Molecular subtypes predict the preferential site of distant metastasis in advanced breast cancer: a nationwide retrospective study.

Objective: This study aimed to explore possible associations between molecular subtypes and site of distant metastasis in advanced breast cancer (ABC). Methods: 3577 ABC patients were selected from 21 hospitals of seven geographic regions in China from 2012-2014. A questionnaire was designed to collect medical information regarding demographic characteristics, risk factors, molecular subtype, recurrence/metastasis information, and disease-free survival (DFS). The cancers were classified into Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and Triple Negative subtypes. Chi-square test and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were performed to explore the associations between molecular subtypes and distant metastasis sites. Results: A total of 2393 cases with molecular subtypes information were finally examined. Patients with Luminal A (51.1%) and Luminal B (44.7%) were most prone to bone metastasis, whereas liver metastasis was more frequently observed in HER2-enriched ABC patients (29.1%).The cumulative recurrence and metastasis rates of ABC patients at 36 months of DFS were the most significant within molecular types, of which Triple Negative was the highest (82.7%), while that of Luminal A was the lowest (58.4%). In the adjusted Cox regression analysis, Luminal B, HER2-enriched and Triple Negative subtypes increased the risk of visceral metastasis by 23%, 46% and 87% respectively. In addition, Triple Negative patients had a higher probability of brain metastasis (HR 3.07, 95% CI: 1.04-9.07). Conclusion: Molecular subtypes can predict the preferential sites of distant metastasis, emphasizing that these associations were of great help in choices for surveillance, developing appropriate screening and cancer management strategies for follow-up and personalized therapy in ABC patients.

Prognostic factors and adjuvant systemic therapy for patients with HER2-positive T1N0 breast cancer: evidence from a real-world study with long-term follow-up.

PURPOSE: The optimal adjuvant systemic treatment and potential prognostic factors for patients with T1N0 HER2-positive breast cancer are still unclear. We conducted a real-world study in this relatively low-risk population to identify the clinical-pathological factors of potential prognostic value and to compare the efficacy of different adjuvant strategies. METHODS: We included patients with HER2-positive T1N0 breast cancer of infiltrating ductal carcinoma (IDC) histology treated at the Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from April 2010 to April 2017. We performed Cox multivariate analysis to identify the potential prognostic factors for invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). We also compared survival outcomes of (1) patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy alone, or chemotherapy plus trastuzumab, or observation; (2) patients receiving adjuvant anthracycline-based and non-anthracycline regimens, both combined with trastuzumab. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity score was used to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: Overall, 692 consecutive patients were included, with a median follow-up of 78.0 months for IDFS. Age ≤ 40, T1c, ER + PR + , and adjuvant trastuzumab were identified as independent prognostic factors. For adjuvant treatment, compared with observation and chemotherapy alone, chemotherapy plus trastuzumab could significantly benefit patients (HR = 2.70, P = 0.034; HR = 3.95, P < 0.001). Meanwhile, compared with observation, chemotherapy alone did not significantly benefit patients (HR = 1.37, P = 0.424). For the comparison of anthracycline-based versus non-anthracycline regimens when combined with trastuzumab, patients in both groups had similar IDFS (HR = 1.74, P = 0.242). CONCLUSIONS: HER2-positive T1N0 IDC patients could benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab. Age ≤ 40, T1c, ER + PR + , and adjuvant trastuzumab are independent prognostic factors for this population.

Assessing early changes in plasma HER2 levels is useful for predicting therapeutic response in advanced breast cancer: A multicenter, prospective, noninterventional clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Early prediction of treatment response is crucial for the optimal treatment of advanced breast cancer. We aimed to explore whether monitoring early changes in plasma human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) levels using digital PCR (dPCR) could predict the treatment response in advanced breast cancer. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, noninterventional clinical study of patients with advanced breast cancer. All enrolled patients underwent blood testing to measure the HER2 levels by digital PCR before treatment initiation and once every 3 weeks during the study. The primary endpoints werea the diagnostic value of dPCR for detecting HER2 status in the blood andb the relevance of potential changes in the plasma HER2 level at 3 weeks from baseline for predicting treatment response. RESULTS: Overall, 85 patients were enrolled between October 9, 2018, and January 23, 2020. dPCR had a specificity of 91.67% (95% CI: 80.61% to 97.43%) for detecting HER2 amplification, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.84 (p < 0.01). A clinically relevant specificity threshold of approximately 90%, which was equivalent to a ≥15% decrease in the plasma HER2 ratio at 3 weeks from baseline, showed a positive predictive value of 97.37% (95% CI: 77.11% to 98.65%) in terms of predicting clinical benefit. Patients whose plasma HER2 ratio was reduced by ≥15% had a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) than those whose ratio was reduced by <15% (9.20 months vs. 4.50 months, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Early changes in the plasma HER2 ratio may predict the treatment response in patients with advanced breast cancer and could facilitate optimal treatment selection.

Expression dynamics of periodic transcripts during cancer cell cycle progression and their correlation with anticancer drug sensitivity.

BACKGROUND: The cell cycle is at the center of cellular activities and is orchestrated by complex regulatory mechanisms, among which transcriptional regulation is one of the most important components. Alternative splicing dramatically expands the regulatory network by producing transcript isoforms of genes to exquisitely control the cell cycle. However, the patterns of transcript isoform expression in the cell cycle are unclear. Therapies targeting cell cycle checkpoints are commonly used as anticancer therapies, but none of them have been designed or evaluated at the alternative splicing transcript level. The utility of these transcripts as markers of cell cycle-related drug sensitivity is still unknown, and studies on the expression patterns of cell cycle-targeting drug-related transcripts are also rare. METHODS: To explore alternative splicing patterns during cell cycle progression, we performed sequential transcriptomic assays following cell cycle synchronization in colon cancer HCT116 and breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cell lines, using flow cytometry and reference cell cycle transcripts to confirm the cell cycle phases of samples, and we developed a new algorithm to describe the periodic patterns of transcripts fluctuating during the cell cycle. Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer (GDSC) drug sensitivity datasets and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) transcript datasets were used to assess the correlation of genes and their transcript isoforms with drug sensitivity. We identified transcripts associated with typical drugs targeting cell cycle by determining correlation coefficients. Cytotoxicity assays were used to confirm the effect of ENST00000257904 against cyclin dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors. Finally, alternative splicing transcripts associated with mitotic (M) phase arrest were analyzed using an RNA synthesis inhibition assay and transcriptome analysis. RESULTS: We established high-resolution transcriptome datasets of synchronized cell cycle samples from colon cancer HCT116 and breast cancer MDA-MB-231 cells. The results of the cell cycle assessment showed that 43,326, 41,578 and 29,244 transcripts were found to be periodically expressed in HeLa, HCT116 and MDA-MB-231 cells, respectively, among which 1280 transcripts showed this expression pattern in all three cancer cell lines. Drug sensitivity assessments showed that a large number of these transcripts displayed a higher correlation with drug sensitivity than their corresponding genes. Cell cycle-related drug screening showed that the level of the CDK4 transcript ENST00000547281 was more significantly associated with the resistance of cells to CDK4/6 inhibitors than the level of the CDK4 reference transcript ENST00000257904. The transcriptional inhibition assay following M phase arrest further confirmed the M-phase-specific expression of the splicing transcripts. Combined with the cell cycle-related drug screening, the results also showed that a set of periodic transcripts, for example, ENST00000314392 (a dolichyl-phosphate mannosyltransferase polypeptide 2 isoform transcript), was more associated with drug sensitivity than the levels of their corresponding gene transcripts. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we identified a panel of cell cycle-related periodic transcripts and found that the levels of transcripts of drug target genes showed different values for predicting drug sensitivity, providing novel insights into alternative splicing-related drug development and evaluation.

Age at initial diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer: a nationwide multicenter retrospective study in China.

Background: Several studies have indicated possible associations between age and the prognosis of breast cancer (BC), but limited data are available from hospital-based multicenter studies in China. This study aimed to explore the associations between age at initial diagnosis of BC and the risk of recurrence or metastasis among Chinese women with newly diagnosed advanced breast cancer (ABC) and provide treatment decision support for BC patients of different ages to medical workers. Methods: The medical records of patients newly diagnosed with ABC were obtained from 21 hospitals in seven geographic regions in China from 2012 to 2014. Patients' general information, clinicopathological features at first diagnosis, treatment information, and prognosis were retrospectively collected based on the self-designed case report form (CRF). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to determine hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the associations between age groups and the risk of recurrence and metastasis. Results: A total of 1,852 cases were included in the final analysis. Age at initial diagnosis was shown to be significantly related to hormone receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, molecular subtypes, and the number of lymph node metastasis (all P<0.05). Patients aged <35 years were more likely to have bone metastasis (45.6%). Patients aged ≥65 years had a lower percentage of receiving surgery (87.1%), adjuvant chemotherapy (61.3%), adjuvant radiotherapy (35.5%), and adjuvant endocrine therapy (30.6%) than the other groups (all P<0.05). Compared with patients aged <35 years, the risk of recurrence or metastasis in those aged 55-64 years was significantly higher (HRage 55-64 =1.24, 95% CI: 1.04-1.47), and the risk of bone metastasis and lung metastasis in those aged 35-44 years was lower (HRbone metastasis =0.74, 95% CI: 0.59-0.93; HRlung metastasis =0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.93). After adjusting for stage, grade, and molecular subtype, surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant endocrine therapy, and family history of BC, patients aged 35-44 years still had a significantly reduced risk of bone metastasis and lung metastasis by 31% and 52%, respectively (HRbone metastasis =0.69, 95% CI: 0.48-0.98; HRlung metastasis =0.48, 95% CI: 0.31-0.74). Conclusions: Age at initial diagnosis is related to the clinicopathological characteristics and treatment pattern. Although the risk of site-specific metastasis varies by age, age is not an independent factor influencing the risk of total recurrence and metastasis. In accordance with current clinical practice guidelines for BC, however, precise treatment shall be chosen personally for patients whose ages at initial diagnosis are different.

Combined analysis of receptor expression reflects inter-and intra-tumor heterogeneity in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HR+/HER2+ breast cancer comprise approximately 5-10% of all invasive breast cancers. However, the lack of knowledge regarding the complexity of tumor heterogeneity in HR+/HER2+ disease remains a barrier to more accurate therapies. This study aimed to describe the tumor heterogeneity of HR+/HER2+ breast cancer and to establish a novel indicator to identify the HER2-enriched subtype in patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer. METHODS: First of all, a comprehensive analysis was performed on HR+/HER2+ breast cancer samples from the TCGA (n = 141) and METABRIC (n = 104) databases. We determined the distribution of PAM50 intrinsic subtypes within the two cohorts and compared the somatic mutational profile and RNA expression features between HER2-enriched and non-HER2-enriched subtypes. From this, we constructed a novel marker termed rH/E, which was calculated as ERBB2 expression quantity/(ESR1 expression quantity + 1). Secondly, we performed multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) to evaluate HER2 and estrogen receptor (ER) expression simultaneously in the third cohort, enrolling 43 cases of early HR+/HER2+ breast cancer from Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS). When using mIF, rH/E was adjusted to prH/E, which was calculated as HER2-positive cells%/(ER-positive cells + 1)%. RESULTS: All four main intrinsic subtypes were identified in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, of which the luminal B subtype was the most common, followed by the HER2-enriched and luminal A subtypes. Significantly increased TP53 and ERBB3 and decreased PIK3CA somatic mutation frequency were observed in the HER2-enriched subtype compared with the non-HER2-enriched subtype. In addition, the HER2-enriched subtype was characterized by significantly higher ERBB2 and lower ESR1 expression. We then constructed a marker termed rH/E to reflect the relative expression of ERBB2 to ESR1 in each patient. rH/E discriminates the HER2-enriched subtype from the better than the expression of ERBB2 or ESR1 alone. In the CAMS cohort, we observed four subtypes of tumor cells: ER+/HER2-, ER+/HER2+, ER-/HER2+, and ER-/HER2-. Tumor cell diversity was common, with 86% of patients having all four subtypes of tumor cells. Moreover, prH/E showed a significant prognostic association in the CAMS cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This study furthers our understanding of the complexity of tumor heterogeneity in HR+/HER2+ breast cancer, and suggests that the combined analysis of ERBB2 and ESR1 expression may contribute to identifying patients with specific subtypes in this population.

Comparisons of Treatment for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer between Chinese and International Practice: A Nationwide Multicenter Epidemiological Study from China.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the status of medical treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer and the differences between the Chinese and the international clinical practice. METHODS: This was a retrospective, nationwide, multicenter, epidemiological study of advanced breast cancer patients from China. Between January 01, 2012, and December 31, 2014, a total of 3649 patients, covering 7 geographic regions and 21 institutions, participated in this series of studies. HER2-positive breast cancer was selected among the group and adopted into this study. In comparison, we summarized the demographics and clinical characteristics of HER2-positive breast cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. RESULTS: A total of 918 patients diagnosed as HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included. The median age at diagnosis was 46 years (ranging, 23 to 78) with a single-peak incidence. The proportions of stages II-IV at diagnosis and distance metastasis in viscera were more than half of the participants. In comparison, the prevalence of estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive expression and luminalB subtype was relatively lower than that of the United States. The receipt of chemotherapy was fairly higher, while the usage of targeted therapy was seriously insufficient. Tumor size was in significantly positive associations with the duration of targeted therapy (Kendall's correlation coefficient = 0.3, P < 0.0001), while no prohibitive variables among clinical characteristics were detected. CONCLUSION: Our study suggested that HER2-positive breast cancer patients were characterized as a younger trend, a lower prevalence of hormonal receptor (HR)-positive expression, and less accessible to anti-HER2 targeted therapy with insufficient duration over the past few years in China. Concerted efforts should be exerted for promising survival benefits in the future. The trial registration number is https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03047889.

Population pharmacokinetics of the anti-PD-1 antibody camrelizumab in patients with multiple tumor types and model-informed dosing strategy.

Camrelizumab, a programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma, nasopharyngeal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer. The aim of this study was to perform a population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of camrelizumab to quantify the impact of patient characteristics and to investigate the appropriateness of a flat dose in the dosing regimen. A total of 3092 camrelizumab concentrations from 133 patients in four clinical trials with advanced melanoma, relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma and other solid tumor types were analyzed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. The PKs of camrelizumab were properly described using a two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear clearance. Then, covariate model building was conducted using stepwise forward addition and backward elimination. The results showed that baseline albumin had significant effects on linear clearance, while actual body weight affected intercompartmental clearance. However, their impacts were limited, and no dose adjustments were required. The final model was further evaluated by goodness-of-fit plots, bootstrap procedures, and visual predictive checks and showed satisfactory model performance. Moreover, dosing regimens of 200 mg every 2 weeks and 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks provided similar exposure distributions by model-based Monte Carlo simulation. The population analyses demonstrated that patient characteristics have no clinically meaningful impact on the PKs of camrelizumab and present evidence for no advantage of either the flat dose or weight-based dose regimen for most patients with advanced solid tumors.

Profile and outcome of receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases: a nation-wide multicenter epidemiological study.

Although receptor status including estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) of the primary breast tumors was related to the prognosis of breast cancer patients, little information is yet available on whether patient management and survival are impacted by receptor conversion in breast cancer metastases. Using data from the nation-wide multicenter clinical epidemiology study of advanced breast cancer in China (NCT03047889), we report the situation of retesting ER, PR and HER2 status for breast cancer metastases and evaluate the patient management and prognostic value of receptor conversion. In total, 3295 patients were analyzed and 1583 (48.0%) patients retesting receptor status for metastasis. Discordance in one or more receptors between the primary and the metastatic biopsy was found in 37.7% of women. Patients who remained hormone receptor (HR) positive in their metastases had similar progression-free survival of first-line and second-line treatment compared to patients with HR conversion (P > .05). In multivariate analysis, patients who showed ER conversion from negative to positive had longer disease-free survival (DFS) than patients who remained negative in their metastases (hazard ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.45-2.90; P < .001). Patients with PR remained positive and had longer DFS than patients with PR conversion from negative to positive (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83; P = .004). Patients with PR conversion have shorter overall survival than patients with PR remained positive or negative (P = .016 and P = .041, respectively). Our findings showed that the receptors' conversions were common in metastatic breast cancer, and the conversion impacted the survival.

Changes in clinical trials of cancer drugs in mainland China over the decade 2009-18: a systematic review.

As a result of recent, substantial capacity building, a new landscape for cancer drug trials is emerging in China. However, data on the characteristics of cancer drug trials, and how they have changed over time, are scarce. Based on clinical trials published on the China Food and Drug Administration Registration and Information Disclosure Platform for Drug Clinical Studies, we aimed to systematically review changes over time in clinical trials of cancer drugs in mainland China from 2009 to 2018, to provide insight on the effectiveness of the pharmaceutical industry and identify unmet clinical needs of stakeholders. A total of 1493 trials of 751 newly tested cancer drugs were initiated. Increases over time were observed for the annual number of initiated trials, newly tested drugs, and newly added leading clinical trial units, with a sharp increase after 2016. Of the 1385 trials in which cancer types were identified, solid tumours (325 [23%] trials), non-small-cell lung cancer (232 [17%]), and lymphoma (126 [9%]) were the most common. A markedly uneven distribution was also observed in the geography of leading units with the largest number of leading units located in east China (50 [41%]) and the smallest number located in southwest China (4 [3%]). The growth trends we observed illustrate the progress in and increasing capability of cancer drug research and development achieved in mainland China over the decade from 2009. The low number of clinical trials on tumours with epidemiological characteristics unique to the Chinese population and the unbalanced geographical distribution of leading clinical trial units will provide potential targets for policy makers and other stakeholders. Further research efforts should address cancers uniquely relevant to Chinese populations, globally rare cancers, and the balance between equitable drug access, efficiency, and sustainability of cancer drug research and development in mainland China.

Switching to anastrozole plus goserelin vs continued tamoxifen for adjuvant therapy of premenopausal early-stage breast cancer: preliminary results from a randomized trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life impact of switching adjuvant treatment in hormone receptor-positive primary breast cancer patients who are still premenopausal after 2-3 years of tamoxifen therapy to anastrozole plus goserelin as compared with continuing tamoxifen over a total period of 5 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hormone receptor-positive, premenopausal, lymph node-positive, or tumor size ≥4 cm breast cancer patients who had received tamoxifen for 2-3 years were randomly assigned to continue tamoxifen treatment (TAM group) or switch to adjuvant anastrozole plus goserelin (ADD group) and continue treatment for another 2-3 years (total treatment duration 5 years). Endpoints evaluated were adverse events (AEs), changes in bone mineral density, quality of life, and disease-free survival-related events. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients (33 in the ADD group and 29 in the TAM group) were evaluated. Grade 3-4 drug-related AEs occurred in five patients (15.2%) in the ADD group vs none in the TAM group. In the ADD group, arthralgias were the most common AEs (5/33 patients; 15.2%), and three patients in this group were discontinued because of AEs. Treatment was temporarily suspended due to AEs in three patients (9.1%) in the ADD group and one patient (3.4%) in the TAM group. Compared with continuing TAM therapy, switching to anastrozole plus goserelin did not result in any worsening of bone mineral density or quality of life. During a median follow-up of 34 months, five patients (15.2%) in the ADD group had disease-free survival events vs four patients (13.8%) in the TAM group. CONCLUSION: For early-stage breast cancer patients who remain premenopausal following 2-3 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy, switching to anastrozole plus goserelin therapy was safe with tolerable adverse effects. However, it did not show superior efficacy compared to remaining on tamoxifen treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier NCT01352091).

Association of HER2 status with prognosis in gastric cancer patients undergoing R0 resection: A large-scale multicenter study in China.

AIM: To determine whether the positive status of human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2) can be regarded as an effective prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer (GC) undergoing R0 resection. METHODS: A total of 1562 GC patients treated by R0 resection were recruited. HER2 status was evaluated in surgically resected samples of all the patients using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Correlations between HER2 status and clinicopathological characteristics were retrospective analyzed. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard model, stratified by age, gender, tumor location and tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage, with additional adjustment for potential prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 1562 patients, 548 (positive rate = 35.08%, 95%CI: 32.72%-37.45%) were HER2 positive. Positive status of HER2 was significantly correlated with gender (P = 0.004), minority (P < 0.001), tumor location (P = 0.001), pathological grade (P < 0.001), TNM stage (P < 0.001) and adjuvant radiotherapy (74.67% vs 23.53%, P = 0.011). No significant associations were observed between HER2 status and disease free survival (HR = 0.19, 95%CI: 0.96-1.46, P = 0.105) or overall survival (HR = 1.19, 95%CI: 0.96-1.48, P = 0.118) using multivariate analysis, although stratified analyses showed marginally statistically significant associations both in disease free survival and overall survival, especially among patients aged < 60 years or with early TNM stages (I and II). Categorical age, TNM stage, neural invasion, and adjuvant chemotherapy were, as expected, independent prognostic factors for both disease free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: The positive status of HER2 based on IHC staining was not related to the survival in patients with GC among the Chinese population.

Hormonal therapy might be a better choice as maintenance treatment than capecitabine after response to first-line capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy for patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Both hormonal therapy (HT) and maintenance capecitabine monotherapy (MCT) have been shown to extend time to progression (TTP) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after failure of taxanes and anthracycline-containing regimens. However, no clinical trials have directly compared the efficacy of MCT and HT after response to first-line capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy (FCCT) in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the charts of 138 HR-positive and HER2-negative MBC patients who were in non-progression status after FCCT and who were treated between 2003 and 2012 at the Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, in Beijing, China. The median number of first-line chemotherapy cycles was 6 (range, 4-8); combined agents included taxanes, vinorelbine, or gemcitabine. Of these 138 patients, 79 received MCT, and 59 received HT. Single-agent capecitabine was administered at a dose of 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days, followed by a 7-day rest period, repeated every 3 weeks. Of the 59 patients who received HT, 37 received aromatase inhibitors (AIs), 8 received selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), and 14 received goserelin plus either AIs or SERMs. We then compared the MCT group and HT group in terms of treatment efficacy. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 43 months, patients in the HT group had a much longer TTP than patients in the MCT group (13 vs. 8 months, P = 0.011). When TTP was adjusted for age, menopausal status, Karnofsky performance status score, disease-free survival, site of metastasis, number of metastatic sites, and response status after FCCT, extended TTP was still observed for patients in the HT group (hazard ratio: 0.63; 95% confidence interval: 0.44-0.93; P = 0.020). We also observed a trend of overall survival advantage for patients in the HT group vs. patients in the MCT group, but the difference was not significant (43 vs. 37 months, P = 0.400). In addition, patients in the HT group generally tolerated the treatment well, whereas patients in the MCT group experienced grades 3-4 adverse events, the most frequent of which were hand-foot syndrome (15.8%) and hematologic abnormalities (7.6%). CONCLUSION: For HR-positive and HER2-negative MBC patients, HT might be considered a treatment after response to FCCT but prior to MCT as a long-term administration.

Phase II multi-center clinical study on using S-1 to treat advanced breast cancer after resistance to anthracycline and taxane drugs in Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND: Treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in patients who have relapsed from anthracycline and taxane is difficult. S-1, an oral 5-FU derivative, has demonstrated a potential antitumor effect in patients with MBC. Thus, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of S-1 as second-line chemotherapy MBC patients in a phase II trial. METHODS: The study was conducted at seven centers in China and enrolled MBC patients who had previously relapsed from one chemotherapy regimen. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end point. The treatment schedule involved the administration of S-1 at a standard dose based on the body surface area (BSA) in 28-day cycles with consecutive administration followed by a 14-day rest, as follows: 40 mg twice daily if BSA < 1.25 m(2); 50 mg twice daily if 1.25 m(2) ≤ BSA ≥ 1.5 m(2); and 60 mg twice daily if BSA > 1.5 m(2). RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were included in the analysis. S-1 demonstrated moderate efficacy with a PFS of 3.3 months, a response rate of 33.3%, and a disease control rate of 72.7%. The treatment was well-tolerated with mild-to-moderate toxicity. Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 4 patients (2 with hyperbilirubinemia, 1 with anorexia, and 1 with vomiting). Grade 4 AEs were not observed. CONCLUSION: S-1 demonstrated encouraging efficacy and safety in a prospective trial as second-line treatment in MBC patients. All AEs were manageable; however, bilirubin monitoring is recommended during treatment.

Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (CBCSG006): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Platinum chemotherapy has a role in the treatment of metastatic triple-negative breast cancer but its full potential has probably not yet been reached. We assessed whether a cisplatin plus gemcitabine regimen was non-inferior to or superior to paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: For this open-label, randomised, phase 3, hybrid-designed trial undertaken at 12 institutions or hospitals in China, we included Chinese patients aged 18-70 years with previously untreated, histologically confirmed metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, and an ECOG performance status of 0-1. These patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either cisplatin plus gemcitabine (cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) or paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8) given intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. Randomisation was done centrally via an interactive web response system using block randomisation with a size of eight, with no stratification factors. Patients and investigator were aware of group assignments. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival and analyses were based on all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. The margin used to establish non-inferiority was 1·2. If non-inferiority of cisplatin plus gemcitabine compared with paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was achieved, we would then test for superiority. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01287624. FINDINGS: From Jan 14, 2011, to Nov 14, 2013, 240 patients were assessed for eligibility and randomly assigned to treatment (120 in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group and 120 in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group). 236 patients received at least one dose of assigned chemotherapy and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (118 per group). After a median follow-up of 16·3 months (IQR 14·4-26·8) in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group and 15·9 months (10·7-25·4) in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group, the hazard ratio for progression-free survival was 0·692 (95% CI 0·523-0·915; pnon-inferiority<0·0001, psuperiority=0·009, thus cisplatin plus gemcitabine was both non-inferior to and superior to paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. Median progression-free survival was 7·73 months (95% CI 6·16-9·30) in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group and 6·47 months (5·76-7·18) in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events that differed significantly between the two groups included nausea (eight [7%] vs one [<1%]), vomiting (13 [11%] vs one [<1%]), musculoskeletal pain (none vs ten [8%]), anaemia (39 [33%] vs six [5%]), and thrombocytopenia (38 [32%] vs three [3%]), for the cisplatin plus gemcitabine compared with the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine groups, respectively. In addition, patients in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group had significantly fewer events of grade 1-4 alopecia (12 [10%] vs 42 [36%]) and peripheral neuropathy (27 [23%] vs 60 [51%]), but more grade 1-4 anorexia (33 [28%] vs 10 [8%]), constipation (29 [25%] vs 11 [9%]), hypomagnesaemia (27 [23%] vs five [4%]), and hypokalaemia (10 [8%] vs two [2%]). Serious drug-related adverse events were seen in three patients in the paclitaxel plus gemcitabine group (interstitial pneumonia, anaphylaxis, and severe neutropenia) and four in the cisplatin plus gemcitabine group (pathological bone fracture, thrombocytopenia with subcutaneous haemorrhage, severe anaemia, and cardiogenic syncope). There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Cisplatin plus gemcitabine could be an alternative or even the preferred first-line chemotherapy strategy for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. FUNDING: Shanghai Natural Science Foundation.

Effect of hormone therapy on long-term outcomes of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2- and hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: real world experience in China.

BACKGROUND: Among human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, more than half are also hormone receptor (HR)-positive. Although HR is a predictive factor for the efficacy of hormone therapy, there are still some uncertainties in regard to the effects on patients with HR-positive and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancers due to the potential resistance to hormone therapy caused by co-expression of HR and HER2. There are no clinical trials directly comparing the efficacy of hormonal therapy with chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To examine the real-world effect of hormone therapy on patients with HR-positive and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancers, a cross-sectional study of a representative sample of the Chinese population was conducted. The study included 113 patients who received first-line and second-line palliative treatment between 2005 and 2010 in the Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science. The effect of hormone therapy on overall survival (OS) was studied. RESULTS: The patients who received hormone therapy (n=51) had better overall survival in contrast to those who received chemotherapy with anti-HER2 therapy (n=62) in first- or second-line treatment. The difference was of borderline statistical significance (51.8m vs 31.9m, p=0.065). In addition, the effect of hormone therapy did not differ significantly with other prognostic factors, including age (≤50 years or >50 years), disease free survival (≥2 years or < 2 years) and site of metastasis (visceral or bone/soft tissue). On multivariate analysis, administration of hormone therapy was associated with a trend toward a favorable prognosis (p=0.148, HR=0.693, 95%CI 0.422-1.139). Age more than 50 years was the sole independent harmful prognostic factor (p<0.001, HR=2.797, 95%CI 1.676-4.668). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that hormonel therapy may improve outcomes of the patients with ER-positive and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

[Clinical value of trastuzumab in the treatment of lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer].

OBJECTIVE: Retrospective and prospective studies have shown that continuous administration of trastuzumab with different chemotherapy regimens resulted in better clinical outcomes than the administration of chemotherapy alone in women with HER2-positive, trastuzumab-refractory metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there are limited data to evaluate the activity of trastuzumab in patients progressed after other anti-HER2 therapies, e.g. lapatinib. The aim of the present study was to evaluate retrospectively the clinical value of trastuzumab in patients with lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive advanced breast cancer treated in our center. METHODS: Patients with HER2-positive MBC who experienced progression after first-line lapatinib-based regimens were assigned to receive either conventional treatment without trastuzumab or in combination with trastuzumab as second-line therapy. The efficacy end points included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirty-five eligible patients progressed after treatment with lapatinib-based regimens were collected. None of the patients had received prior trastuzumab in either the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Twenty-two patients were assigned to receive conventional treatment without trastuzumab as second-line therapy (non-T arm) and 13 patients received conventional treatment combined with trastuzumab (T arm). There were no significant differences in the main clinical factors between the two arms, such as age, PS status, ER/PR, metastatic status, etc. Both the two cases with no disease progression after the second-line therapy were trastuzumab-treated patients, and all the other 33 cases were patients with progression despite the second-line therapy. Twenty-seven patients died due to disease progression, and eight survived (six cases of the T-arm and two cases of the non-T arm). The median PFS was 3.3 months in the non-T arm and 10.0 months in the T arm (P = 0.001). The median OS was 7.0 months in the non-T arm and 31.1 months in the T arm (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Trastuzumab plus conventional treatment is superior to conventional treatment in women with lapatinib-resistant HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Continuous anti-HER2 management can provide survival benefit to patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.