ABSTRACT
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically challenging as a result of a lack of depth perception. The present article investigated the 3-D endoscope for carrying out ESD and translated the technique from bench to clinical use. In a preclinical porcine experiment, ESD using a 3-D endoscope was compared between an experienced and a novice endoscopist. All ESD were completed without perforation. Median operative time per surface area was significantly lower for the experienced endoscopist than for the novice (197.9 s/cm2 vs 434.7 s/cm2 ; P = 0.05). The second part was a prospective clinical experience to evaluate use of the 3-D endoscope for carrying out ESD. Ten patients received ESD using the 3-D endoscope. Four patients had gastric ESD, two had duodenal ESD and four had sigmoid and rectal ESD. There were no complications, whereas ESD failed in one patient who had gastric neoplasia at anastomosis. Mean operative time was 99.4 min, and operative time per surface area resection was 391 s/cm2 . The operating endoscopist did not complain of motion sickness, whereas the assistants had some dizziness upon prolonged ESD procedure. This study showed that carrying out ESD was safe and effective using a 3-D endoscope with an excellent 3-D view enhancing depth perception. Future study should be conducted to compare 3-D against 2-D endoscopes for ESD.
Subject(s)
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/instrumentation , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Animals , Equipment Design , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Operative Time , Prospective Studies , SwineABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this article is to evaluate the relationship between off-hours hospital admission (weekends, public holidays or nighttime) and mortality for upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage (UGIH). METHODS: Medline, Embase, Scopus, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature were searched through December 2016 to identify eligible records for inclusion in this meta-analysis. A random-effects model was applied. RESULTS: Twenty cohort studies were included for analysis. Patients with UGIH who were admitted during off-hours had a significantly higher mortality and were less likely to receive endoscopy within 24 hours of admission. In comparison to variceal cases, patients with nonvariceal bleeding showed a higher mortality when admitted during off-hours. However, for studies conducted in hospitals that provided endoscopy outside normal hours, off-hours admission was not associated with an increased risk of mortality. CONCLUSION: Our study showed a higher mortality for patients with nonvariceal UGIH who were admitted during off-hours, while this effect might be offset in hospitals with a formal out-of-hours endoscopy on-call rotation.
ABSTRACT
The objective of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic colorectal surgery by comparing open operation within fast track (FT) programs. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase and Chinese Biological Medicine Database were searched to identify all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing laparoscopic with open colorectal resection within FT programs. A total of seven RCTs were finally included, enrolling 714 patients with colorectal cancer: 373 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery and FT programs (laparoscopic/FT group) and 341 patients received open operation and FT programs (open/FT group). Postoperative hospital stay (weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.66; 95% CI: 0.27 - 1.04; P < 0.05), total hospital stay (WMD: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.40 - 2.51; P < 0.05) and overall complications (RR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.12 - 1.54; P < 0.05) were significantly lower in laparoscopic/FT group than in open/FT group. However, no statistically significant differences on mortality (risk ratio (RR): 2.26; 95% CI: 0.62 - 8.22; P = 0.21), overall surgical complications (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.94 - 1.51; P = 0.15) and readmission rates (RR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.79 - 2.22; P = 0.28) were found between both groups. The laparoscopic colorectal surgery combined with FT programs shows high-level evidence on shortening postoperative and total hospital stay, reducing overall complications without compromising patients' safety.
ABSTRACT
To determine whether treatment with omega-3 fatty acids (ω-3 FA) provides benefits to patients with acute pancreatitis (AP). The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database were searched. Data analysis was performed using Revman 5.2 software. A total of eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. Overall, ω-3 FA treatment resulted in a significantly reduced risk of mortality (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.16 to 0.75, p < 0.05), infectious complications (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.85, p < 0.05) and length of hospital stay (MD -6.50; 95% CI -9.54 to -3.46, p < 0.05), but not length of ICU stay (MD -1.98; 95% CI -6.92 to 2.96, p > 0.05). In subgroup analysis, only patients who received ω-3 FA parenterally had some statistically significant benefits in terms of mortality (risk ratio (RR) 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.86, p < 0.05), infectious complications (RR 0.5; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.9, p < 0.05) and length of hospital stay (mean difference (MD) -8.13; 95% CI -10.39 to -5.87, p < 0.001). The administration of ω-3 FA may be beneficial for decreasing mortality, infectious complications, and length of hospital stay in AP, especially when used parenterally. Large and rigorously designed RCTs are required to elucidate the efficacy of parenteral or enteral ω-3 FA treatment in AP.
