Tea polyphenol-derived nanomedicine for targeted photothermal thrombolysis and inflammation suppression.

Thrombotic diseases impose a significant global health burden, and conventional drug-based thrombolytic therapies are encumbered by the risk of bleeding complications. In this study, we introduce a novel drug-free nanomedicine founded on tea polyphenols nanoparticles (TPNs), which exhibits multifaceted capabilities for localized photothermal thrombolysis. TPNs were synthesized through a one-pot process under mild conditions, deriving from the monomeric epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG). Within this process, indocyanine green (ICG) was effectively encapsulated, exploiting multiple intermolecular interactions between EGCG and ICG. While both TPNs and ICG inherently possessed photothermal potential, their synergy significantly enhanced photothermal conversion and stability. Furthermore, the nanomedicine was functionalized with cRGD for targeted delivery to activated platelets within thrombus sites, eliciting robust thrombolysis upon laser irradiation across diverse thrombus types. Importantly, the nanomedicine's potent free radical scavenging abilities concurrently mitigated vascular inflammation, thus diminishing the risk of disease recurrence. In summary, this highly biocompatible multifunctional nanomaterial holds promise as a comprehensive approach that combines thrombolysis with anti-inflammatory actions, offering precision in thrombosis treatment.

Investigation and analysis of Chinese public's cognition for clinical research. / ä¸­å›½å ¬ä¼—å¯¹ä¸´åºŠç ”ç©¶è®¤çŸ¥æƒ å†µçš„è°ƒæŸ¥ä¸Žåˆ†æž.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical research plays a vital role in disease research and population health. The public is the main source of clinical research volunteers. Understanding the public's cognition of clinical research plays a decisive role in the development of clinical research. This study aims to understand the Chinese public's cognition for clinical research and the influencing factors. METHODS: The questionnaire based on Chinese-translated Public Awareness of Research for Therapeutic Advancements through Knowledge and Empowerment (PARTAKE) was used to investigate the public's cognition for clinical research. RESULTS: Of the 2 513 valid respondents, 91.84% had heard of "clinical research", 91.76% of the respondents believed that clinical research was beneficial to society, 65.90% were willing to participate in clinical research, 87.50% believed that confidentiality was a very important thing, 73.70% believed that their personal information had been protected when participating in clinical research, and, 46.40% did not know whether volunteers participating in clinical research could receive adequate compensation. Educational levels, employment status, and annual income impacted in public perceptions of willingness to participate in clinical research, especially in privacy protection, informed consent, whether clinical research is intended for society, compensation for clinical research, and safety of clinical research (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese public's cognition level for clinical research is acceptable, but there is still a lot of room for improvement in privacy protection, informed consent, and compensation. By designing a reasonable knowledge training program for clinical research and using the multimedia, improving access to the relevant knowledge, more public will know about clinical research recruitment information, which is of great significance for the development of clinical research in China.

Study on pharmacokinetic interactions between SHR2554 and itraconazole in healthy subjects: A single-center, open-label phase I trial.

BACKGROUND: SHR2554, a novel oral Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 inhibitor, shows broad-spectrum anti-tumor efficacy in preclinical studies. As SHR2554 is mainly metabolized by CYP3A4, it is helpful to conduct research on the effects of itraconazole, a strong inhibitor of CYP3A4-metabolizing enzymes, on the pharmacokinetic characteristics and safety of SHR2554. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, open-label pharmacokinetic study of itraconazole on SHR2554 in 18 healthy Chinese subjects. Subjects were orally administrated SHR2554 50 mg on Day 1, itraconazole 200 mg Quaque Die (QD) from Days 4 to 7, SHR2554 50 mg co-administrated with itraconazole 200 mg on Day 8, and itraconazole 200 mg QD from Days 9 to 12. Then, 4 ml of venous blood was collected at predetermined time points. Plasma SHR2554 concentrations were analyzed using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using Phoenix WinNonlin v8.1. RESULTS: The Cmax of SHR2554 alone and in combination was 10.197 ± 7.0262 ng·ml-1 versus 70.538 ± 25.0219 ng·ml-1 , AUC0-∞ was 50.99 ± 19.358 h·ng·ml-1 versus 641.53 ± 319.538 h·ng·ml-1 , and AUC0-t was 28.70 ± 18.913 h·ng·ml-1 versus 612.13 ± 315.720 h·ng·ml-1 . Co-administration of SHR2554 and itraconazole caused 7.73-, 12.47-, and 23.75-fold adjusted geometric mean ratios increases in SHR2554 Cmax , AUC0-∞ and AUC0-t respectively. The co-administration regimen was well tolerated and had a good safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with a single dose of SHR2554 50 mg, the exposure of SHR2554 in vivo was significantly affected by the combined administration of itraconazole.

A randomized, double-blind, parallel control study to evaluate the biosimilarity of QL1209 with Perjeta® in healthy male subjects.

Purpose: This is the first study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and, immunogenicity of QL1209, a biosimilar of Perjeta®. Methods: This study was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled clinical trial evaluating the biosimilarity between QL1209 (specification: 420 mg:14 ml, single use via, manufacturer: Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., batch number: 201808001KJL) and Perjeta® (specification: 420 mg: 14 ml, single use via, manufacturer: Roche Pharma AG, batch number: H0309H02). The trial period was 99 days (blood samples for PK were collected 99 days after infusion). Serum concentrations were determined using a validated assay. PK parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model and analyzed statistically. Anti-drug antibody (ADA)-positive samples were further tested for the presence of neutralization antibody detection (NAb). Results: A total of 137 healthy subjects were administrated. The subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive QL1209 or Perjeta® 420 mg intravenously. The geometric mean ratio (GMRs) for QL1209 versus Perjeta® are 104.14%, 104.09%, and 110.59% for Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞, respectively, and their 90% confidence interval (CIs) all fell within the predefined bioequivalence margin 80.00-125%. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 95.6% and 95.5% in the QL1209 and Perjeta® groups, respectively, also comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: The results of this comparative clinical pharmacology study demonstrated the PK similarity of QL1209 (420 mg: 14 ml) and Perjeta® (420 mg: 14 ml) and there was no significant difference in safety and immunogenicity between QL1209 and Perjeta® manufactured by Roche Pharma AG.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, and immunogenicity of a biosimilar of denosumab (LY06006): a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, parallel-controlled clinical study in healthy Chinese subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and immunogenicity of LY06006 (denosumab biosimilar) and denosumab in healthy Chinese adult male subjects. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-controlled, single-dose, comparative biosimilar study, a total of 168 subjects received 60 mg of LY06006 or denosumab by subcutaneous (SC) abdominal injections in a 1:1 ratio with a follow-up period of 168 days. RESULTS: After a single SC abdominal injection of 60 mg LY06006/denosumab, the geometric mean ratio of the main pharmacokinetic parameters, Cmax and AUC0-∞, of the two drugs were 97.57% and 104.27%, respectively; the geometric mean ratio of the main pharmacodynamic parameters AUEC0-t and Emax, were 101.00% and 99.64%, respectively, and the 90% confidence interval was observed to be within 80-125%. The subjects in the test group (LY06006) and control group (denosumab) were all negative for anti-drug antibody (ADA). The incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)were similar for both groups, and no grade 3 or higher TEAEs occurred in either group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that LY06006 and denosumab have similar characteristics and bioequivalence in pharmacokinetics. Moreover, they had similar pharmacodynamic profiles, safety, and immunogenicity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT04973722.

A pharmacokinetic study to comparatively evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 with the reference Herceptin in healthy Chinese subjects.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and bioequivalence of a test humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody targeting human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) with the reference Herceptin®. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The trial consisted of two parts (part I and part II). Part I was an open-label, sequential-cohort dose-escalation study, where 16 healthy subjects were either intravenously infused with QLHER2 (test) at single doses escalating from 0.2 to 6 mg/kg (0.2, 1, 2, 4, and 6 mg/kg) or given 4 mg/kg Herceptin (reference) for evaluating the safety, tolerability, and PK of QLHER2. Part II was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the bioequivalence of QLHER2 and Herceptin in 60 subjects. RESULTS: Following a 1.5-h intravenous infusion of single ascending doses of QLHER2 (1, 2, 4, or 6 mg/kg) in part I, Cmax and Tmax were 19.43-120.01 µg/mL and 68.91-157.87 h, respectively. AUC0-t and CL were 1.91-34.21 h·µg/mL and 0.54-0.12 mL/h/kg, indicating lower clearance at higher doses, with a greater than proportional increase in AUC0-t and t1/2 of 68.91-157.87 h. In part II, serum concentrations were comparable between QLHER2 and Herceptin over a 70-day sampling period, and the QLHER2/Herceptin ratios of Cmax and AUC0-t were 105.90% [90% confidence interval (CI): 95.69%-117.26%] and 95.79% (90% CI: 87.74%-106.40%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The 90% CI value of Cmax and AUC0-t for QLHER2/Herceptin ratio ranged between 80.0%-125.00%, indicating that QLHER2 was bioequivalent to Herceptin. These results support further evaluation of QLHER2. Trial registration number: ChiCTR2000041577 and ChiCTR2100041802. Date of registration: 30th December, 2020 and 5th January 2021.

Pharmacokinetic effects of proton pump inhibitors on the novel PARP inhibitor fluzoparib: a single-arm, fixed-sequence trial in male healthy volunteers.

Purpose To assess the pharmacokinetic (PK) effect of proton pump inhibitors on the novel poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor fluzoparib, and observe the safety of its co-administration with omeprazole. Patients and methods Sixteen male healthy volunteers (HVs) were enrolled in a single-center, single-arm, open-label, fixed-sequence study. HVs took fluzoparib (100 mg, p.o.) after meal consumption on day-1, took omeprazole 40 mg (p.o.) under a fasting condition from day-5 to day-9, and took fluzoparib (100 mg, p.o.) after meal consumption on day-9. Blood samples were collected at predetermined timepoints for PK analyses. Safety was assessed via clinical laboratory tests. The study was registered with the Clinical Trials Registry on 30 September 2019 (NCT04108676). Results The peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) after fluzoparib administration was 2395.17 ± 418.27 ng/mL, the area under the curve (AUC) within 72 h (AUC0 - 72 h) was 26669.09 ± 7320.12 h·ng/mL, and AUC0-∞ was 26897.44 ± 7573.61 h·ng/mL. The Cmax after co-administration of fluzoparib and omeprazole was 2489.43 ± 423.72 ng·mL, AUC0 - 72 h was 30300.49 ± 8350.08 h·ng/mL, and AUC0-∞ was 30678.74 ± 8595.55 h·ng/mL. The geometric mean ratio of Cmax, AUC0 - 72 h and AUC0-∞ was 104.0% (90%CI: 94.8-114.0%), 113.6% (104.2-123.9%) and 104.1% (104.5-124.6%). The number of HVs with adverse reactions was identical (eight) for administration of fluzoparib and co-administration of fluzoparib and omeprazole. Conclusions The proton pump inhibitor omeprazole did not have a significant influence on the PK behavior of fluzoparib, and its safety profile was good upon co-administration with omeprazole. (NCT04108676, 30 September 2019).

Genotype-Guided Dosing of Warfarin in Chinese Adults: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin is an effective treatment for thromboembolic disease but has a narrow therapeutic index; optimal anticoagulation dosage can differ tremendously among individuals. We aimed to evaluate whether genotype-guided warfarin dosing is superior to routine clinical dosing for the outcomes of interest in Chinese patients. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel-controlled trial from September 2014 to April 2017 in 15 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were ≥18 years of age, with atrial fibrillation or deep vein thrombosis without previous treatment of warfarin or a bleeding disorder. Nine follow-up visits were performed during the 12-week study period. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of time in the therapeutic range of the international normalized ratio during the first 12 weeks after starting warfarin therapy. RESULTS: A total of 660 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to a genotype-guided dosing group or a control group under standard dosing. The genotype-guided dosing group had a significantly higher percentage of time in the therapeutic range than the control group (58.8% versus 53.2% [95% CI of group difference, 1.1-10.2]; P=0.01). The genotype-guided dosing group also achieved the target international normalized ratio sooner than the control group. In subgroup analyses, warfarin normal sensitivity group had an even higher percentage of time in the therapeutic range during the first 12 weeks compared with the control group (60.8% versus 48.9% [95% CI, 1.1-24.4]). The incidence of adverse events was low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes of genotype-guided warfarin dosing were superior to those of clinical standard dosing. These findings raise the prospect of precision warfarin treatment in China. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02211326.

Simultaneous determination of Pyragrel, a novel anti-thrombotic agent, and its two primary metabolites in plasma by HPLC-MS/MS.

Pyragrel is a novel thromboxane A2-synthetase inhibitor for the treatment of cerebral infarction, and it is currently being investigated in phase I clinical trials. This paper reports the first reliable LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of Pyragrel and its two main metabolites, M1 and M2, in human plasma. All analytes were extracted from human serum using liquid-phase extraction and separated on a Zorbax EcLipse XDB C18 column using isocratic elution with a mobile phase composed of methanol, water and formic acid (65:35:0.1, v/v/v). Determination of the analytes was achieved by tandem-mass spectrometry with positive electrospray ionization. The multiple reaction monitoring transitions under positive electrospray ionization were performed at m/z 329.0 → m/z 135.9 for Pyragrel, m/z 303.1 → m/z 135.0 for M1, m/z 331.2 → m/z 135.0 for M2, and 482.2 → m/z 258.0 for IS, respectively. The following parameters were validated: specificity, recovery, matrix effects, carry-over, linearity, sample stability under a variety of storage and handling conditions, and stock solution stability. The validated method has been successfully applied to an initial pharmacokinetic study in healthy volunteers following intravenous administrations of 60 mg of Pyragrel, and this method will facilitate further studies involving more comprehensive identification of the metabolic profile of Pyragrel and the appropriate dosage regimen.

Readability and Content Assessment of Informed Consent Forms for Phase II-IV Clinical Trials in China.

PURPOSE: To explore the readability and content integrity of informed consent forms (ICFs) used in China and to compare the quality of Chinese local ICFs with that of international ICFs. METHODS: The length, readability and content of 155 consent documents from phase II-IV drug clinical trials from the Third Xiangya Hospital Ethics Committee from November 2009 to January 2015 were evaluated. Reading difficulty was tested using a readability formula adapted for the Chinese language. An ICF checklist containing 27 required elements was successfully constructed to evaluate content integrity. The description of alternatives to participation was assessed. The quality of ICFs from different sponsorships were also compared. RESULTS: Among the 155 evaluable trials, the ICFs had a median length of 5286 words, corresponding to 7 pages. The median readability score was 4.31 (4.02-4.41), with 63.9% at the 2nd level and 36.1% at the 3rd level. Five of the 27 elements were frequently neglected. The average score for the description of alternatives to participation was 1.06, and 27.7% of the ICFs did not mention any alternatives. Compared with Chinese local ICFs, international ICFs were longer, more readable and contained more of the required elements (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The ICFs used in China were difficult to read for most participants. These forms had poor description of alternatives to participation, and failed to provide a high degree of information disclosure, including an explanation of informed consent, follow-up processing of the data/sample, inclusion/exclusion criteria, double blinding, and unpredictable risks. International ICFs had better readability and content integrity than Chinese local ICFs. More efforts should thus be made to improve the quality of consent documents in China.

Population pharmacokinetics study of dexmedetomidine in Chinese adult patients during spinal anesthesia.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to construct a population pharmacokinetics model for dexmedetomidine used in Chinese adult patients with spinal anesthesia and to identify the key factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine. METHODS: A total of 34 subjects (elderly group: n = 15; young group: n = 19) undergoing spinal anesthesia received dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 0.5 µg×kg(-1) for 10 minutes, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.5 µg×kg-1×h(-1) for 50 minutes. Blood samples were collected until 10 hours after dosing. Laboratory and respiratory parameters, and dexmedetomidine concentrations were measured. A population pharmacokinetic model for dexmedetomidine was constructed using a nonlinear mixed effects model (NONMEM). RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine can be described by a three-compartment model. The respective typical values for clearance (CL), V1, V2, Q2, Q3, and V3 were 0.883 L×min(-1), 17.6 L, 51.5 L, 2.37 L×min(-1), 0.517 L×min(-1), and 44.00 L. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), age, and body weight were key factors affecting CL, V1, and V2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A three-compartment model can be used to describe the pharmacokinetics processing of dexmedetomidine for Chinese adult patients during spinal anesthesia. The population pharmacokinetic of dexmedetomidine was generally in line with results from previous studies.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of dexmedetomidine in elderly patients during spinal anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: The application of dexmedetomidine in patient sedation is generally accepted, though its clinical application is limited because of the lack of information detailing the specific properties among diverse populations of patients. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of dexmedetomidine between elderly and young patients during spinal anesthesia. METHODS: 34 subjects (elderly group: n = 15; young group: n = 19) with spinal anesthesia were enrolled in the present study following the inclusion/exclusion criteria detailed below. All subjects received intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 0.5 µg x kg⁻¹ for 10 minutes and a maintenance dose of 0.5 µg x kg⁻¹ x h⁻¹ for 50 minutes. Plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine were detected by the HPLC-MS/MS method and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using WinNolin software. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the elderly and young subjects in major pharmacokinetic parameters. There was a marked gender difference in the Cmax (peak plasma concentration) and tmax (time to reach Cmax) between genders in elderly subjects, though in this cohort the other pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different. In the young subjects there were no noteworthy variations between genders in pharmacokinetic parameters. There was no significant difference between the two groups in BISAUC(0-t) (the area under the bispectral index-time curve from time 0 to t hours), BISmin (the minimum value of the bispectral index after drug delivery), and or tmin-BIS (bispectral index for the minimum value of time). SBP (systolic blood pressure), DBP (diastolic blood pressure), HR (heart rate), and SpO2(pulse oxygen saturation) developed substantive differences in a time-dependent manner, but there were no statistically significant differences in these four indicators in the time*group at three time points (1 hour, 2 hours, and 3 hours after drug administration); while SBP was significantly different between the groups, this differential declined in a time-dependent manner, and there were no significant attendant differences in the D-value. The observed values and D-values of DBP and HR were similar in the groups, but the observed value and D-value of SpO2did differ. There were 14 drug-related adverse events in the young group, and 26 drug-related adverse events in the elderly group, a 46% differential. The percentage of patients who requiring intervention during surgery was 68.75% (11/16) in the elderly group and 36.84% (7/19) in the young group, with no significant difference between the two groups once age was factored in (p = 0.06). None of the pharmacodynamic indices, however, correlated with the key pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC(0→t), AUC(0→∞)) of dexmedetomidine. CONCLUSIONS: The clearance of dexmedetomidine in elderly patients showed a declining trend compared to young patients. Interventions in the elderly group were more frequent than in the young group, and the elderly group showed significant adverse effects. It is suggested that elderly patients who use dexmedetomidine may benefit from a different dose. However, further research with a larger population size is required to confirm these findings.

Evaluation of the highly variable agomelatine pharmacokinetics in Chinese healthy subjects to support bioequivalence study.

OBJECTIVES: We aim to obtain the intra-subject coefficient of variability of a highly variable antidepressant agomelatine in humans, and propose an adjusted bioequivalence assessment strategy. METHODS: A single-dose, randomized crossover design was conducted in four periods (reference administered thrice, placebo administered once) separated by seven days. A validated LC-MS/MS assay was used to measure drug concentrations in serial blood samples. RESULTS: The intra-subject coefficient of variability was calculated using the residual variance of ANOVA analysis, and the results for Cmax and AUC0-t was 78.34% and 43.52%, respectively, in Chinese healthy subjects. The sample size required for standard BE study were 124(192, 340) if the expected deviation between the reference and generic products was set to 0 (5%, 10%). CONCLUSIONS: Agomelatine meets the criteria for highly variable drug in Chinese healthy male subjects, and the traditional BE criteria for agomelatine needs to be adjusted to alleviate the resource and ethical burden of using a large numbers of subjects in clinical trials. Our clinical data on the intra-subject variability of agomelatine PK in Chinese healthy population enables to adjust bioequivalence (BE) assessment approach for agomelatine based on the RSABE approaches recommended by regulatory agencies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR.org ChiCTR-TTRCC-13003835.