Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Br Heart J ; 32(2): 209-18, 1970 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5440516

ABSTRACT

A review is given of 457 episodes of atrial fibrillation that occurred in 318 patients and were treated by DC shock. Antidysrhythmic drugs, such as quinidine, procainamide, and propranolol, given singly or in combination, were used concomitantly in 389 instances, and DC shock alone was given in 68 instances. The combined effects of quinidine and DC shock, and of procainamide and DC shock were studied in the experimental animal.Combined DC shock and drug therapy gave a higher conversion rate than DC shock alone, and a statistically significant difference was found in respect of the group of patients receiving procainamide and propranolol together (p<0.01). Antidysrhythmic drugs failed on the whole to reduce the incidence of DC shock-induced dysrhythmias. However, the incidence of certain digitalis and DC shock-induced dysrhythmias was significantly less when propranolol and procainamide were given as pretreatment than when procainamide or quinidine was given alone (p<0.01). In animal experiments, quinidine had no protective action against digitalis and DC shock-induced ectopic tachycardias. Clinical and experimental observations suggest that the cardiotoxicity of these drugs may be enhanced by DC shock. Immediate or delayed post-shock rhythm disorders can be drug related and, therefore, great caution should be exercised in the use of antidysrhythmic drugs in conjunction with DC shock therapy.


Subject(s)
Anti-Arrhythmia Agents/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Electric Countershock , Animals , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Cats , Electrocardiography , Humans , Procainamide/adverse effects , Procainamide/therapeutic use , Propranolol/adverse effects , Propranolol/therapeutic use , Quinidine/adverse effects , Quinidine/therapeutic use
6.
Br Med J ; 4(5625): 245-8, 1968 Oct 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-5682329

ABSTRACT

Of 377 children with accidental poisoning, the commonest ages were 1, 2, and 3. The most important contributory factor was that the poison was kept in an inappropriate place. Most containers were closed, but the children found them easy to open. In some cases the container itself was unsuitable for the contents.THE FREQUENCY OF POISONING IN CHILDHOOD MIGHT BE REDUCED IN SIX MAIN WAYS: (1) a reduction in the quantity of drugs kept in the home; (2) the provision of drug cupboards; (3) the provision of containers that are difficult for children to open, or individually foil-wrapping tablets; (4) making tablets less attractive to children; (5) clear identification of potential poisons; and (6) increasing parental awareness of the circumstances under which poisoning occurs.A plea is made for further sociomedical research into the prevention of poisoning.


Subject(s)
Accident Prevention , Poisoning/epidemiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Labeling , Drug Packaging , Drug Storage , England , Humans , Infant , Poisoning/mortality , Poisoning/prevention & control , Wales
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...