Risk of deaths due to injuries in travellers: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Annual global travel reached an all-time high of 1.4 billion international tourist visits in 2019. It is estimated that injury accounts for close to 25% of deaths in travellers, most of which are theoretically preventable. However, there are limited data available on injury occurrence and outcomes in travellers. Our objective was to better understand the relative risk of dying from injury that arises from the novel environments and behavioural changes associated with foreign travel. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted (PubMed, Embase and Scopus) according to PRISMA guidelines that included studies published in English since 1990 that reported injury deaths in tourists per 100 000-person years or as a proportion of total tourist deaths in comparison to a non-traveller population. We also included studies that reported data allowing calculation of these rates. Relative rates or proportions of overall injury mortality, mortality due to traffic accidents, drowning and homicide were summarized. RESULTS: In total, 1847 articles were identified, 105 underwent full-text review, and 10 articles were suitable for data extraction. There was great variability of relative risk reported, but overall, travellers appear to have a higher risk of injury mortality than domestic populations, with relative rates of injury death ranging from 1.04 to 16.7 and proportionate mortality ratios ranging from 1.43 to 3. CONCLUSIONS: Tourists should be aware of the increased risk of dying from road traffic hazards, drowning and homicide while traveling abroad. Specific geographies and activities associated with higher risk should be emphasized. Travel medicine practitioners and organizations that send people abroad should counsel travellers regarding these risks and seek ways to reduce them, including encouraging potential risk-mitigating behaviours. There is a need to improve systems of data collection and reporting on injury deaths in travellers and to study the impact of pre-travel and institutional interventions aimed at reducing this risk.

Impact of a focused trauma course on retention of provider skills, knowledge and confidence at a regional hospital in the Dominican Republic.

INTRODUCTION: Road traffic accidents are a public health epidemic, causing significant morbidity and mortality in low- and middle-income countries. The Dominican Republic (DR) ranks among the highest road traffic fatality rates in the world. There is no formalized trauma curriculum in the DR. A short trauma course was implemented at a San Pedro de Macoris, DR hospital with pre-, post- and retention evaluation of the knowledge, skills and confidence of the providers. METHODS: A 4-day trauma course was developed for medical students and residents. On days 1 and 4, providers completed pre- and post-training assessments consisting of a 40-question written exam, 1 simulation case and a trauma confidence questionnaire. Simulation cases were evaluated using a critical actions checklist and a non-technical skills scale (TNOTECHS). Assessments were repeated in 2 months to evaluate for knowledge, skill and confidence retention. A repeated measures ANOVA model was used to evaluate pre-, post- and retention training differences in the written exam, non-technical skills and critical actions scores. Confidence scores were assessed using a cumulative logistic regression model. RESULTS: A total of 65 people participated (36 medical students, 22 EM and 7 family medicine residents). Of the 65 participants, 39, 22 and 21 participants had complete scores for pre-post, pre-retention and post-retention comparisons respectively. Mean test scores for the written exam were 37.2, 63.5 and 52.2 for pre, post and retention results respectively. Comparisons between pre and post as well as pre and retention showed statistically significant differences (p=0.0001). Mean TNOTECHS total scores were 15.8, 21.3 and 20.8 for pre-, post- and retention results respectively with a significant difference found between pre- and post- training and pre- and retention training (p <0.05). Simulation mean checklist scores were 57.7%, 67.8% and 74.1% for pre-, post- and retention training respectively with a significant difference established between pre- and retention scores (p<0.05). Provider opinion that their ED patients received best care possible and patients' needs were identified and addressed showed statistically significant increases. CONCLUSION: A short trauma course can improve trauma specific knowledge, skills and confidence with significant retention at two months. A longitudinal trauma curriculum may bolster retention.