ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between MRI findings and histological features for preoperative prediction of histological grading and Ki-67 expression level in alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 63 ASPS patients (Jan 2017-May 2023). All patients underwent 3.0-T MRI examinations, including conventional sequences, dynamic contrast-enhanced scans with time-intensity curve analysis, and diffusion-weighted imaging with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements. Patients were divided into low-grade (histological Grade I) and high-grade (histological Grade II/III) groups based on pathology. Immunohistochemistry was used to assess Ki-67 expression levels in ASPS. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, binary logistic regression analysis, Spearman correlation analysis, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of various observational data. RESULTS: There were 29 low-grade and 34 high-grade patients (26 males and 37 females) and a wide age range (5-68 years). Distant metastasis, tumor enhancement characteristics, and ADC values were independent predictors of high-grade ASPS. High-grade ASPS had lower ADC values (p = 0.002), with an area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of 0.723, 79.4%, and 58.6%, respectively, for high-grade prediction. There was a negative correlation between ADC values and Ki-67 expression (r = -0.526; p < 0.001). When the cut-off value of ADC was 0.997 × 10-3 mm²/s, the AUC, sensitivity, and specificity for predicting high Ki-67 expression were 0.805, 65.6%, and 83.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Qualitative and quantitative MRI parameters are valuable for predicting histological grading and Ki-67 expression levels in ASPS. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This study will help provide a more nuanced understanding of ASPS and guide personalized treatment strategies. KEY POINTS: There is limited research on assessing ASPS prognosis through MRI. Metastasis, enhancement, and ADC correlated with histological grade; ADC related to Ki-67 expression. MRI provides clinicians with valuable information on ASPS grading and proliferation activity.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the current status of interruption events in nursing document writing in the intensive care unit (ICU) using a cross-sectional survey. Methods: Between May and October 2021, the convenience sampling method was used to observe the interruption events in nursing document writing in the ICU. A total of 54 nurses and 7 indicators were observed: the start time, end time, interruption period, source, type, duration and outcome of interruption events. Results: A total of 438 interruption events in nursing document writing occurred in 85.955 hours, with a frequency of 5.093 times/hour and a duration of 4787.00 (1152.00, 13,109.00) seconds. The frequency of interruption events in nursing document writing was the highest (11 times/hour) and the duration was the longest (9581.50 seconds) from 08:00 to 12:00. The main sources of interruptions for nurses with 10 or more years of service or with the professional title of nurse are nurses themselves and their colleagues. The main sources of interruptions for nurses who have been in charge for 10 years or over are the working environment and doctors. This intervention in work continuity occurs unexpectedly; however, if adjustments are made to nursing procedures, the interruption can be terminated rapidly or adverse consequences can be avoided. Years of working experience, seniority level, interruption time periods and professional titles were independent factors influencing the number of interruption events, and they were all positively correlated. The results of this study show that there were statistically significant differences in the incidence of negative outcomes among ICU nurses with varying years of working experience and professional titles. Conclusion: Interruptions in nursing document writing have high frequency, complex sources and multiple types. For senior nurses, the outcome was predominantly positive, while for junior nurses, it was predominantly negative.
