Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Eur J Pharmacol ; 890: 173659, 2021 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33131637

ABSTRACT

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the pathogen of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), is currently spreading around the world. The WHO declared on January 31 that the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 was a public health emergency. SARS-Cov-2 is a member of highly pathogenic coronavirus group that also consists of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV). Although respiratory tract lesions were regarded as main manifestation of SARS-Cov-2 infection, gastrointestinal lesions were also reported. Similarly, patients with SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV were also observed. Common gastrointestinal symptoms of patients mainly included diarrhea, vomiting and abdominal pain. Gastrointestinal lesions could be used as basis for early diagnosis of patients, and at the same time, controlling gastrointestinal lesions better facilitated to cut off the route of fecal-oral transmission. Hence, this review summarizes the characteristics and mechanism of gastrointestinal lesions caused by three highly pathogenic human coronavirus infections including SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, as well as SARS-CoV-2. Furthermore, it is expected to gain experience from gastrointestinal lesions caused by SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV infections in order to be able to better relieve SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Targetin gut microbiota to regulate the process of SARS-CoV-2 infection should be a concern. Especially, the application of nanotechnology may provide help for further controlling COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Gastrointestinal Diseases/etiology , Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus , SARS-CoV-2 , Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus , Animals , Humans
2.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 47(1): 14-8, 2012 Jan.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22455687

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate clinical effect and safety of in vitro maturation (IVM) of human immature oocytes in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome by comparing with conventional in vitro fertilization(IVF)and intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI). METHODS: From Jan. 2003 to Dec. 2009, 157 infertile women with PCOS underwent 162 cycles IVM in Center for Reproductive Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. In the mean time, 109 patients with PCOS underwent 114 IVF/ICSI cycles as control group 1 and 106 patients with other factors underwent 106 IVF/ICSI cycles as control group 2. Treatment and outcome of pregnancy and infant were compared among those 3 groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference were found in terms of the positive rate of hCG in urine [35.7% (56/157), 42.2% (46/109), 44.3% (47/106)], the rate of clinical pregnancy [29.3% (46/157), 37.6% (41/109), 41.5% (44/106)], the rate of entopic pregnancy [1.9% (3/157), 1.8% (2/109), 0.9% (1/106)], the rate of miscarriage [18.6% (8/43), 12.8% (5/39), 20.9% (9/43)] and the rate of live-birth [22.3% (35/157), 31.2% (34/109), 32.1% (34/106)] among three groups (IVM group, control group 1, control group 2, P > 0.05). The rate of preterm labor, low weight newborn, mean birth weight, ratio of male to female did not show significantly difference among 3 groups (P > 0.05). The average control ovarian stimulation was 6 days, the median dose of gonadotropin (Gn) was 675 IU, and the total hospital cost was (8392 ± 1328) RMB in IVM group, which were statistically lower than those in the other two control groups (P < 0.01). The rate of multiple pregnancy was 4.7% (2/43) and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) 0 in IVM group, which were significantly lower than those in the other control group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: In vitro maturation is an effective treatment in infertile women with PCOS, it could obtain the similar pregnancy outcome and reduce total cost, the dosage of gonadotropin-releasing hormone and rate of OHSS compared with conventional IVF/ICSI.


Subject(s)
Infertility, Female/therapy , Oocytes/physiology , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/therapy , Reproductive Techniques, Assisted , Adult , Birth Weight , Case-Control Studies , Cell Culture Techniques , Cells, Cultured , Embryo Transfer , Female , Fertilization in Vitro , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infertility, Female/etiology , Male , Oocytes/cytology , Oogenesis , Ovulation Induction/methods , Polycystic Ovary Syndrome/complications , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Outcome , Retrospective Studies
3.
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi ; 47(12): 915-9, 2012 Dec.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23324191

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between recurrent miscarriages and insulin resistance. METHODS: The case-control studies on the association between recurrent spontaneous abortion and insulin resistance from June 1996 to April 2012 were collected from Medline, Elsevier, Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Chinese Biological Medicine Database, data base of Wanfang, Springer link and EMBASE. RevMan 5.1 software was used for Meta analysis. RESULTS: According to the included criteria, 7 clinical trials were finally selected. Total 467 cases with recurrent pregnancy loss were enrolled in study group, while 413 women with no history of abnormal pregnancies were enrolled in control group. No significant difference was found in average age and body mass index between the two groups (P > 0.05). Meta analysis results showed that the level of fasting glucose was no statistical difference between study group and control group (WMD = 2.27, 95%CI: -1.11 to 5.65, P > 0.05); fasting insulin level was higher 2.05 mU/L in study group than that of in control group, the difference was statistically significant (WMD = 2.05, 95%CI: 1.03 to 3.08, P < 0.01). Case number of study group on Homa-insulin resistance > 4.5 was more than that of control group (OR = 3.36, 95%CI: 1.72 to 6.57, P < 0.01). Case number of study group on glucose/insulin ratio < 4.5 was more than that of the control group, statistical difference was found (OR = 3.37, 95%CI: 1.90 to 5.99, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Insulin resistance is associated with the susceptibility to recurrent miscarriages, and it may contribute to the occurrence of recurrent miscarriages.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Habitual/blood , Blood Glucose/analysis , Insulin Resistance , Insulin/blood , Abortion, Habitual/physiopathology , Adult , Body Mass Index , Case-Control Studies , Fasting , Female , Glucose Tolerance Test , Humans , Pregnancy , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...