Inpatient and outpatient treatment patterns of cancer-associated thrombosis in the United States.

Low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are among the recommended treatment options for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) in the 2019 National Comprehensive Care Network guidelines. Little is known about the current utilization of DOACs in CAT patients, particularly on the inpatient to outpatient therapy transition. This study assessed real-world treatment patterns of CAT in hospital/ED in adult cancer patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with CAT during a hospital visit in IQVIA's Hospital Charge Data Master database between July 1, 2015 and April 30, 2018, and followed their outpatient medical and pharmacy claims to evaluate the initial inpatient/ED and outpatient anticoagulants received within 3 months post-discharge. Results showed that LMWH and unfractionated heparin (UFH) were the most common initial inpatient/ED CAT treatments (35.2% and 27.4%, respectively), followed by DOACs (9.6%); 20.8% of patients received no anticoagulants. Most DOAC patients remained on DOACs from inpatient/ED to outpatient settings (71.4%), while 24.1%, 43.5%, and 0.1% of patients treated with LMWH, warfarin, or UFH respectively, remained on the same therapy after discharge. In addition, DOACs were the most common initial post-discharge outpatient therapy. Outpatient treatment persistence and adherence appeared higher in patients using DOACs or warfarin versus LMWH or UFH. This study shows that DOACs are used as an inpatient/ED treatment option for CAT, and are associated with less post-discharge treatment switching and higher persistence and adherence. Further research generating real-world evidence on the role of DOACs to help inform the complex CAT clinical treatment decisions is warranted.

Determinants of glycaemic control in a practice setting: the role of weight loss and treatment adherence (The DELTA Study).

AIMS: Examine the association between weight loss and adherence with glycaemic goal attainment in patients with inadequately controlled T2DM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients ≥ 18 years with T2DM from a US integrated health system starting a new class of diabetes medication between 11/1/10 and 4/30/11 (index date) with baseline HbA1c ≥ 7.0% were included in this cohort study. Target HbA1c and weight change were defined at 6-months as HbA1c < 7.0% and ≥ 3% loss in body weight. Patient-reported medication adherence was assessed per the Medication Adherence Reporting Scale. Structural equation modelling was used to describe simultaneous associations between adherence, weight loss and HbA1c goal attainment. RESULTS: Inclusion criteria were met by 477 patients; mean (SD) age 59.1 (11.6) years; 50.9% were female; 30.4% were treatment naïve; baseline HbA1c 8.6% (1.6); weight 102.0 kg (23.0). Most patients (67.9%) reported being adherent to the index diabetes medication. At 6 months mean weight change was -1.3 (5.1) kg (p = 0.39); 28.1% had weight loss of ≥ 3%. Mean HbA1c change was -1.2% (1.8) (p< 0.001); 42.8% attained HbA1c goal. Adherent patients (OR 1.70; p = 0.02) and diabetes therapies that lead to weight loss (metformin, GLP-1) were associated with weight loss ≥ 3% (OR 2.96; p< 0.001). Weight loss (OR 3.60; p < 0.001) and adherence (OR 1.59; p < 0.001) were associated with HbA1c goal attainment. CONCLUSIONS: Weight loss ≥ 3% and medication adherence were associated with HbA1c goal attainment in T2DM; weight loss was a stronger predictor of goal attainment than medication adherence in this study population. It is important to consider weight-effect properties, in addition to patient-centric adherence counselling, when prescribing diabetes therapy.

Dapagliflozin compared with other oral anti-diabetes treatments when added to metformin monotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIMS: Indirect evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was used to estimate the effect of dapagliflozin, a new agent with a novel mechanism of action (SGLT-2 inhibition), relative to other anti-diabetes therapies after 1 year of treatment. METHODS: A systematic literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of RCTs involving anti-diabetes treatments added to metformin were conducted. RCTs enrolling subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy were included. Comparators included dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, thiazolidinediones (TZDs), sulphonylureas, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues and dapagliflozin. Outcomes of interest were mean change from baseline HbA1c, weight and systolic blood pressure, and incidence of hypoglycaemia. RESULTS: From 4270 abstracts, six RCTs were included in the primary analysis; no RCTs involving GLP-1 analogues met primary inclusion criteria. All RCTs were actively controlled with sulphonylureas. The mean change in HbA1c from baseline was similar across comparators. The treatment effect (95% credible interval) of dapagliflozin on HbA1c was -0.08% (-0.25, 0.10) relative to DPP-4 inhibitors, -0.02% (-0.24, 0.21) relative to TZDs and 0.00% (-0.16, 0.16) relative to sulphonylureas. Non-sulphonylureas showed significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia relative to sulphonylureas. Dapagliflozin had a significant effect on weight change: the relative difference was -2.74 kg (-5.35, -0.10) compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, and -4.67 kg (-7.03, -2.35) compared with sulphonylureas. Systolic blood pressure was not meta-analysed due to infrequent reporting. CONCLUSION: Compared with DPP-4 inhibitors, TZDs and sulphonylureas, dapagliflozin offers similar HbA1c control after 1 year, with similar or reduced risk of hypoglycaemia and the additional benefit of weight loss, when added to metformin.

Evaluation of hospitalization and follow-up care costs among patients hospitalized with ACS treated with a stent and clopidogrel.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective claims study was performed to evaluate the initial and subsequent healthcare costs in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who had been treated with stent placement and clopidogrel following discharge from the hospital. METHOD AND RESULTS: This was a retrospective, administrative claims-based analysis from a large, geographically diverse US managed care plan affiliated with i3 Innovus. Study subjects were commercially insured enrollees, aged > or = 18, who were hospitalized for ACS between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2004 with a stent placed, and had at least one filled prescription for clopidogrel within 7 days of discharge from the index hospitalization. Of the 9135 subjects included in the cost analysis, 2241 subjects experienced a subsequent event. On average, subjects with a second event incurred $32,495 more in medical costs over 2 years and $39,742 more in medical costs over 3 years versus those who did not have a second event. Excluding ischemic hospitalizations, subjects with a second event incurred $7257 and $9724 more in medical costs than patients without a second event during the 2 and 3 years following discharge from the index hospitalization, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Significant cost increases were observed among patients who had a subsequent hospitalization for an ischemic event compared to those without a subsequent hospitalization. Cost increases were still present after excluding costs of the ischemic hospitalizations. The findings of this study must be considered within the limitations of database analysis as claims data are collected for the purpose of payment and not research.

Anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation: a retrospective claims data analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the risk of thrombo embolic events and bleeding complications among atrial fibrillation patients. METHODS: A cohort of patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation were identified from medical claims (diagnosis codes 427.31 and 427.32). Subjects were identified from 1 January 1998-31 December 2000 and were continuously enrolled for 6 months prior to the first occurring atrial fibrillation medical claim. Cox proportional hazards analysis with time varying covariates was used for the event analysis. RESULTS: Of 6764 subjects retained for analysis, 3541 (52.4%) were exposed to warfarin. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, warfarin exposure was associated with lower likelihood of an arterial thromboembolic event compared to no exposure (HR: 0.710, CI: 0.540-0.934). No benefit was found in the use of warfarin in the prevention of intracranial events (HR: 1.119, CI: 0.929-1.349). Use of warfarin increased the risk of minor bleeding events (HR: 3.600, CI: 2.537-5.109), and all bleeding events (HR: 1.502, CI: 1.289-1.749). CONCLUSIONS: The risk of arterial thromboembolic events was associated with warfarin exposure as expected. An increase in the risk of minor and total bleeding events among patients treated with warfarin was observed. The results of this study suggest that there may be a gap between the clinical trial and coagulation clinic performance of warfarin in reducing the risk of thromboembolic events versus what is achievable in general practice.