ABSTRACT
Mixed phenotype acute leukaemia (MPAL) is associated with worse overall survival, compared with other acute leukaemias in adults. Lack of clear treatment guidelines makes the therapy challenging. ALL-like induction and consolidation treatment followed by allo-HSCT is the preferred first-line treatment. We present a case of a 36-year-old woman diagnosed with MPAL (EGIL Myelo/B) with KMT2A rearrangement, treated with the PALG-ALL-7 (including PEG-asparaginase) protocol. On day 25 after the induction therapy initiation, numbness of limbs and dizziness were observed. Therefore, the imaging studies (CT and MRI) were performed and a diagnosis of thrombosis of superior sagittal sinus of the brain was established. Routinely performed blood coagulation tests showed prolonged APTT and PT, decreased antithrombin III activity and decreased free protein S concentration. LMWH treatment and substitutional therapy with antithrombin III were started, which resulted in a significant reduction in the thrombosis associated symptoms and improvement of the neurological status after 3 days. After induction and consolidation therapy, the patient obtained complete haematological remission and negative measurable residual disease. Six months after the diagnosis, allo-HSCT was successfully performed. During the 4 months follow-up, the patient remained MRD negative and thrombotic symptoms free. To the best of our knowledge, our communication has been the first report of such complication in an MPAL patient treated with PEG-asparaginase containing protocol in adults. We recommend increased vigilance in patients manifesting any mild neurological symptoms and early decision about the MRI study performance.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Q.Clear is a new Bayesian penalized-likelihood PET reconstruction algorithm. It has been documented that Q.Clear increases the SUVmax values of different malignant lesions. PURPOSE: SUVmax values are crucial for the interpretation of PET/CT images in patients with lymphoma, particularly when the early and final responses to treatment are evaluated. The aim of the study was to systematically analyse the impact of the use of Q.Clear on the interpretation of PET/CT in patients with lymphoma. METHODS: A total of 280 18F-FDG PET/CT scans in patients with lymphoma were performed for staging (sPET), for early treatment response (iPET), after the end of treatment (ePET) and when a relapse of lymphoma was suspected (rPET). Scans were separately reconstructed with two algorithms, Q.Clear and OSEM, and further compared. RESULTS: The stage of lymphoma was concordantly diagnosed in 69/70 patients with both algorithms on sPET. Discordant assessment of the Deauville score (p < 0.001) was found in 11 cases (15.7%) of 70 iPET scans and in 11 cases of 70 ePET scans. An upgrade from a negative to a positive scan by Q.Clear occurred in 3 cases (4.3%) of iPET scans and 7 cases (10.0%) of ePET scans. The results of all 70 rPET scans were concordant. The SUVmax values of the target lymphoma lesions measured with Q.Clear were higher than those measured with OSEM in 88.8% of scans. CONCLUSION: Although the Q.Clear algorithm may alter the interpretations of PET/CT in only a small proportion of patients, we recommend using standard OSEM reconstruction for the assessment of treatment response.
