The performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective comparison with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the performance of 68Ga-FAPI-04 and 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging and recurrence detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS: Prospectively, 77 patients with histologically proven or highly suspected HNSCC underwent paired 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT in a week for either initial staging (n = 67) or restaging (n = 10). The diagnostic performance was compared for the two imaging approaches, especially for N staging. SUVmax, SUVmean, and target-to-background ratio (TBR) were assessed for paired positive lesions. Furthermore, change in management by 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT and histopathologic FAP expression of some lesions were explored. RESULTS: 18F-FDG and 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT exhibited a comparable detection efficiency for primary tumor (100%) and recurrence (62.5%). In the twenty-nine patients receiving neck dissection, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT showed greater specificity and accuracy in evaluating preoperative N staging than 18F-FDG based on patient (p = 0.031 and p = 0.070), neck side (p = 0.002 and p = 0.006), and neck level (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). As for distant metastasis, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT detected more positive lesions than 18F-FDG (25 vs 23) and with higher SUVmax (7.99 ± 9.04 vs 3.62 ± 2.68, p = 0.002) by lesion-based analysis. The type of neck dissection in 9 cases (9/33) was altered by 68Ga-FAPI-04. Overall, clinical management was significantly changed in 10 patients (10/61). Three patients had a follow-up 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT post neoadjuvant therapy: One showed complete remission, and the others showed progression. The 68Ga-FAPI-04 uptake intensity was confirmed to be consistent with FAP expression. CONCLUSION: 68Ga-FAPI-04 outperforms 18F-FDG PET/CT in evaluating preoperative N staging in patients with HNSCC. Furthermore, 68Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT also shows the potential in clinical management and monitoring response to treatment.

Usefulness of [68Ga]FAPI-04 and [18F]FDG PET/CT for the detection of primary tumour and metastatic lesions in gastrointestinal carcinoma: a comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare the diagnostic performance of gallium-68-labelled fibroblast activation protein inhibitor ([68Ga]FAPI-04) and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose ([18F]FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: Fifty-one patients who underwent both [18F]FDG and [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT for initial staging or restaging were enrolled. Histopathological findings, typical radiological appearances, and clinical imaging follow-up were used as the reference standard. The diagnostic performance of the two tracers was calculated and compared. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax), mean SUV (SUVmean), tumour-to-mediastinal blood pool ratio (TBR), and tumour-to-liver ratio (TLR) of primary and metastatic lesions were measured and compared between two imaging modalities. RESULTS: In patient-based analysis, [68Ga]FAPI-04 showed much better diagnostic sensitivity than [18F]FDG in detecting primary tumour (94.44% [17/18] vs. 61.11% [11/18]), postoperative recurrence and metastases (95.65% [22/23] vs. 69.57% [16/23]), and peritoneal carcinomatosis (100% [28/28] vs. 60.71% [17/28]) (all p < 0.05). In lesion-based analysis, [68Ga]FAPI-04 showed higher sensitivity than [18F]FDG for detecting lymph node metastases. In peritoneal carcinomatosis, the median SUVmax (12.12 vs. 7.18) and SUVmean (6.84 vs. 4.11) with [68Ga]FAPI-04 were significantly higher than those with [18F]FDG (all p < 0.005). The TBR and TLR of [68Ga]FAPI-04 were significantly higher than those of [18F]FDG for detecting primary tumour, lymph node, liver, and peritoneal metastases (all p < 0.005). Therapeutic management changed in 13 patients according to [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT compared with conventional imaging. CONCLUSIONS: [68Ga]FAPI-04 is superior to [18F]FDG PET/CT for detecting primary tumour, postoperative recurrence and metastasis, and peritoneal carcinomatosis in gastrointestinal cancer. KEY POINTS: • [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT showed significantly higher sensitivity than [18F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of primary tumour and postoperative recurrence and metastasis in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoma. • [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT had obvious advantages over [18F]FDG PET/CT in the detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastrointestinal carcinoma with a much higher FAPI uptake value, TBR, and TLR. • Although the median SUVmax and SUVmean of [68Ga]FAPI-04 were similar to those of [18F]FDG for the primary tumour, lymph node metastases, and liver metastases in gastrointestinal carcinoma, the TBR and TLR of the SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly higher on [68Ga]FAPI-04 PET/CT, causing the lesions to be displayed more clearly.