A review of methods for preventing pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy.

Pancreatic fistula is one of the most severe complications after pancreatic surgeries. The risk of pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy is up to 60%. Effective methods to prevent pancreatic fistula are still sought. A unified definition of pancreatic fistula, which was introduced in 2005 by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS), has allowed for an easier diagnosis and determination of fistula severity, as well as for a reliable inter-center comparison of data. Furthermore, a number of publications point out the risk factors of pancreatic fistula, which may be classified into patient-related risk factors, such as MBI, gender, smoking tobacco or pancreatic structure; and surgery-related risk factors, such as blood loss, prolonged surgery and non-underpinning of the major pancreatic duct. The analysis of risk factors and the use of different methods for the prevention of pancreatic fistula, including novel surgical techniques, may reduce both, the formation and severity of fistula. This will, in turn, lead to reduced secondary complications and mortality, as well as a shorter hospital stay. We present a literature review on different strategies used to prevent pancreatic fistula. It seems, however, that multicenter, prospective, randomized studies in two large groups of patients after pancreatectomy are necessary to establish clear recommendations for the preventive management.

Can round ligament of the liver patch decrease the rate and the grade of postoperative pancreatic fistula?

UNLABELLED: The most serious complication after pancreatic surgical procedures is still a postoperative pancreatic fistula. In clinical practice there are various methods to prevent the formation of pancreatic fistula, but none of them is fully efficient. Recently, the role of grafting the round ligament of the liver on the pancreas is emphasized as a promising procedure which reduces the severity and shortens the healing time of postoperative pancreatic fistula. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of grafting a round ligament patch on the pancreatic stump or the area of the pancreatic anastomosis on the severity and healing of pancreatic fistula after surgical treatment of the pancreas (alternatively on prevention of pancreatic fistula formation). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective study covered patients operated due to pancreatic tumors in the Department of General, Gastrointestinal and Oncologic Surgery of the WUM. Pancreatic fistula was diagnosed according to the definition developed by the ISGPS (International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery). RESULTS: 10 patients with pancreatic tumors of different location were operated. The round ligament was grafted on the pancreatic stump, the area of the pancreatic anastomosis or on the site of the local tumor removal. Pancreatic fistula developed in 9 patients, including grade A pancreatic fistula in 5 patients, grade B fistula in 3 patients, and grade C fistula in 1 patient. Distant complications occurred in one patient. None of the patients required a reoperation and no deaths were reported. The average hospital stay was 22.4 days. The hospital stay of patients with grade A fistula was shorter than in case of patients with grade B and C fistula. CONCLUSIONS: Grafting of the round ligament of the liver on the pancreatic stump did not prevent the development pancreatic fistula. Grade A pancreatic fistula developed most often. Grade C fistula developed in 1 patient and was complicated by intraabdominal abscesses and sepsis. Although the patient did not require a repeated surgery, but only a continuation of conservative treatment on an outpatient basis. Patients with grade B fistula required prolonged drainage and in the end were supervised by the surgical polyclinic.

Combined minimally invasive management of infected pancreatic necrosis: a case report.

Infected necrosis is a potentially fatal complication of necrotizing pancreatitis. Open surgical debridement is the mainstay management of infected pancreatic necrosis. Over the last decade minimally invasive techniques have been increasingly used for the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis and their results are encouraging. However, the optimal technique of minimal access necrosectomy and the timing of intervention have not been established yet. Patients with septic complications of acute pancreatitis represent a challenging group which requires individualized management often involving numerous techniques. We report a case of a 52-year-old patient in whom 3 minimally invasive techniques were needed for complete recovery.

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous drainage of infected pancreatic necrosis.

BACKGROUND: The role of percutaneous drainage in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis remains controversial, and ultrasound-guided technique is rarely used for this indication. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sonographically guided percutaneous catheter drainage for infected pancreatic necrosis. METHODS: The patient group consisted of 16 men and 2 women. The mean age of the patients was 47 years. The median computed tomography severity index of acute pancreatitis was 10 points. Percutaneous catheter drainage was performed under sonographic guidance using preferably retroperitoneal approach, and transperitoneal access in selected cases. The medical records and imaging scans were reviewed retrospectively for each patient. RESULTS: Percutaneous catheter drainage resulted in a complete resolution of infected pancreatic necrosis in 6 of 18 patients (33 %). Twelve of 18 patients who were initially managed with PCD required eventually necrosectomy (67 %). The most common reason for crossover to surgical intervention was persistent sepsis (n = 7). Open necrosectomy was performed in 4 of these patients, and 3 patients underwent successful minimally invasive retroperitoneal necrosectomy. Five patients required conversion to open surgery because of procedure-related complications. In 3 cases, there was leakage of the necrotic material into the peritoneal cavity. Two other patients experienced hemorrhagic complications. Overall mortality rate was 17 %. The size of the largest necrotic collection in patients who were successfully treated with percutaneous drainage decreased by a median of 76 % shortly after the procedure, whereas it decreased only by a median of 16 % in cases of failure of percutaneous drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage used in infected pancreatic necrosis is a technique with acceptably low morbidity and mortality that may be the definitive treatment or a bridge management to necrosectomy. A negligible decrease in size of the necrotic collection predicts failure of percutaneous drainage.