ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on anxiety and depression among patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). Methods A total of 600 CHD patients were divided into the stent group (n = 400) and the non-stent group (n = 200) according to stent implantation during coronary angiography, and 400 cases in the stent group were further divided into the intervention group (n = 200) and the non-intervention group (n = 200) according to post-stenting psychological interventions. The anxiety and depression were scored using self-rating anxiety and depression scales 1 day after admission, 1 day after PCI and at discharge from hospital, and the anxiety and depression scores were compared at different time points. Results The mean age, sex ratio, hemoglobin, total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesteroland low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were comparable among the three groups (P > 0.05). There were no significant differences among the three groups in terms of anxiety or depression scores one day after admission (P > 0.05). One day after PCI, the anxiety and depression scores were significantly higher among CHD patients in the intervention and non-intervention groups than in the non-stent group (P < 0.05), and the anxiety (t = 11.21, P < 0.01; t = 9.96, P < 0.01) and depression scores (t = 8.56, P < 0.01; t = 6.73, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the intervention and non-intervention groups one day after PCI than one day after admission. At discharge from hospital, there were significant differences among the three groups in terms of anxiety and depression scores (P < 0.05), and the anxiety (t = 21.57, P < 0.01; t = 15.77, P < 0.01) and depression scores (t = 24.33, P < 0.01; t = 15.01, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the intervention and non-intervention groups at discharge from hospital than one day after PCI, while the anxiety and depression scores were significantly lower among CHD patients in the intervention group than in the non-intervention group (P < 0.05). Conclusion The anxiety and depression are aggravated among CHD patients after PCI, and psychological interventions may alleviate the anxiety and depression.
ABSTRACT
Objective To compare the efficacy of heparin and bivalirudin in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing emergency percutaneous coronary intervention ( PCI ) .Methods A total of 90 patients with acute coronary syndrome were included in this study .They were divided into the study group and control group according to the requirements of random envelope method ,45 cases in each group .The study group received bivalirudin during PCI,the control group was given heparin .The Fbg,APTT,TT and PT were detected in the two groups ,and the inci-dence of adverse reactions ( heart failure , cardiac death , platelet reduction , hemorrhage of digestive tract ) was analyzed.Results After treatment,there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in various blood coagulation indicators (all P>0.05).The incidence rate of adverse events of the study group was 4.44％, which was significantly lower than 24.44％of the control group ,and the difference was statistically significant (χ2 =7.28,P<0.05).Conclusion Application of heparin and bivalirudin in PCI has similar efficacy ,but the safety of bivalirudin is higher ,which is worthy of clinical promotion .
