Comparison of high or modified low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis comparing the oncological, intraoperative and safety outcomes in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery with and without preservation of the left colic artery (LCA). METHOD: We searched several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. This meta-analysis included randomized clinical trials, prospective, and retrospective comparative studies regarding high- or modified low-tie ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. RESULTS: Of 641 potentially eligible articles, 16 studies with 3050 participants met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated blood loss (WMD -2.63, 95% CI -5.69 to 0.43; P = .09), the number of harvested lymph nodes (WMD -0.35, 95% CI -1.60 to 0.20; P = .50), the number of apical lymph node yield (WMD -0.19, 95% CI -0.52 to 0.13; P = .24), the number of apical lymph node metastasis (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.40 to 1.45; P = .40), rate of conversion to open surgery (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.09; P = .513), rate of urinary dysfunction (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.71 to 2.74; P = .34), rate of recurrence and metastasis (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.61; P = .64), 5-year survival rate (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.18; P = .42). However, this meta-analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference in operating time (WMD -9.92, 95% CI -15.49 to -5.84; P = .0005), rate of diverting stom (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.92; P = .02), rate of anastomotic leakage (OR 2.673, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.62; P < .00001), time to first flatus (WMD 0.29, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.48; P = .002), time of hospitalization (WMD 0.64, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.15; P = .01) between the 2 surgical techniques. COCLUSION: The available evidence suggests that preserving the left colic artery is a safe, effective technique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer. nique for patients with laparoscopic rectal cancer.

A retrospective cohort study of clinical value of PRL-3 in stage III human colorectal cancer.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of phosphatase of regenerating live-3 (PRL-3) in human stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) and to evaluate its correlation with metachronous liver metastasis (MLM) and prognosis.The retrospective cohort study included 116 stage III CRC primary tumors and 60 normal colorectal tissues. PRL-3 expression was measured by immunohistochemistry. We investigated the correlation of PRL-3 with clinicopathologic features by the chi-square test. The association of PRL-3 expression with MLM was assessed by binary logistic regression. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between patients with positive PRL-3 expression and those with negative PRL-3 expression were compared by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model.We found that 32.8% of stage III CRC primary tumors were PRL-3 positive, and 15.0% of normal colorectal epithelia showed high PRL-3 expression (P = .012). Seventeen tumors (47.2%) among 36 cases that developed MLM were PRL-3 positive, and only 21 tumors (26.3%) in the 80 cases that did not develop MLM had positive PRL-3 expression (P = .026). PRL-3 expression was associated with MLM (P = .028). Patients with positive expression of PRL-3 showed a significantly shorter OS (40.32 ±â€Š3.97 vs 53.96 ±â€Š2.77 months, P = .009) and DFS (34.97 ±â€Š4.30 vs 44.48 ±â€Š2.89 months, P = .036). A multivariate analysis indicated that PRL-3 expression was an independent unfavorable prognostic factor for OS (P = .007).Our study suggested that high PRL-3 expression is an independent risk factor for MLM and poor prognosis. PRL-3 is expected to be a promising biomarker for predicting the incidence of MLM and prognosis in patients with stage III CRC.

[Enhanced recovery after preserving the left colonic artery during laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the postoperative outcomes of preserving the left colonic artery during laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer. METHODS: The clinicopathologic data of 91 rectal cancer patients (pathologic Stage II) undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection was retrospectively analyzed. During the surgeries, the left colonic artery was preserved in 40 patients (preserved group) and ligated in 51 patients (unpreserved group). The operating time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus and defecation, duration of postoperative abdominal distension and pain, number of retrieved lymph nodes, ileum fistulation and anatomical leakage rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The surgeries were completed in all the 91 patients laparoscopically without conversion. There was no intraoperative complications including rectal perforation, injury to vessel or ureter in either group. The operating time, blood loss and number of retrieved lymph nodes were similar between the groups (P>0.05). Three patients in preserved group and 5 in ligation group received preventive ileum fistulation due to low rectal cancer. Anatomical leakage occurred in three patients of unpreserved group. The average duration of postoperative abdominal distension and pain was 2.14∓0.35 days in preserved group and 3.15∓0.42 days in ligation group. The time to first flatus and defecation was 37.15∓12.62 h and 3.16∓0.52 days in preserved group and 62.25∓11.75 h and 4.25∓0.75 days in ligation group. Postoperative hospital stay was 4.54∓0.42 days in preserved group and 6.23∓0.51 days in ligation group. Total hospitalization cost in the two groups was 34 525.32∓1206.36 Yuan and 41 215∓1051.32 Yuan, respectively. Significant differences were found the in duration of postoperative abdominal distension and pain, postoperative hospital stay, and total cost between the two groups (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: During laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer, preserving the left colonic artery effectively ensures the blood supply to the anastomosis and the remaining descending colon to promote the recovery of the patients after surgery.

Efficacy of Laparoscopic Primary Repair in the Treatment of Colonic Perforation After Colonoscopy: A Review of 40,127 Patients.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, increasing colonoscopy use increases the incidence of colonic perforation. Colonic perforation during colonoscopy is a rare but extremely serious complication. Traditionally, the management of colonic perforation is explorative laparotomy with bowel resection. Treatment using laparoscopic approach is a novel approach, and has been reported in some recent literatures. Nowadays, the using of laparoscopic primary repair in treatment of colonoscopic perforations has not been confirmed. This study retrospectively reviewed our experiences in treating colonoscopic perforations by laparoscopic primary repair. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the laparoscopic primary repair in the treatment of colonic perforations during colonoscopy. METHODS: Between January 2003 and December 2014, data were collected retrospectively on all patients who underwent colonoscopy and compared the recovery parameters and morbidity of patients who underwent laparoscopic primary repair versus those who had open surgery. RESULTS: A total of 40,127 colonoscopies were performed during the study period. There were 24 patients who underwent primary repair [13 underwent laparoscopic surgery (LS) and 8 underwent open surgery (OS)]. There were no demographic differences between the LS and OS groups (P>0.05). Compared with OS group, patients who underwent laparoscopic repair had a significantly shorter incision length (LS: 3.15±0.35 mm vs. OS: 12.60±2.87 mm, P=0.000), fewer blood loss (LS: 28.54±10.82 mL vs. OS: 159.25±46.90 mL, P=0.000), shorter postoperative hospital stay (LS: 8.31±1.93 d vs. OS: 12.38±1.41 d, P=0.000), and shorter postoperative fasting time (LS: 3.38±0.7 d vs. OS: 5.25±0.71 d, P=0.000). The operative time of LS group was a little longer than OS group, but there were no significant differences (LS: 86.31±22.22 min vs. OS: 75.125 ±14.24 min, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic primary repair is safe and effective in resolving colonic perforation due to colonoscopy, and it might offer benefits over the open approach.

The operation experience of endoscopic thyroidectomy by areola and axilla approach.

To explore the feasibility of endoscopic thyroidectomy via breast areola and axilla approach. The clinical data of 36 cases that underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy via breast areola and axilla approach from February 2012 to December 2013 were reviewed. All cases were completed, the mean operation time was 136.3 min (95-183 min), intraoperative blood loss was 15.8 ml (5-60 ml). The average hospitalization time was 5 days (4-6 days). There were no conversions to open surgery, no permanent nerve injuries, and no cases of hypoparathyroidism. Three patients had postoperative subcutaneous ecchymosis who were cured spontaneously after 1 month. Endoscopic thyroidectomy is safe and feasible for patients with thyroid diseases with good cosmetic results, and is worthy of being widely applied for patients who have cosmetic demand.