Multi-stage learning for segmentation of aortic dissections using a prior aortic anatomy simplification.

Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular disease with a high mortality rate. The accurate and generalized 3-D reconstruction of AD from CT-angiography can effectively assist clinical procedures and surgery plans, however, is clinically unavaliable due to the lacking of efficient tools. In this study, we presented a novel multi-stage segmentation framework for type B AD to extract true lumen (TL), false lumen (FL) and all branches (BR) as different classes. Two cascaded neural networks were used to segment the aortic trunk and branches and to separate the dual lumen, respectively. An aortic straightening method was designed based on the prior vascular anatomy of AD, simplifying the curved aortic shape before the second network. The straightening-based method achieved the mean Dice scores of 0.96, 0.95 and 0.89 for TL, FL, and BR on a multi-center dataset involving 120 patients, outperforming the end-to-end multi-class methods and the multi-stage methods without straightening on the dual-lumen segmentation, even using different network architectures. Both the global volumetric features of the aorta and the local characteristics of the primary tear could be better identified and quantified based on the straightening. Comparing to previous deep learning methods dealing with AD segmentations, the proposed framework presented advantages in segmentation accuracy.

A Three-Dimensional Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Segmentation and Diameter Measurement of Type B Aortic Dissection.

OBJECTIVE: To provide an automatic method for segmentation and diameter measurement of type B aortic dissection (TBAD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aortic computed tomography angiographic images from 139 patients with TBAD were consecutively collected. We implemented a deep learning method based on a three-dimensional (3D) deep convolutional neural (CNN) network, which realizes automatic segmentation and measurement of the entire aorta (EA), true lumen (TL), and false lumen (FL). The accuracy, stability, and measurement time were compared between deep learning and manual methods. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility of the manual method was also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean dice coefficient scores were 0.958, 0.961, and 0.932 for EA, TL, and FL, respectively. There was a linear relationship between the reference standard and measurement by the manual and deep learning method (r = 0.964 and 0.991, respectively). The average measurement error of the deep learning method was less than that of the manual method (EA, 1.64% vs. 4.13%; TL, 2.46% vs. 11.67%; FL, 2.50% vs. 8.02%). Bland-Altman plots revealed that the deviations of the diameters between the deep learning method and the reference standard were -0.042 mm (-3.412 to 3.330 mm), -0.376 mm (-3.328 to 2.577 mm), and 0.026 mm (-3.040 to 3.092 mm) for EA, TL, and FL, respectively. For the manual method, the corresponding deviations were -0.166 mm (-1.419 to 1.086 mm), -0.050 mm (-0.970 to 1.070 mm), and -0.085 mm (-1.010 to 0.084 mm). Intra- and inter-observer differences were found in measurements with the manual method, but not with the deep learning method. The measurement time with the deep learning method was markedly shorter than with the manual method (21.7 ± 1.1 vs. 82.5 ± 16.1 minutes, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The performance of efficient segmentation and diameter measurement of TBADs based on the 3D deep CNN was both accurate and stable. This method is promising for evaluating aortic morphology automatically and alleviating the workload of radiologists in the near future.