and 3) if particular characteristics of subsequent injuries predict reduced participation. METHODS: The Subsequent Injury Study utilised data from the earlier Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study, a study of 2856 injured New Zealanders (including 566 Maori; 20%) who had an Accident Compensation Corporation (ACC; New Zealand's no-fault injury insurer) entitlement claim (sentinel injury). Data about subsequent injuries reported to ACC and hospital discharge data for injuries resulting in hospitalisation were also utilised. Multivariable models were used to examine if certain aspects of subsequent injury predicted either of two outcomes - reduced participation in paid, and unpaid work 12 months after a sentinel injury. RESULTS: Eligible participants were identified from the 405 Maori participants interviewed at 12 months. Thirty-two percent sustained at least one ACC subsequent injury, and 16% reported reduced participation in unpaid work. Of the eligible participants working for pay at the time of their sentinel injury, 35% reported reduced participation in paid work. Although the relationship between sustaining a subsequent injury (or not) and reduced participation in paid work was unclear (aRR 1.4, 95%CI 0.9,2.3), particular subsequent injury characteristics were identified as being independently predictive: subsequent injury resulting from an assault (aRR 2.4, 95%CI 1.2,4.9), a subsequent injury involving an entitlement claim (aRR 2.0, 95%CI 1.1,3.4), sustaining more than one subsequent injury (aRR 2.0, 95%CI 1.1,3.6), and only non-work-related subsequent injuries (aRR 1.6, 95%CI 1.0,2.7). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced participation in paid work is prevalent for Maori after an ACC entitlement claim injury. Particular characteristics of subsequent injuries after such an event impacts on participation in paid work 12 months after the sentinel injury, but the picture is less clear for unpaid work. Understanding the changes in paid and unpaid work, and the predictive characteristics of subsequent injuries for injured Maori, is important for future injury prevention strategies and supporting return to work rehabilitation programmes, specifically for Maori.

Understanding longer-term disability outcomes for Maori and non-Maori after hospitalisation for injury: results from a longitudinal cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives are to (1) describe disability outcomes at 24 months after injury and (2) identify factors contributing to disability outcomes at 24 months after injury, for Maori and non-Maori who have been hospitalised for injury. STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective cohort study. METHODS: Prospective Outcomes of Injury Study participants were injured New Zealanders aged 18-64 years and recruited from New Zealand's no-fault injury insurer, the Accident Compensation Corporation's entitlement claims register. Data about a number of pre-injury, injury-related and early post-injury characteristics were collected from interviews held at 3 and 24 months after injury. Disability was measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS). Modified Poisson regression modelling was used to estimate relative risks (RRs) of disability for Maori and non-Maori who were hospitalised for injury. RESULTS: Analyses were restricted to 375 Maori and 1824 non-Maori participants for whom complete data were available. Of these, 105 (28%) Maori and 446 (24%) non-Maori were hospitalised for their injury. Of these hospitalised groups, 26% of Maori and 10% of non-Maori were experiencing disability (WHODAS ≥10) at 24 months after injury. Maori who were hospitalised for injury and who were not working for pay before their injury (RR = 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.4-4.9), who were experiencing disability before their injury (RR = 3.1; 95% CI 1.6-5.8) or who reported trouble accessing healthcare services for their injury (RR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.3-5.2) were independently at increased risk of disability 24 months after injury. Non-Maori who were hospitalised for injury and who had inadequate household income before injury (RR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.4-4.1), less than the secondary school qualifications (RR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.1-3.8), were not working for pay before injury (RR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.5-5.1), were experiencing disability before their injury (RR = 3.0; 95% CI 1.7-5.2), had ≥2 chronic conditions (RR = 3.5; 95% CI 2.0-6.4) or had body mass index ≥30 kg/m2/undisclosed (RR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.3-4.4) were at increased risk of disability 24 months after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Variables predicting disability 24 months after injury for Maori, also predict disability 24 months after injury for non-Maori, with one notable exception-trouble accessing healthcare services. Our findings show that having access to healthcare services for injury plays an important role after injury and must be focussed on to ensure that the burden of poor injury-related outcomes and injury-related inequities are reduced and ultimately eliminated.