ABSTRACT
Myocardial noncompaction, namly isolated noncompaction of the left ventricular myocardium (NVM), is a rare congenital disease. It can be either seen in the absence of other cardiac anomalies, or associated with other congenital cardiac defects, mostly stenotic lesions of the left ventricular outflow tract. A myocardial bridge (MB) is thought being associated with coronary heart disease, such as coronary spasm, arrhythmia, and so on. The significance of MB in association with other congenital cardiac conditions is unknown.We report a novel case who was presented NVM and MB. A 34-year-old man complained of chest prickling-like pain and dizzy for 1 year. His blood pressure was 110/70 mm Hg. Echocardiograph revealed increased trabeculations below the level of papillary muscle of left ventricle (LV); deep intertrabecular recesses in the endocardial wall of LV particularly in apex free wall; and LV ejection fraction of 57%. A coronary computerized tomography scan showed that part, 38.9âcm, of left descending artery tunnel was surrounding by cardiac muscles rather than resting on top of the myocardium.The therapeutics interventions included lifestyle cares, agents of anti-ischemia and improvement myocardial cell metabolism. The patient was followed up for 2.6 years, and his general condition was stable.This case indicates that NVM can be developed with MB, and the complete diagnosis of NVM and MB should be made by different image studies.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Heart Ventricles/pathology , Isolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular Myocardium , Myocardial Bridging , Risk Reduction Behavior , Adult , Coronary Angiography/methods , Echocardiography/methods , Humans , Isolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular Myocardium/diagnosis , Isolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular Myocardium/physiopathology , Isolated Noncompaction of the Ventricular Myocardium/therapy , Male , Myocardial Bridging/diagnosis , Myocardial Bridging/physiopathology , Myocardial Bridging/psychology , Myocardial Bridging/therapy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
This study is to evaluate the effects of Simvastatin on left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular function in patients with essential hypertension. Untreated or noncompliance with drug treatment patients with simple essential hypertension were treated with a therapy on the basis of using Telmisartan to decrease blood pressure (BP). There were 237 patients who had essential hypertension combined with left ventricular hypertrophy as diagnosed by echocardiography, taken after their BPs were decreased to meet the values of the standard normal. Among them, there were only 41 out of the original 237 patients, 17.3%, who had simple essential hypertension combined with left ventricular hypertrophy without any other co-existing disease. They were the patients selected for this study. All patients were randomly, indiscriminately divided into two groups: one was the control group (Group T), treated with the Telmisartan-based monotherapy; the other was the target group (Group TS), treated with the Telmisartan-based plus simvastatin therapy. The changes of left ventricular hypertrophy and left ventricular function were rediagnosed by echocardiography after 1 year. The results we obtained from this study were as follows: (i) The average BPs at the beginning of the study, of simple essential hypertension combined with left ventricular hypertrophy, were high levels (systolic blood pressure (SBP) 189.21 ± 19.91 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure 101.40 ± 16.92 mm Hg). (ii) The Telmisartan-based plus simvastatin therapy was significantly effective in lowering the SBP (128.26 ± 9.33 mm Hg vs. 139.22 ± 16.34 mm Hg). (iii) After the 1-year treatment, the parameters of left ventricular hypertrophy in both groups were improved. Compared to group T, there were no differences in the characteristics of the subjects, including interventricular septum, left ventricular mass, left ventricular mass index, ejection fraction, left atrium inner diameter at baseline. The patients' interventricular septum (Group TS 10.30 ± 1.80 mm vs. Group T 10.99 ± 1.68 mm, P < .05), LVM (Group TS 177.43 ± 65.40 g vs. Group T 181.28 ± 65.09 g, P < .05), and LVMI (Group TS 100.97 ± 37.33 g/m(2) vs. Group T 106.54 ± 27.95 g/m(2), P < .05), all dropped more prominently (P < .05) in group TS; the ejection fraction rose more remarkably in group TS (Group TS: 57.50 ± 16.41% to 65.43 ± 11.60%, P < .01 while showing no change in Group T); the left ventricular hypertrophy reversed more significantly and the left ventricular systolic function improved more. (iv) The left atrium inner diameter of Group TS decreased (P < .01), the ratio of E/A, which indicates the left ventricular diastolic function, continued to drop further, showing no change to the trend of left ventricular diastolic function declination. Patients who have hypertension with left ventricular hypertrophy usually suffer other accompanying diseases at the same time. Telmisartan-based plus Simvastatin treatment can significantly reduce SBP, reverse left ventricular hypertrophy, improve the left ventricular systolic function, but it has no effect on reversing the left ventricular diastolic function. This experiment indicated that Simvastatin can reverse left ventricular hypertrophy and improve left systolic function.
