Efficacy of an integrated continuing medical education (CME) and quality improvement (QI) program on radiation oncologist (RO) clinical practice.

PURPOSE: There has been little radiation oncologist (RO)-specific research in continuing medical education (CME) or quality improvement (QI) program efficacy. Our aim was to evaluate a CME/QI program for changes in RO behavior, performance, and adherence to department protocols/studies over the first 12 months of the program. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The CME/QI program combined chart audit with feedback (C-AWF), simulation review AWF (SR-AWF), reminder checklists, and targeted CME tutorials. Between April 2003 and March 2004, management of 75 patients was evaluated by chart audit with feedback (C-AWF) and 178 patients via simulation review audit (SR-AWF) using a validated instrument. Scores were presented, and case management was discussed with individualized educational feedback. RO behavior and performance was compared over the first year of the program. RESULTS: Comparing the first and second 6 months, there was a significant improvement in mean behavior (12.7-13.6 of 14, p = 0.0005) and RO performance (7.6-7.9 of 8, p = 0.018) scores. Protocol/study adherence significantly improved from 90.3% to 96.6% (p = 0.005). A total of 50 actions were generated, including the identification of learning needs to direct CME tutorials, the systematic change of suboptimal RO practice, and the alteration of deficient management of 3% of patients audited during the program. CONCLUSION: An integrated CME/QI program combining C-AWF, SR-AWF, QI reminders, and targeted CME tutorials effectively improved targeted RO behavior and performance over a 12-month period. There was a corresponding increase in departmental protocol and study adherence.

A study of complications arising from different methods of anesthesia used in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

The purpose of this report is to review the complications related to different methods of anesthesia for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma. All patients diagnosed with cervical cancer between 1999 and 2002 treated with 3-channel HDR brachytherapy were entered. Complications due to anesthesia for each fraction of brachytherapy were graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria. Eighty-four fractions of brachytherapy were delivered to 18 patients: 19 fractions with patients under general anesthesia (GA), 41 with patients under topical anesthesia and sedation, 5 with patients under paracervical nerve block, and 19 with patients under conscious sedation. Thirteen complications were reported: 12 related to GA and 1 due to paracervical nerve block. Of complications due to GA, 7 were grade 1 and 5 were grade 2. The complication due to paracervical nerve block (seizure) was grade 3. GA had significantly more complications than topical anesthesia or conscious sedation (both P < 0.001). HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer under GA has significantly more complications than other methods. Given the increasing use of fractionated 3-channel brachytherapy, further investigation of risks and benefits of anesthetic techniques is required.

Evaluation of a radiotherapy protocol based on INT0116 for completely resected gastric adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: With the results of the INT0116 study, adjuvant radiochemotherapy has become the standard treatment after complete resection of gastric adenocarcinoma. However, the implementation of radiotherapy (RT) remains a concern. In response, consensus guidelines on RT technique have been published. Our objective was to measure the inter- and intraclinician variability in RT field delineation using conventional two- (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1999 and 2003, five radiation oncologists (ROs) treated 45 patients with completely resected, gastric adenocarcinoma using postoperative radiochemotherapy (INT0116). Two cases were included in this study (Patient 1 had cardia and Patient 2 had antral disease). Standardized vignettes (with surgical and pathologic findings) and preoperative and postoperative imaging for each case were developed. Each RO designed AP-PA fields for each patient (2D planning) on two separate occasions. This was repeated using a 3D planning technique. RESULTS: Patient 1 had a mean field area of 250.2 cm(2) (SD 12.0) and 227.9 cm(2) (SD 26.5) using 2D and 3D planning, respectively (p = 0.03). The mean clinical target volume (CTV) volume was 468.3 cm(3) (SD 65.9). Patient 1 had a significantly greater inter- than intra-RO variation for the field area designed with 3D planning; however, no difference occurred with 2D planning or CTV contouring. Patient 2 had a mean field area of 234.8 cm(2) (SD 33.1) and 226.8 cm(2) (SD 19.3) using 2D and 3D planning, respectively (p = 0.5). The mean CTV was 729.4 cm(3) (SD 67.3). For Patient 2, the inter-RO variability was significantly greater than the intra-RO variability for the field area using both 2D and 3D planning, and no difference was seen for the CTV. Composite beam's-eye-view plots revealed that the superior, inferior, and right lateral borders proved to be most contentious. CONCLUSION: Despite published guidelines and a departmental protocol, significant variations in the RT field areas were seen among ROs for both 2D and 3D planning. However, in general, CTV contouring was reproducible. Because 3D-RT hinges on accurate target identification, caution should be exercised before migrating to 3D planning for postoperative gastric cancer.

A comparison of RANZCR and Singapore-designed radiation oncology practice audit instruments: how does reproducibility affect future approaches to revalidation?

Physician competency assessment requires the use of validated methods and instruments. The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) developed a draft audit form to be evaluated as a competency assessment instrument for radiation oncologists (ROs) in Australasia. We evaluated the reliability of the RANZCR instrument as well as a separate The Cancer Institute (TCI) Singapore-designed instrument by having two ROs perform an independent chart review of 80 randomly selected patients seen at The Cancer Institute (TCI), Singapore. Both RANZCR and TCI Singapore instruments were used to score each chart. Inter- and intra-observer reliability for both audit instruments were compared using misclassification rates as the primary end-point. Overall, for inter-observer reproducibility, 2.3% of TCI Singapore items were misclassified compared to 22.3% of RANZCR items (P < 0.0001, 100.00% confidence that TCI instrument has less inter-observer misclassification). For intra-observer reproducibility, 2.4% of TCI Singapore items were misclassified compared to 13.6% of RANZCR items (P < 0.0001, 100.00% confidence that TCI instrument has less intra-observer misclassification). The proposed RANZCR RO revalidation audit instrument requires further refinement to improve validity. Several items require modification or removal because of lack of reliability, whereas inclusion of other important and reproducible items can be incorporated as demonstrated by the TCI Singapore instrument. The TCI Singapore instrument also has the advantage of incorporating a simple scoring system and criticality index to allow discrimination between ROs and comparisons against future College standards.

Adjuvant high-dose rate brachytherapy after chemoradiation for treatment of early T-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

The local control of nasopharyngeal carcinoma after conventional radiotherapy has historically been suboptimal. Recently, investigators have reported improved outcomes for this patient population with the use of combined chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this analysis of our prospective treatment protocol was to evaluate the additional value of high-dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy (HDRIB) on the disease response, local control, and survival. Between March 1999 and January 2001, 16 patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced (stage III and IV) nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated prospectively at the Radiation Oncology Department of the National University Hospital of Singapore. All patients were staged according to the AJCC (1997) Staging System and had early T stages (T1 and T2). Treatments included concurrent external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy as follows: 66 Gy to the primary tumor in conventional fractionation with cisplatin based concurrent chemotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. Ten Gy of HDRIB in 2 weekly fractions were delivered after the completion of EBRT to all 16 patients. All patients were evaluable for treatment response, local control, survival, and toxicity analysis. The median follow-up for the whole group of patients was 18 months (range: 10-34 months). All patients obtained pathologic complete response at the primary site at 4 months after the completion of the treatment. At the time of this analysis, 15 (93.8%) patients are alive with no evidence of disease. One patient (6.2%) developed locoregional recurrence in the neck at 9 months, and distant metastasis at 11 months after the completion of treatment. Our experience has shown adjuvant HDRIB after concurrent chemoradiation offers encouraging disease response, local control, and survival. A prospective study is being planned to further evaluate the role of adjuvant HDRIB after concurrent chemoradiation on treatment outcome.

Patient preference for radiotherapy fractionation schedule in the palliation of painful bone metastases.

PURPOSE: The radiotherapeutic management of painful bone metastases is controversial, with several institutional and national guidelines advocating use of single-fraction radiotherapy. We aimed to determine patient choice of fractionation schedule after involvement in the decision-making process by use of a decision board. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Advantages and disadvantages of two fractionation schedules (24 Gy in six fractions v 8 Gy in one fraction) used in the randomized Dutch Bone Metastasis Study were discussed with patients using a decision board. Patients were asked to choose a fractionation schedule, to give reasons for their choice, and to indicate level of satisfaction with being involved in decision making. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were entered. Eighty-five percent (95% confidence interval, 74% to 93%) chose 24 Gy in six fractions over 8 Gy in one fraction (P <.0005). Variables including age, sex, performance status, tumor type, pain score, and paying class were not significantly related to patient choice. Multiple fractionation was chosen for lower re-treatment rates (92%) and fewer fractures (32%). Single-fraction treatment was chosen for cost (11%) and convenience (89%). Eighty-four percent of patients expressed positive opinions about being involved in the decision-making process. CONCLUSION: Decision board instruments are feasible and acceptable in an Asian population. The vast majority of patients preferred 24 Gy fractionated radiotherapy compared with a single fraction of 8 Gy. These results indicate the need for further research in this important area and serve to remind both clinicians and national or institutional policy makers of the importance of individual patient preference in treatment decision making.

Cultural attitudes to cancer management in traditional South-East Asian patients.

Cultural differences might influence patients' attitudes to decision-making for cancer management. In a Western medical system promoting shared decision-making and patient autonomy, the effects of traditional South-East Asian cultural and religious attitudes might provoke confusion for both the patient and health-care provider. Especially in oncology, these beliefs might influence patients' perceptions of diagnosis, symptoms, interventions and approaches to death. For the clinician, the potential conflicts in patient disclosure and discussion of diagnosis are evident, as well as patient avoidance of certain interventions. This review article explores the background and interpretation of cultural aspects experienced by Australasian-trained oncologists working in Singapore. Explanations of traditional health beliefs of South-East Asian patients are outlined, and provide a perspective for oncologists managing similar patients within Australasia's multicultural community.