Total knee arthroplasty following lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy versus primary total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: The disparity in patient-reported outcomes between total knee arthroplasty (TKA) following high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and primary TKA has yet to be fully comprehended. This study aims to compare the patient-reported outcomes, radiological parameters and complication rates between TKA following HTO and primary TKA. METHODS: Sixty-five patients who underwent TKA following lateral closing-wedge HTO were compared to a matched group of primary TKA at postoperative 6-months and 1-year. Between-group confounders of age, gender, smoking status, Body Mass index, preoperative Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain in rest, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Physical function Shortform (KOOS-PS), EuroQol five-dimensional (EQ-5D) overall health score, and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were balanced by propensity score matching. Patient-reported outcome measures were NRS pain in rest, KOOS-PS, EQ-5D overall health score, and OKS. Radiological parameters were femorotibial angle, medial proximal tibial angle, anatomical lateral distal femoral angle, posterior tibial slope, and patellar height assessed by Insall-Salvati ratio. The complication rates of TKA were compared between the two groups. The HTO survival time, the choice of staple removal before or during TKA in patients who underwent TKA following HTO patients, and the rate of patellar resurfacing were assessed. The p value < 0.0125 indicates statistical significance after Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, no significant between-group differences in the patient-reported outcome measures, radiographical parameters and complication rates were found (p > 0.0125). In the TKA following HTO group, with an average HTO survival time of 8.7 years, staples were removed before TKA in 46 patients (71%) and during TKA in 19 patients, and 11 cases (17%) had patella resurfacing. In the primary TKA group, 15 cases (23%) had patella resurfacing. CONCLUSION: The short-term assessment of TKA following HTO indicates outcomes similar to primary TKA. A previous HTO does not impact the early results of subsequent TKA, suggesting that the previous HTO has minimal influence on TKA outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, cohort study.

Joint line obliquity after lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy does not adversely affect clinical and radiological outcome: a 5-year follow-up study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the association between change in knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) and patient-reported outcome, radiological progression of osteoarthritis, and surgical survival after lateral closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO). METHODS: A cohort of 180 patients treated in one single hospital with lateral closing-wedge HTO was examined. KJLO was defined by the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA). To assess the association between KJLO and patient-reported outcome, radiological progression of osteoarthritis, and surgical survival, patient groups were defined: I, postoperative MPTA < 95.0°; II, postoperative MPTA ≥ 95.0°; A, MPTA change < 8.0°; B, MPTA change ≥ 8.0°. Propensity score matching was used for between-groups (I and II, A and B) covariates matching, including age, gender, preoperative lower limb alignment, preoperative medial joint space width (mJSW), preoperative Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, wedge size, and postoperative follow-up time. Patient-reported outcome was assessed by the WOMAC questionnaire, radiological progression of osteoarthritis by mJSW and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade progression (≥ 1) preoperatively and at follow-ups (> 2 years). Failure was defined as revision HTO or conversion to knee arthroplasty. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, groups I and II contained 58 pairs of patients and groups A and B contained 50 pairs. There were no significant differences in postoperative WOMAC score or surgical failure rate between groups I and II or between groups A and B (p > 0.05). However, the postoperative mJSW was significantly lower in group I than group II (3.2 ± 1.6 mm vs 3.9 ± 1.8 mm; p = 0.018) and in group A than group B (3.0 ± 1.7 mm vs 3.7 ± 1.5 mm; p = 0.040). KL grade progression rate was significantly higher in group I than group II (53.4% vs 29.3%; p = 0.008) and in group A than group B (56.0% vs 28.0%; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Increased KJLO (postoperative MPTA ≥ 95.0°) or MPTA change ≥ 8.0° after lateral closing-wedge HTO does not adversely affect patient-reported outcome, radiological progression of osteoarthritis, or surgical survival at an average 5-year follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective cohort study.

Clinical relevance of joint line obliquity after high tibial osteotomy for medial knee osteoarthritis remains controversial: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To systematically review the literature on the association between knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) and clinical outcome after high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial knee osteoarthritis and summarize the KJLO cut-off value used when studying this association. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in three databases (PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science) on September 2022, updated on February 2023. Eligible studies describing postoperative KJLO in relation to clinical outcome after HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis were included. Nonpatient studies and conference abstracts without full-text were excluded. Two independent reviewers assessed title, abstract and full-text based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The modified Downs and Black checklist was used to assess the methodological quality of each included study. RESULTS: Of the seventeen studies included, three had good methodological quality, thirteen fair quality, and one had poor quality. Conflicting findings were shown on the associations between postoperative KJLO and patient-reported outcome, medial knee cartilage regeneration, and 10-year surgical survival in sixteen studies. Three good-quality studies found no significant differences in lateral knee cartilage degeneration between postoperative medial proximal tibial angle > 95° and < 95°. Joint line orientation angles by the tibial plateau of 4° and 6°, joint line orientation angle by the middle knee joint space of 5°, medial proximal tibial angles of 95° and 98°, and Mikulicz joint line angle of 94° were KJLO cut-off values used in the included studies. CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence, the actual association between postoperative KJLO and clinical consequences after HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis cannot be ascertained. The clinical relevance of KJLO after HTO remains controversial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Assessment of joint line obliquity and its related frontal deformity using long-standing radiographs.

Purpose: To investigate how radiographic techniques and osteoarthritis grade influence measurements of knee joint line obliquity (KJLO) and KJLO-related frontal deformity, and to propose preferable KJLO measurement methods. Methods: Forty patients with symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis indicated for high tibial osteotomy were assessed. Measurements were compared between single-leg and double-leg standing radiographs for KJLO measurement methods including joint line orientation angle by femoral condyles (JLOAF), joint line orientation angle by middle knee joint space (JLOAM), joint line orientation angle by tibial plateau (JLOAT), Mikulicz joint line angle (MJLA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), as well as KJLO-related frontal deformity parameters including joint line convergence angle (JLCA), knee ankle joint angle (KAJA) and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA). Influences of bipedal distance in double-leg standing and osteoarthritis grade on the above measurements were analysed. Measurement reliability was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient. Results: From single-leg to double-leg standing radiographs MPTA and KAJA did not change significantly, whereas the other measurements showed significant changes: JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT decreased 0.88°, 1.24° and 1.77°, MJLA and JLCA decreased 0.63° and 0.85°, and HKA increased 1.11° (p < 0.05). Bipedal distance in double-leg standing radiographs moderately correlated with JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT (rp = -0.555, -0.574 and -0.549). Osteoarthritis grade moderately correlated with JLCA in single-leg and double-leg standing radiographs (rs = 0.518 and 0.471). All measurements had at least good reliability. Conclusion: In long-standing radiographs, measurements of JLOAF, JLOAM, JLOAT, MJLA, JLCA and HKA are all influenced by single-leg/double-leg standing; JLOAF, JLOAM and JLOAT are also affected by bipedal distance in double-leg standing; and JLCA is affected by osteoarthritis grade. Knee joint obliquity as assessed by MPTA measurement is independent of single-leg/double-leg standing, bipedal distance or osteoarthritis grade, and has excellent measurement reliability. We therefore propose MPTA as the preferable KJLO measurement method for clinical practice and future research. Level of evidence: III, cross-sectional study.

Hospitalized pain patients have recently doubled: a retrospective case series study in Shenzhen Nanshan People's Hospital of China.

AIM: To study the characteristics of hospitalized pain patients in Shenzhen with the aim of identifying some of the social, economic and therapeutic aspects of pain management in China. METHODS: A retrospective study was designed to collect the information of 3061 hospitalized pain patients in 2003, 2007 and 2011. Their demographic characteristics, diagnoses of pain types, hospitalization, therapeutic effect, economic cost and payment types were analyzed. RESULTS: The number of female patients significantly increased with time. The patient's average age increased from 41.3 in 2003 to 49.7 years old in 2011. The most common diagnosis of pain was lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. The total hospitalization days of each patient per year significantly decreased from 15.7 days in 2003 to 10.4 days in 2011. However, the hospitalization cost for each patient was almost doubled. CONCLUSION: The hospitalized pain patients and their economic burdens have almost been doubled in the recent four years.