Repeat hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: retrospective multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic value of repeat hepatic resection (rHR) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of rHR or RFA. METHODS: This was a retrospective multicentre study of patients with recurrent HCC within the Milan criteria who underwent rHR or RFA at nine university hospitals in China and Italy between January 2003 and January 2018. Survival after rHR or RFA was examined in unadjusted analyses and after propensity score matching (1 : 1). RESULTS: Of 847 patients included, 307 and 540 underwent rHR and RFA respectively. Median overall survival was 73.5 and 67.0 months after rHR and RFA respectively (hazard ratio 1.01 (95 per cent c.i. 0.81 to 1.26)). Median recurrence-free survival was longer after rHR versus RFA (23.6 versus 15.2 months; hazard ratio 0.76 (95 per cent c.i. 0.65 to 0.89)). These results were confirmed after propensity score matching. RFA was associated with lower morbidity of grade 3 and above (0.6 versus 6.2 per cent; P < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (8.0 versus 3.0 days, P < 0.001) than rHR. CONCLUSION: rHR was associated with longer recurrence-free survival but not overall survival compared with RFA.

[Comparative study on prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hepatic surgery versus upfront surgery in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastasis].

Objective: To compare the survival outcome in patients with synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by hepatic surgery versus upfront surgery strategies. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was carried out. Data of patients undergoing surgery at the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery Unit I of Peking University Cancer Hospital from January 2008 to December 2018 for initially resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastasis were retrospectively collected. A total of 282 cases were enrolled, including 244 in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, 38 in the upfront surgery first group. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups were compared. A propensity score risk adjustment was used to eliminate potential bias between groups, and the covariates including sex, age, location of primary tumor, T stage, clinical risk score (CRS), RAS gene status, adjuvant chemotherapy, and resection margin status were included for adjustment. Results: In the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, 244 cases received 4 (1-15) cycles of chemotherapy before hepatic resection, among whom 207 cases received oxaliplatin-based regimens, 37 cases received irinotecan-based regimens, and 90 cases received combined targeted agents in the first line treatment. The median follow-up time was 30 (5-134) months, and loss of follow-up was 1%. Before adjustment, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 1-year and 3-year OS rates in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (95.1% and 66.4%) were better than those in the upfront surgery first group (94.7% and 51.5%, P=0.026); 1-year and 3-year PFS rates in neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (51.0% and 23.4%) were also better than those in surgery first group (39.5% and 11.5%, P=0.039). After propensity score risk adjustment, Cox multivariate analysis indicated that neoadjuvant chemotherapy was an independent protective factor of PFS (HR=0.664, 95% CI: 0.449-0.982, P=0.040), however, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not an independent protective factor of OS (HR=0.651, 95% CI: 0.393-1.079, P=0.096). Subgroup analysis showed that the 1-year and 3-year OS rates in the patients with response to the first line treatment (194, including complete remission, partial remission and reduction but not partial remission) (96.9% and 67.1%) were better than those in the upfront surgery group (94.7% and 51.5%, P=0.026) after adjustment. However, the 1-year and 3-year OS rates in the patients without response to the first line treatment (50, including tumor progression or enlargement) were 90.0% and 63.3%, respectively, which were not significantly different with 94.7% and 51.5% in the upfront surgery group (P=0.310) after adjustment. Conclusions: For patients with resectable synchronous colorectal cancer liver metastasis, liver resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy can provide longer PFS than upfront surgery. Although the whole OS benefit is not significant, patients with effective neoadjuvant first-line chemotherapy have better OS than those undergoing upfront surgery.

[Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing hepatectomy for bilateral multiple colorectal liver metastases-a propensity score matching analysis].

Objective: Liver is the most common site of distant metastasis in colorectal cancer patients. Currently, surgical resection of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) still remains the most curative therapeutic option which is associated with long-term survival. However, the outcome of CRLM patients with bilobar multiple lesions has been reported to be extremely poor due to the complex techniques of the surgery and the difficulties to achieve a negative resection margin. In this study, postoperative long-term outcome in patients with bilobar versus unilobar multiple CRLM undergoing surgical resection were compared and the prognostic factors of CRLM were analyzed. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed. The clinicopathological data were collected retrospectively from patients with multiple CRLM who received liver resection between January 2002 and November 2018 at our department. Inclusion criteria: (1) All CRLM lesions were confirmed by preoperative enhanced CT or MRI and enhanced ultrasonography. (2) All CRLM lesions were resectable either initially or converted by systemic treatments. The CRLM patients were considered as resectable, if their extrahepatic diseases were able to be completely removed. (3) Sufficient remnant liver volume was required to maintain normal liver function, which was defined by the ratio of remnant liver volume to total liver volume (RLV-TLV), of greater than 30% in general or 40% for the patients undergoing chemotherapy. (4) Medical records and follow-up information were intact. Those undergoing multiple operations after recurrence, with R2 resection, or with a single CRLM lesion were excluded. Patients were divided into bilobar and unilobar group according to tumor distribution. One-to-one propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the covariates between the bilobar group and unilobar group. After PSM, the differences in long-term outcomes between the two groups were compared. Results: A total of 491 patients met the inclusion criteria, 344 (69.6%) with bilobar and 147 (30.4%) with unilobar CRLM. In the propensity-score-matched population (bilobar, 143; unilobar, 143), baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates in the bilobar group were 91.6%, 52.1%, and 35.3% respectively, compared with 93.7%, 56.8%, and 43.8% in the unilobar group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.204). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates in the bilobar group were 45.7%, 33.7%, and 33.7% respectively, compared with 62.5%, 44.1%, and 42.1% in the unilobar group, and the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.075). No significant difference was found in liver-only recurrence (45.6% in bilobar vs. 53.3% in unilobar, P=0.543). Univariate analysis showed that N stage of primary tumor, diameter of the largest liver metastases, carcinoembyonic antigen level, RAS gene status and clinical risk score (CRS) were significantly associated with the prognosis of CRLM (all P<0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated that diameter of largest liver metastases > 5 cm (HR=1.888, 95% CI: 1.251-2.848, P=0.002), CRS≥3 (HR=1.552,95% CI:1.050-2.294, P=0.027) and RAS gene mutation (HR=1.561, 95% CI: 1.102-2.212, P=0.012) were independent risk factors of poor overall survival after hepatectomy. Conclusions: Tumor distribution may not affect the prognosis of multiple CRLM after resection. Surgical removal in patients with bilobar multiple CRLM provides comparable long-term survival to unilobar multiple CRLM.

[Perioperative chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastasis].

The incidence of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) increased gradually in recent years. Surgical resection is the most important treatment for CRLM patients to obtain long-term survival, with a 5-year survival rate of about 50%. However, only 20% of the CRLM patients are initially resectable. The recurrence rate after surgery is more than 70%. Perioperative chemotherapy has been widely used with the development of effective chemotherapy regimens and targeted therapies. For patients with initially resectable liver metastases, perioperative chemotherapy may help reduce recurrence and prolong survival. For patients with unresectable liver metastases, conversion chemotherapy with high efficiency provides opportunity for radical resection. However, CRLM is a disease with high heterogeneity and with many factors influencing prognosis, and there is a lack of large-scale prospective clinical trial evidence in many problems. Hence there are still many controversies in the clinical practice of perioperative chemotherapy, including whether chemotherapy alone is the best preoperative treatment for resectable CRLM, whether preoperative chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy is superior to chemotherapy alone, who can benefit most from preoperative chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy, who are the exact patients suitable for conversion therapy, how to choose the best first-line conversion therapy. Here we discuss the current status of research on perioperative chemotherapy in three aspects: neoadjuvant chemotherapy, conversion therapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. We also emphasized the importance of multidisciplinary team during the treatment process to give patients individualized therapy considering their specific conditions.

[Rethinking of the conversion therapy in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastasis].

The incidence of colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) has gradually increased in recent years. Surgical resection is the main method to achieve long-term survival for patients with CRLM. However, only 20% of these patients have the chance to undergo surgical resection. If the unresectable metastases can be converted to resectable ones by effective conversion therapy, the 5-year survival rate of patients received liver resection can exceed to 30%, which is significantly better than palliative treatment. Therefore, for patients who are initially unresectable, rationally developing a conversion therapy strategy to convert the initial unresectable CRLM into resectable ones is the key to improve the long-term survival of CRLM patients. However, there are still many controversies in clinical practice. In this article, we discuss three critical issues related to the conversion therapy for CRLM based on previous related researches and our experience, including the applicable population of conversion therapy, how to choose a conversion regime and the recognition and treatment of disappeared lesions after chemotherapy.

[Association between A-kinase anchor proteins 12 methylation and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma].

Objective: To study the association between the AKAP12 promoter methylation and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: A total of 142 primary liver cancer patients underwent surgery in department of Hepatobiliary surgery in Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2003 to 2009 were selected as subjects in the survey; with the inclusion criteria as hepatocellular carcinoma, no cancer cells were observed in the surgical margin(SM) samples. All patients had neither lymph nor distant metastasis at the time of surgery, and receiving complete follow-up data for at least 3 years. By the end of May 2014, a total of 75 patients had relapsed of whom 71 died and there were no lost. All samples were acquired from the frozen surgical tissues. Genomic DNA was extracted using phenol/chloroform method and performed bisulfite modification following with polymerase chain reaction (PCR). AKAP12 methylation in hepatoma and the corresponding SM samples from 142 patients was determined by denature high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) and bisulfite clone sequencing. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportion hazard regression model were used to identify the factors related to the survival time. Results: In 142 cases, 125 patients (88.0%) were male and 17 (12.0%) cases were female. The median age was 52.5 years, ranging from 34 years to 76 years. AKAP12 methylation-positive rate was significantly higher in hepatomas than SMs (54.9% vs. 10.2%, P<0.001). Patients with AKAP12 methylation-positive had less risk of the recurrence (HR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-0.99); with tumor diameter more than 5 cm (HR=1.53, 95%CI: 1.00-2.50),portal vein invasion(HR=4.53, 95% CI:2.69-7.64) increased the recurrence risk. Moreover, portal vein invasion had a higher risk of death (HR=2.98, 95% CI: 1.73-4.98). Conclusion: There was significant association between AKAP12 DNA methylation and low risk of recurrence and long progression-free survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients.

[The effect of estrogen receptor level on the prognosis of the elderly breast cancer patients].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of estrogen receptor (ER) on the prognosis of the elderly female breast cancer patients and the guidance for their post-operation therapy. METHODS: 134 cases of the elderly female breast cancer patients (> or = 60 year-old) were divided into two groups depending on their ER level. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease-free servival (DFS) rate from the date of surgery. RESULTS: There were 88 patients in ER (+) group and 46 patients in ER (-) group. The medium follow-up of the ER (+) and the ER (-) group was 92.5 and 85.5 months, respectively. The incidence of recurrence and metastasis was 20.5% (18/88) in the ER (+) group and 41.3% (19/46) in the ER (-) group (P < 0.02). CONCLUSION: Estrogen receptor is a reference factor to predict prognosis of breast cancer in elderly patients.