ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by SARS-CoV-2, varies with regard to symptoms and mortality rates among populations. Humoral immunity plays critical roles in SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovery from COVID-19. However, differences in immune responses and clinical features among COVID-19 patients remain largely unknown. Here, we report a database for COVID-19-specific IgG/IgM immune responses and clinical parameters (COVID-ONE humoral immune). COVID-ONE humoral immunity is based on a dataset that contains the IgG/IgM responses to 21 of 28 known SARS-CoV-2 proteins and 197 spike protein peptides against 2,360 COVID-19 samples collected from 783 patients. In addition, 96 clinical parameters for the 2,360 samples and information for the 783 patients are integrated into the database. Furthermore, COVID-ONE humoral immune provides a dashboard for defining samples and a one-click analysis pipeline for a single group or paired groups. A set of samples of interest is easily defined by adjusting the scale bars of a variety of parameters. After the "START" button is clicked, one can readily obtain a comprehensive analysis report for further interpretation. COVID-ONE-humoral immune is freely available at www.COVID-ONE.cn.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by SARS-CoV-2, varies with regard to symptoms and mortality rates among populations. Humoral immunity plays critical roles in SARS-CoV-2 infection and recovery from COVID-19. However, differences in immune responses and clinical features among COVID-19 patients remain largely unknown. Here, we report a database for COVID-19-specific IgG/IgM immune responses and clinical parameters (COVID-ONE humoral immune). COVID-ONE humoral immunity is based on a dataset that contains the IgG/IgM responses to 21 of 28 known SARS-CoV-2 proteins and 197 spike protein peptides against 2,360 COVID-19 samples collected from 783 patients. In addition, 96 clinical parameters for the 2,360 samples and information for the 783 patients are integrated into the database. Furthermore, COVID-ONE humoral immune provides a dashboard for defining samples and a one-click analysis pipeline for a single group or paired groups. A set of samples of interest is easily defined by adjusting the scale bars of a variety of parameters. After the "START" button is clicked, one can readily obtain a comprehensive analysis report for further interpretation. COVID-ONE-humoral immune is freely available at www.COVID-ONE.cn.
ABSTRACT
The immunogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 proteome is largely unknown, especially for non-structural proteins and accessory proteins. Here we collected 2,360 COVID-19 sera and 601 control sera. We analyzed these sera on a protein microarray with 20 proteins of SARS-CoV-2, built an antibody response landscape for IgG and IgM. We found that non-structural proteins and accessory proteins NSP1, NSP7, NSP8, RdRp, ORF3b and ORF9b elicit prevalent IgG responses. The IgG patterns and dynamic of non-structural/ accessory proteins are different from that of S and N protein. The IgG responses against these 6 proteins are associated with disease severity and clinical outcome and declined sharply about 20 days after symptom onset. In non-survivors, sharp decrease of IgG antibodies against S1 and N protein before death was observed. The global antibody responses to non-structural/ accessory proteins revealed here may facilitate deeper understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunology. HighlightsO_LIAn antibody response landscape against SARS-CoV-2 proteome was constructed C_LIO_LINon-structural/accessory proteins elicit prevalent antibody responses but likely through a different mechanism to that of structural proteins C_LIO_LIIgG antibodies against non-structural/accessory proteins are more associated with disease severity and clinical outcome C_LIO_LIFor non-survivors, the levels of IgG antibodies against S1 and N decline significantly before death C_LI
ABSTRACT
ImportanceAsymptomatic COVID-19 infections have a long duration of viral shedding and contribute substantially to disease transmission. However, the missing asymptomatic cases have been significantly overlooked because of imperfect sensitivity of nucleic acid testing. We aimed to investigate the humoral immunity in asymptomatics, which will help us develop serological tests and improve early identification, understand the humoral immunity to COVID-19, and provide more rational control strategies for the pandemic. ObjectiveTo better control the pandemic of COVID-19, dynamics of IgM and IgG responses to 23 proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and neutralizing antibody in asymptomatic COVID-19 infections after exposure time were investigated. Design, setting, and participants63 asymptomatic individuals were screened by RT-qPCR and ELISA for IgM and IgG from 11,776 personnel returning to work, and close contacts with the confirmed cases in different communities of Wuhan by investigation of clusters and tracing infectious sources. 63 healthy contacts with both negative results for NAT and antibodies were selected as negative controls. 51 mild patients without any preexisting conditions were also screened as controls from 1056 patients during hospitalization in Tongji Hospital. A total of 177 participants were enrolled in this study and serial serum samples (n=213) were collected. The research was conducted between 17 February 2020 and 28 April 2020. Serum IgM and IgG profiles of 177 participants were further probed using a SARS-CoV-2 proteome microarray. Neutralizing antibody responses in different population were detected by a pseudotyped virus neutralization assay system. The dynamics of IgM and IgG antibodies and neutralizing antibodies were analyzed with exposure time or symptoms onset. ResultsAsymptomatics were classified into four subgroups based on NAT and serological tests. In particular, only 19% had positive NAT results while approximately 81% detected positive IgM/IgG responses. Comparative SARS-CoV-2 proteome microarray further demonstrated that there was a significantly difference of antibody dynamics responding to S1 or N proteins among three populations, although IgM and IgG profiles could not be used to differentiate them. S1 specific IgM responses were elicited in asymptomatic individuals as early to the seventh day after exposure and peaked on days from 17d to 25d, which might be used as an early diagnostic biomarker and give an additional 36.5% seropositivity. Mild patients produced stronger both S1 specific IgM and neutralizing antibody responses than asymptomatic individuals. Most importantly, S1 specific IgM/IgG responses and the titers of neutralizing antibody in asymptomatic individuals gradually vanished in two months. Conclusions and relevanceOur findings might have important implications for the definition of asymptomatic COVID-19 infections, diagnosis, serological survey, public health and immunization strategies.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the clinical significance of preoperative colonoscopy for patients with benign anal diseases,and to compare the success rates of examination done by sedated colonoscopy and conventional colonoscopy.Methods The clinical data of 333 patients with benign anal disease who received preoperative colonoscopy at the Six Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University from April 2010 to March 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.All the patients were divided into the lesion group (120 patients) and normal group (213 patients)according to the results of colonoscopy.The measurement data and count data were analyzed using the t test and chi-square test,respectively.Results The age of patients in the lesion group was (48 ± 14) years,which was significantly older than (42 ± 14) years (t =3.75,P ＜ 0.05).The constituent ratio of patients older than 40 years in the lesion group was 72.50％ (87/120),which was significantly higher than 39.44％ (84/213) in the normal group (x2=33.59,P ＜0.05).The proportions of male and female patients were 71.67％ (86/120) and 28.33％ (34/120) in the lesion group,and 62.44％ (133/213) and 37.56％ (80/213) in the normal group,with no significant difference between the 2 groups (x2 =2.90,P ＞ 0.05).The benign anal diseases in the lesion group included polyp (80 cases),enteritis (30 cases),malignant tumor (7 cases),infflammatory bowel disease (7 cases),diverticulum (5 cases) and ulcer (1 case).The application rates of sedated colonoscopy in the lesion group and the normal goup were 51.67％ (62/120) and 54.93％ (117/213),respectively,with no significant difference between the 2 groups (x2=0.33,P ＞0.05).The success rate of terminal ileum intubation was 99.44％ (178/179) in patients who received sedated colonoscopy,which was significantly higher than 95.45％ (147/154) of patients who received conventional colonoscopy (x2 =5.61,P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Patients with benign anal disease might complicated with colorectal lesions,and sedated colonoscopy is recommended for preoperative diagnosis,especially for patients who are older than 40 years.
