ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on resistant hypertension in patients at high risk with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) needs further investigation. We aimed to determine the effect of CPAP on blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension and OSA. Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and CMB were searched. Data were pooled using a random-effects or fixed-effects model to derive weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RECENT FINDINGS: A total of 12 trials and 718 participants were included. Compared with control, CPAP significantly reduced 24-h systolic blood pressure (SBP) (WMD: - 5.92 mmHg [ - 8.72, - 3.11]; Pï¼0.001), 24-h diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD: - 4.44 mmHg [- 6.26 , - 2.62]; P ï¼0.001), daytime SBP (WMD: - 5.76 mmHg [ - 9.16, - 2.36]; P ï¼0.001), daytime DBP (WMD: - 3.92 mmHg [- 5.55, - 2.30]; nighttime SBP (WMD: - 4.87 mmHg [ - 7.96 , - 1.78]; P = 0.002), and nighttime DBP (WMD: - 2.05 mmHg [- 2.99, - 1.11]; Pï¼0.001) in patients with resistant hypertension and OSA. CPAP improved the blood pressure both in the short (ï¼3 months) and long term (≥ 3 months). No significant impact on mean heart rate was noted (WMD: -2.76 beats per min [- 7.50, 1.97]; P = 0.25). CPAP treatment was associated with BP reduction in patients with resistant hypertension and OSA.
Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure , Hypertension , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/therapy , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Continuous Positive Airway Pressure/methods , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypertension/therapy , Blood Pressure/physiology , Treatment Outcome , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Objective: The effect of oxygen therapy on the prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with nocturnal hypoxemia (NOD) has been controversial. Therefore, this study systematically evaluated the relevant literature and included it into randomized controlled studies for meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and prognosis. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, web of science, Cochrane, China HowNet and Wanfang database for the literature on the prognosis of COPD patients with simple NOD from the establishment of the database to 30 June 2022. The outcome indicators were death and aggravation of the disease. The efficacy evaluation measures were pulmonary function and arterial blood gas results. The publication bias and heterogeneity of the included studies were evaluated. Results: A total of 621 patients from 5 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and there was no publication bias in the included studies. The total mortality of long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in COPD patients with simple NOD in oxygen therapy group (RR = 1.04; 95% CI: 0.81-1.33, p = 0.77), mortality (RR = 0.87; 95% CI: 0.58-1.31, p = 0.50), risk of progression to LTOT events (RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.76-1.51, p = 0.71). PaO2 in patients with COPD and simple NOD in oxygen therapy group was higher than that in non-oxygen therapy group (mean difference (MD) = 13.47; 95% CI: 3.49-23.46, p = 0.008), the decrease of PaCO2 level was not statistically significant (MD = -10.05; 95% CI: -26.36-6.27, p = 0.23). Conclusion: Oxygen therapy can improve the prognosis of blood oxygen partial pressure in COPD patients with simple NOD, but oxygen therapy has no significant effect on the survival rate, controlling the progression of the disease to LTOT and reducing the partial pressure of carbon dioxide.
